RESUMEN
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To reduce surgical exposure and improve accuracy, this study evaluated the anatomical distance parameter D (including D1, D2, and D3) of the lumbar isthmus for cortical bone screw insertion. METHODS: A total of 25 structurally complete lumbar dry specimens were used for lumbar anatomy measurements. The six cadaver specimens were divided into upper and lower parts on the plane of the T11-T12 vertebrae, and we use the lower parts. Therefore, six lumbar wet specimens and another four complete lumbar dry specimens were selected. The lumbar isthmus tangent point was considered a coordinate origin, and the insertion point was determined through translating the distance of D1 value to the midline of the vertebral body horizontally and then vertically moved toward inferior board of the transverse process with the distance of D3 value. RESULTS: In four dry and six wet intact lumbar specimens, cortical bone screws were placed according to the average value of the isthmus parameter D. A total of 100 trajectories were verified in specimens by X-ray and computed topography scan to evaluate the safety, accuracy, and feasibility of the surgical use of isthmus parameter D. Using this parameter, the rates of excellent screw placement were 95% (38/40) in four dry specimens and 88.7% (53/60) in six wet specimens. CONCLUSION: The isthmus parameter D is easier to use by the operator, which can improve surgical accuracy and reduce operation time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective study.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare biomechanical properties of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and traditional trajectory screw for fixing upper-middle thoracic spine. Methods The tomography images were obtained by CT scanning of normal T7 and T8 segments, and the three-dimensional (3D) model of T7-8 was reconstructed by Mimics software. The finite element model of upper-middle thoracic spine was established by optimizing FreeForm model and pre-processing function of ANSYS software. On this basis, the CBT screw and pedicle screw fixation models after discectomy were established, and 5 N·m flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation loads were applied to the two model groups, respectively. The displacement and peak stress of vertebrae and implants under different working conditions were compared and analyzed. Results Under different loading conditions, the maximum displacement of CBT screw group was lower than that of pedicle screw group, and the range of motion of CBT screw group was lower than that of pedicle screw group. The stress level of both models was close, and the stress of CBT screw group was slightly lower than that of pedicle screw group. Under the load of flexion, extension and rotation, the maximum vertebral stress of pedicle screw group decreased by 31%, 17% and 18% compared with that of CBT screw group, and under lateral bending load, the vertebral stress of CBT screw group was 20% lower than that of pedicle screw group. Under the load of flexion and rotation, the maximum stress of pedicle screw group decreased by 2% and 11%; however, the maximum stress of CBT screw group was 11% and 1% lower than that of pedicle screw group. Conclusions The stability of CBT screw was better than that of pedicle screw, and the overall stress distribution was similar to that of pedicle screw. However, the vertebral stress distribution of CBT group was slightly inferior. The research findings provide a theoretical basis for the clinical application of cortical screw fixation after the failure in pedicle screw fixation for the upper-middle thoracic vertebrae.