Experiência inicial com ultrassom Doppler com contraste por microbolhas em adição ao ultrassom Doppler convencional para seguimento de correção endovascular de aneurisma de aorta abdominal / Initial experience with Duplex scan combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for follow-up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Resumo Contexto O ultrassom contrastado por microbolhas (CMUS) é uma modalidade diagnóstica de acurácia bem demonstrada por estudos internacionais para seguimento de reparo endovascular do aneurisma de aorta abdominal (EVAR). Não existem, no entanto, estudos nacionais focados nesse método de seguimento. Objetivos O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar a experiência inicial com CMUS em um hospital terciário, traçando uma comparação dos achados do CMUS com o ultrassom Doppler convencional (USGD), com o intuito de verificar se a adição de contraste ao protocolo padrão de controle ultrassonográfico incorreu alteração nos achados. Métodos Entre 2015 e 2017, 21 pacientes em seguimento de EVAR foram submetidos ao USGD seguido de CMUS. Foram avaliados os achados de exame referentes à identificação de complicações, bem como à capacidade de identificação da origem da endofuga. Resultados Entre os 21 casos avaliados, 10 complicações foram evidenciadas no total: sete pacientes apresentaram endofuga (33,3%); dois pacientes apresentaram estenose em ramo de endoprótese (9,52%); e um paciente apresentou dissecção em artéria ilíaca externa (4,76%). Em 21 pacientes avaliados, o uso combinado dos métodos identificou 10 casos de complicações pós-EVAR. Em seis dos sete casos de endofugas (85,71%), o uso dos métodos combinados foi capaz de identificar a origem. O USGD isolado falhou na identificação da endofuga em dois casos (28,5%), identificando achados duvidosos em outros dois casos (28,5%), que obtiveram definição diagnóstica após associação do CMUS. Conclusões O CMUS é uma técnica de fácil execução, a qual adiciona subsídios ao seguimento de EVAR infrarrenal.

Abstract Background Microbubble contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an accurate diagnostic method for follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) that has been well-established in international studies. However, there are no Brazilian studies that focus on this follow-up method. Objectives The objective of this study was to report initial experience with CEUS at a tertiary hospital, comparing the findings of CEUS with those of conventional Doppler ultrasound (DUS), with the aim of determining whether addition of contrast to the standard ultrasonographic control protocol resulted in different findings. Methods From 2015 to 2017, 21 patients in follow-up after EVAR underwent DUS followed by CEUS. The findings of these examinations were analyzed in terms of identification of complications and their capacity to identify the origin of endoleaks. Results There was evidence of complications in 10 of the 21 cases examined: seven patients exhibited endoleaks (33.3%); two patients exhibited stenosis of a branch of the endograft (9.52%); and one patient exhibited a dissection involving the external iliac artery (4.76%). In the 21 patients assessed, combined use of both methods identified 10 cases of post-EVAR complications. In six of the seven cases of endoleaks (85.71%), use of the methods in combination was capable of identifying the origin of endoleakage. DUS alone failed to identify endoleaks in two cases (28.5%) and identified doubtful findings in another two cases (28.5%), in which diagnostic definition was achieved after employing CEUS. Conclusions CEUS is a technique that is easy to perform and provides additional support for follow-up of infrarenal EVAR.

Endofuga tipo IB, complicación tardía de prótesis endovascular / Type IB endoleak: a late complication of endovascular prosthetic repair

Objetivo: describir las endofugas como complicación tardía de las prótesis por reparación endovascular de aneurisma de aorta abdominal, a través del reporte de caso presentado en el Hospital Universitario del Quindío San Juan de Dios Colombia. Diseño del estudio: reporte de caso. Presentación: hombre de 77 años, con antecedente de implante de endoprótesis en la aorta abdominal infrarrenal y en las arterias iliacas derecha e izquierda. Siete años después ingresó al servicio de urgencias por hipotensión, diaforesis y dolor abdominal de inicio súbito. Se realizó intervención quirúrgica de urgencia evidenciando ruptura de aneurisma y endofuga tipo IB a nivel de la endoprotesis de aorta abdominal. Conclusión: la reparación endovascular, técnica de gran importancia para el manejo del aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA), tiene el riesgo de complicación por exclusión incompleta de flujo sanguíneo al saco aneurismático, con tasas de reintervención por complicación de 30% y conversión a manejo quirúrgico de 5%, aumentando la mortalidad.

Objective: to describe endoleaks as a late complication of endovascular prosthetic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA), through a case report presented at Hospital Universitario del Quindío San Juan de Dios Colombia. Study Design: case report. Case presentation: a 77-year-old man with past medical history of undergoing an EVAR of the left and right common iliac arteries for infra-renal AAA. Seven years later he was admitted to the emergency department with a sudden episode of hypotension, diaphoresis and abdominal pain. He underwent an emergency surgical intervention evidencing an AAA sac rupture secondary to a type IB peri-prosthetic endoleak. Conclusion: EVAR, a very important procedure for the management of AAA has the disadvantage of post-procedural complications due to failure to completely exclude blood flow perfusing the aneurysm sac, requiring a re-intervention in 30% and the need for open surgery in 5% associated with increased mortality rates.

Anticoagulación oral en reintervenciones endovasculares de la aorta / Oral Anticoagulation in Endovascular Aortic Reinterventions

RESUMEN Introducción: La endofuga es la principal causa de reintervención después del tratamiento endovascular de aorta. Algunos pacientes necesitan anticoagulación oral prolongada, lo cual puede aumentar la incidencia de endofugas posoperatorias. Objetivos: Nuestro objetivo es determinar si la anticoagulación oral posoperatoria tiene impacto en la incidencia de endofugas. Material y métodos: Este análisis retrospectivo incluyó todos los pacientes con aneurisma de aorta abdominal tratados por vía endovascular entre 2009 y 2014 en nuestro centro. Se determinaron dos grupos de pacientes de acuerdo con la necesidad de anticoagulación oral y se comparó entre ambos grupos la mortalidad relacionada con la aorta; la supervivencia libre de reintervenciones, de cualquier endofuga y de endofugas no tipo II; supervivencia libre de un punto final compuesto por mortalidad relacionada con la aorta, reintervenciones y endofugas, y la reducción del diámetro del saco aneurismático. Resultados: De 341 pacientes tratados, 33 (9,67%) estaban anticoagulados. No hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos en términos de mortalidad relacionada con la aorta (2,59% vs. 3,03%, p = ns), supervivencia libre de reintervenciones (84,04% vs. 86,2%; p = ns), supervivencia libre de cualquier endofuga (82% vs. 89%; p = 0,81) o supervivencia libre de endofugas no tipo II (88% vs. 88%; p = 0,52). Al analizar la supervivencia libre del punto final compuesto tampoco se encontraron diferencias significativas (80% vs. 85%; p = ns). La reducción promedio del diámetro del saco aneurismático fue de 5,19 mm y 3,51 mm (p = 0,2). Conclusiones: No se registró diferencia en ninguno de los resultados analizados. La anticoagulación oral posoperatoria no tuvo impacto en los resultados del tratamiento endovascular de aorta.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Endoleak is the main cause for reintervention after endovascular aortic repair. Some patientis need prolonged oral anticoagulation, which may increase the incidence of postoperative endoleaks. Objectives: Our objective was to determine whether postoperative oral anticoagulation has an impact on the incidence of endoleaks. Methods: This retrospective analysis included all patientis with endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm at our center between 2009 and 2014. Two groups of patientis were determined according to the need for oral anticoagulation. Aortic-related mortality, survival free from reinterventions, any endoleak and non-type II endoleaks, survival free of the composite endpoint of mortality associated with the aorta, reinterventions and endoleaks, and reduction of aneurysmal sac diameter was compared between both groups.Resultis: Among 341 treated patientis, 33 (9.67%) were anticoagulated. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of aorta-related mortality (2.59% vs. 3.03%, p=ns), reintervention-free survival (84.04% vs. 86.2%; p=ns), any endoleak- free survival (82% vs. 89%, p=0.81) or non-type II endoleak-free survival (88% vs. 88%, p=0.52). Similarly, no significant differences were found when analyzing the composite endpoint-free survival (80% vs. 85%, p=ns). The average reduction of aneurysmal sac diameter was 5.19 mm and 3.51 mm (p=0.2). Conclusions: No difference was registered in any of the resultis analyzed. Postoperative oral anticoagulation had no impact on the resultis of endovascular aortic treatment.

Revisión pictográfica de endoleaks (endofugas) / A pictorial review of endoleaks

The current treatment for aortic aneurysms is to install an endovascular stent in the aortic lumen. The most common complication of stents is endoleaks. Those defined as a peri-prosthetic vascular leak, in the aneurysm sac, are usually asymptomatic. If not detected early, they can progress with the growth and rupture of the aneurysm. The method of choice for evaluation is angiography by computed tomography (CT). The aim of this pictorial review is to describe and illustrate the imaging findings of the different types of endoleaks in computed tomography angiograms (5 types).

El tratamiento actual de los aneurismas aórticos es la instalación de una endoprótesis en el lumen aórtico por vía endovascular. La complicación más frecuente de las endoprótesis son los endoleaks. Los que se definen como flujo vascular peri-protésico, en el saco aneurismático, generalmente asintomático. De no ser detectados a tiempo, pueden progresar con el crecimiento y rotura del aneurisma. El método de elección para su evaluación es la angiografía mediante tomografía computada (TC). El objetivo de la presente revisión pictográfica es describir e ilustrar los hallazgos imaginológicos de los diferentes tipos de endoleaks en angiografía por tomografía computada (cinco tipos).