RESUMEN
Background There is wide variation in the incidence of colorectal cancer globally and also within the same country among different racial or ethnic groups. The present population-based study was undertaken to determine the incidence of colorectal cancer in Kashmiri population which is non-migratory and ethnically homogeneous having stable food habits. Methods Over a period of one year, all newly diagnosed and histological proved cases of colorectal cancer in all possible areas, where such patients are diagnosed and treated were prospectively registered. Results A total of 212 cases of colorectal cancers were registered; of them 113 (53.3%) originated in the colon and other 99 (46.7%) in rectum. Male to female ratio was 1.2:1. The crude incidence rate of colorectal cancer was 3.65/ 100,000; it was 3.78 in males, and 3.50/100,000 in females. The incidence rates for colorectal cancer in Muslims and Hindus were different. The crude incidence rate for colorectal carcinoma was highest for district Srinagar 6.19/100,000 (urban area) and lowest for district Kupwara (rural area) 1.59/100,000. The highest numbers of cases were detected in the age group 55–59 years (n=34). The agespecific rate for colorectal carcinoma was highest in the age group 55–59 years (17.21/100,000), followed by 65–69 years (14.86/100,000). The age standardized incidence rate was 4.52/100,000 per year. The truncated age adjusted incidence rates in age group 35–64 years was 8.31/100,000; while that for colorectal carcinoma was 8.77/100,000 in males and 7.66/100,000 in females. Conclusion We conclude that the incidence of colorectal cancer in Kashmir valley is similar to that reported in the rest of India.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence pattern of malignancy after kidney transplantation is different from that of the general population. Because increased exposure to immunosuppressants results in an increased incidence of malignancy, institutional reports that do not consider duration of immunosuppression have limited value for providing future kidney recipients with the actual risk for malignancy or for developing a kidney allograft recipient surveillance program. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed our institutional data with regard to the duration of exposure to immunosuppressants. METHODS: A total of 757 patients who had kidney transplantation and were followed-up for at least 6 months at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The crude incidence rate (CI) was calculated by counting the days of exposure to immunosuppressants. RESULTS: Most malignancies after kidney transplantation were solid tumors (85.3%). The CI of malignancies was 641.1 in allograft recipients and 329.6 in the general population per 100,000 persons per year. Solid tumor cancers of the stomach, liver, lung, breast, cervix, and pancreas showed an increased CI in the allograft recipient group than the general population but cancers of the thyroid and colon did not. Based on the type of immunosuppressive agent, the CI was highest in the cyclosporine group (866/12 months/100,000 persons) than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided the CIs of cancers after kidney transplantation at our institute. The pattern of post-transplant malignancy is different from that of western countries. Nationwide registration is needed to provide a more rational approach to post-transplant cancer surveillance in Korea.