Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 669-672, 2018.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-777707

RESUMEN

@#With the increasing development of digital technologies, digital surgical templates have been widely used in stomatology. However, the accuracy of digital surgical templates is always a consideration for many researchers and dentists. This article analyzed the factors affecting the accuracy of digital surgical templates and found that errors arise from six factors, including the design and manufacture of the templates, implant guide support, implant systems and guide systems, implant length, bone density and the clinical experience of the operator; this literature review aims to reduce or eliminate human factors and improve accuracy, objectivity and security in implant placement.

2.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 435-438, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-822272

RESUMEN

Objective@#To evaluate the accuracy of digital surgical guide in tilted implant in the maxillary posterior region.@*Methods @# Jaw data from 14 patients were scanned using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and digital models were acquired by scanning maxillary plaster models. Implant software was employed to process jaw data and digital models in order to design the surgical template. Then the stereolithographic (SLA) surgical template was created to guide the surgery. After that CBCT data was collected again and compared with the data collected before. Deviations between the actual implant position and the planned implant position were analyzed. @*Results@#Central deviation at the hex and apex between the actual implant and the planned implant was almost constant with a mean of (0.625 ± 0.183) mm and (0.820 ± 0.208) mm. Mean value of horizontal deviation at the hex was (0.314 ± 0.070) mm, horizontal deviation at the apex was (0.509 ± 0.139) mm, vertical deviation at the hex was (0.538 ± 0.178) mm, vertical deviation at the apex was (0.638 ± 0.178) mm. @*Conclusion@#Angled implantation in the maxillary posterior region can reduce risks and trauma as well as the difficulties and duration of surgery. However, our data suggested that significant deviations existed in the actual implant position and the planned implant position.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA