RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the clinical effects of the dissection of the implant pockets with ultrasonic scalpel or traditional electroscalpel through the axillary approach under endoscopic assistant.Methods:A total of 125 female patients with an average of 32.5 years, ranged from 21 to 44 years, underwent endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation in the Department of Plastic Surgery, the Affiliated Friendship Plastic Surgery Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, from January 2019 to December 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. The implant pockets were dissected with ultrasonic scalpel (ultrasonic scalpel group) in 64 patients or with traditional electroscalpel (electroscalpel group) in 61 patients. The operation time, operation speed, postoperative drainage, drainage tube removal time and hospital stay of the two groups were compared and analyzed statistically.Results:Compared with the electroscalpel group, the average operation time of the ultrasonic scalpel group 75(71-90) min was significantly shorter than that of the electroscalpel group 105(80-135) min ( t=4.10, P<0.001), the operation speed (3.27±0.44 ml/min) was faster than that of the electroscalpel group (2.52±0.72 ml/min) ( t=4.71, P<0.001), the postoperative drainage 130.5(98.8-193.3) ml was significantly less than that of the electroscalpel group 281.75(145.5-328.3) ml ( t=2.21, P<0.05), and the drainage tube removal time 3 (3-4) d and hospital stay 3 (3-4) d were remarkablely shorter than that of the electroscalpel group 4 (3-4) d, 5 (4-6) d ( t=3.58; t=4.06, P<0.05). Conclusions:The application of ultrasonic scalpel in endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation is safe and reliable. In addtion to improving the surgical efficiency, ultrasonic scalpel can reduce blood loss, shorten the time of hospital stay and reduce complications, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical application.
RESUMEN
La aplicación del LÁSER (light amplification of stimulation emision of radiation) en las áreas de la medicina y la odontología viene demostrando una constante evolución, brindándonos alternativas a los tratamientos convencionales. Los láseres quirúrgicos de tejidos blandos muestran grandes ventajas comparados a los procedimientos habituales de corte, ya sea con bisturí frío o electrobisturí. La mínima necesidad de anestesia, la analgesia intra y postoperatoria, la coagulación inmediata, la cicatrización por segunda, el efecto bactericida, la ausencia de puntos de sutura, el confort postoperatorio, son algunas de las ventajas que hacen que la cirugía con láser sea una opción indiscutible que está ganando terreno entre los profesionales de la salud (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Electrocirugia/métodos , Aparatos de Tracción Extraoral , Rayos Láser , Frenillo Lingual/cirugía , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Argentina , Facultades de Odontología , Logopedia , Cicatrización de Heridas , Técnica de Expansión Palatina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aparatos Ortodóncicos FuncionalesRESUMEN
A escala mundial, la electrocirugía no es ampliamente utilizada en el ámbito odontológico, lo cual se puede deber al uso del láser y al desconocimiento asociado a la técnica; cabe destacar que este tipo de procedimientos no se suele enseñar en la mayoría de las facultades de Odontología. Además, aunado a lo anterior, tanto los oponentes como los defensores de la electrocirugía han presentado estudios clínicos e informes contradictorios, que pueden disuadir al odontólogo a emplear dicha técnica. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este artículo es ahondar en el conocimiento actual de la electrocirugía en la Odontología; asimismo, se pretende ilustrar la información con un caso clínico. De esta forma, se concluye que la electrocirugía es una herramienta auxiliar en Odontología; donde sus aplicaciones dependerán directamente de la habilidad, la destreza y los conocimientos del operador, tanto de los principios de la técnica como de la estructura y el funcionamiento de los tejidos donde se aplica, pero los criterios adecuados son importantes para saber cuándo se puede recurrir o no a esta medida terapéutica, considerándola como un complemento y no como un método que se pueda aplicar para resolver todos los casos clínicos.
At the global level, electrosurgery is not widely used in the dental field, which may be due to the use of the laser and the lack of knowledge associated with the technique; it hould be noted that such procedures are not usually taught in most dental schools. In addition, to the above, both opponents and defenders of electrosurgery have presented clinical studies and conflicting reports that may dissuade the dentist from using this technique. Therefore, the aim of this article is to delve into the current knowledge of electrosurgery in dentistry; likewise, it is intended to illustrate the information with a clinical case. In this way, it is concluded that electrosurgery is an auxiliary tool in dentistry; where their applications will depend directly on the skills, and knowledge of the operator, both the principles of the technique and the structure and functioning of the tissues where it is applied, being important, the appropriate criteria to know when can resort to this therapeutic measure or not, considering it as a complement and not as a method that can be applied to resolve all clinical cases.
RESUMEN
LEEP electro-scalpel is a type of cervical disease device. It belongs to the high frequency electro-knife in medical apparatus category. There is no domestic LEEP electro-scalpel at present. It is significant and important for the study group to resolve the safety and EMC problem and develop domestic LEEP electro-scalpel which is safe, stable and competitive in price while has the same surgery effect as the imported one.