Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery ; (6): 56-60, 2020.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-798824

RESUMEN

Objective@#To explore the treatment effects of domestic auricular orthosis on children born with congenital auricular deformity.@*Methods@#Children born with congenital auricle deformity were treated by "Yi Er" auricle orthosis, included 42 ears of 29 cases.These children were divided into three groups according to the birth age. The age less than 7 days was divided into group 1, 7-42 days for group 2, and more than 42 days for group 3. Compare the therapeutic effect of children in different ages.@*Results@#The therapeutic effect was divided into three grades: markedly effective and cured (basically return to normal appearance); effective (improved, but not reached the normal appearance); invalid (no improvement after treatment). The markedly effective and cured rate in group 1, group 2 and group 3 were 100%, 85.7% and 45.0%, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the average correction time was(20.75±6.50)d, (32.64±15.40)d, (48.23±17.32) d, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#The domestic auricle orthosis has a significant effect on the correction of children born with congenital auricular deformity. The better treatment effect and the shorter wearing time can be acquired in the early correction.

2.
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery ; : 878-881, 2015.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-646846

RESUMEN

Making impression is the first step of making hearing aid. Because it needs silicon injection on external auditory canal and lateral side of tympanic membrane, careful evaluation is required regarding the presence of any tympanic perforation or problems of external auditory canal prior to making ear impression. Recently, we experienced encountering one case of foreign body in ear while making impression of hearing aid by a local hearing aid seller. Silicone mold material, impacted into the middle ear, had perforated the tympanic membrane; a metallic foreign body was also found in the eustachian tube. Reporting this case, we suggest that special attention be paid to tympanic membrane and external auditory canal conditions when making an ear impression for hearing aids. Therefore, physical examination by otolaryngologist should precede any application of hearing aid.


Asunto(s)
Oído , Conducto Auditivo Externo , Oído Medio , Trompa Auditiva , Cuerpos Extraños , Hongos , Audífonos , Audición , Examen Físico , Silicio , Siliconas , Membrana Timpánica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA