Long-term Outcome of Incision and Curettage Treatment in Patients with Lacrimal Gland Ductulitis

PURPOSE: To describe the effects and long-term outcomes of incision and curettage treatment in patients with lacrimal gland ductulitis.METHODS: Twenty-four patients (24 eyes) with lacrimal gland ductulitis who were treated at Saevit Eye Hospital from June 2010 to November 2016. All patients underwent incision and curettage through the lacrimal ductule, and granules or concretions were removed. After the procedure, oral and topical antibiotics, oral anti-inflammatory agent were used for a week. Clinical presentations of the patients were analyzed. The resolution of symptoms and inflammatory signs and recurrence were evaluated more than 12 months after the procedure including telephone follow-up by a specialist nurse.RESULTS: Common symptoms were a painful, swelling mass with mucous discharge (17 eyes) and conjunctival injection (7 eyes) at the lateral canthal area. During the procedure, 22 patients (91.7%) had typical sulfur granule of Actinomyces, and 10 patients (41.7%) had many cilia in the expressed debris from the ductule. Twenty-three of 24 patients had resolution of symptoms after the procedure and all but one patient (95.8%) showed no recurrence.CONCLUSIONS: Incision and curettage is a simple and less invasive procedure that may be considered as a first treatment option for lacrimal gland ductulitis. Furthermore, incision and curettage of the affected lacrimal ductule has been shown to be effective at minimizing long-term recurrence of lacrimal ductulitis.

Biopsia hepática en la patología del trasplante, período postrasplante temprano, enfoque dirigido al diagnóstico histopatológico y su correlación clínico-patológica: Histopathological Diagnosis and Clinicopathological Correlation in the Early Post-Transplant Period / Liver Biopsies in Transplant Pathology

La biopsia hepática de los aloinjertos sigue siendo considerada el estándar de oro y juega un papel importante e integral en la interpretación y explicación de los cambios que puedan ocurrir en respuesta a alteraciones en las pruebas de la función o bioquímica hepática, anomalías funcionales o alteración en las imágenes diagnósticas, las cuales pueden, o no, ir acompañadas de síntomas. También es útil en el seguimiento o biopsias por protocolo (1-3). La evaluación de biopsias, después del trasplante, puede ser difícil debido a que es muy amplio el espectro de las complicaciones que pueden presentarse en el período postrasplante; más aún, cuando muchas de ellas necesitan un diagnóstico y tratamiento inmediato. La patología más frecuente es el rechazo agudo. Sin embargo, también pueden observarse cambios de perfusión/reperfusión, alteraciones funcionales, recidiva de enfermedad de base, lesión de la vía biliar, lesiones vasculares, infecciones oportunistas, patologías de novo, como la hepatitis autoinmune, hepatitis crónica idiopática postrasplante, toxicidad farmacológica o tumores, entre otras patologías (4). En este artículo relacionado con la patología del trasplante hepático se tratarán las patologías más frecuentes, no quirúrgicas, en el período postrasplante temprano, con un enfoque histopatológico dirigido a las dificultades y controversias para una adecuada correlación clínico-patológica.

Biopsies of liver allografts are still considered to be the gold standard. They play an important and integral role in the interpretation and explanation of changes that may occur in response to alterations in function tests, in the interpretation and explanation of liver biochemistry, in the interpretation and explanation of functional abnormalities, and in the interpretation and explanation of diagnostic images (whether or not accompanied by symptoms). Biopsies are also useful for monitoring and are often part of the protocol (1-3). The evaluation of biopsy samples after transplantation can be difficult especially because of the very broad spectrum of complications that may arise in the post-transplant period. Many of them require immediate diagnosis and treatment despite this difficulty. Although the most common condition is acute rejection, many other conditions and disorders can be observed. They include perfusion/reperfusion alterations, functional impairment, recurrence of underlying diseases, injury to the bile duct, vascular lesions, opportunistic infections, de novo pathologies such as autoimmune hepatitis, post-transplant idiopathic chronic hepatitis, drug toxicity, and tumors (4). This is the second article about the pathology of liver transplantation. It discusses the most common pathologies in the early post-transplant period and provides a histopathological approach towards difficulties and controversies for adequate clinicopathological correlation.

Clinical Evaluation of Lacrimal Gland Ductal Disease

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and management of lacrimal gland ductal disease, a rare disease often mistaken for other diseases. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 11 patients (11 eyes, 5 males, 6 females) diagnosed with lacrimal ductal disease between March 2007 and April 2013 was performed. RESULTS: Among 11 eyes in 11 patients, 4 were diagnosed with dacryops and 7 with lacrimal gland ductulitis initiated by dacryolith. The mean age of the subjects was 47.9 years (range, 30-80 years). Lacrimal gland ductulitis patients received treatment for conjunctivitis or hordeolum for several months. Four cases involved the right eye and 7 cases involved the left eye. Symptoms included foreign body sensation, pus-like discharge and palpable mass. Biopsy was performed in 3 cases and showed no specific findings. Patients with dacryops underwent marsupialization, whereas patients diagnosed with lacrimal gland ductulitis underwent excision and dacryolith curettage. During the 2-month follow-up period, all cases showed no signs of recurrence or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Lacrimal gland ductal disease can be mistaken for other diseases such as conjunctivitis, hordeolum, or orbital cyst, thus requiring accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

Lacrimal Gland Ductulitis: Clinical Features and Management

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics and management of a group of patients who had infection of the lacrimal gland ductules. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 12 patients who had infection of the lacrimal gland ductules and were managed at Saevit Eye Hospital from June 2010 to May 2012. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 31.8 +/- 17.7 years, and 7 were male and 5 were female. Common symptoms were a painful, swelling mass with mucous discharge (8 eyes) and conjunctival injection (4 eyes) at the lateral canthal area. All patients underwent surgical intervention by incision and curettage. Eleven patients (91.7%) had typical sulfur granule of actinomyces, and 8 patients (66.7%) had many cilia in the expressed debris from the ductule. All patients had resolution of symptoms after the procedure and showed no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Infective lacrimal gland ductulitis should be considered when a painful swelling mass with mucous discharge at the lateral canthal area is present. Surgical intervention by incision and curettage can be attempted preferentially as a minimally-invasive treatment option.