Value of endorectal ultrasonography and MRI examination in the preoperative evaluation of T staging and circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the value of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) and MRI examination in the preoperative evaluation of T staging and circumferential resection margin (CRM) of rectal cancer.Methods The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 193 patients [122 males and 71 females,age (60± 12)years with the range of 26-90 years] who underwent radical resection of rectal cancer at the First Hospital of Jilin University from May 2016 to January 2018 were collected.All patients underwent ERUS and MRI examination before surgery,total mesorectal excision during surgery and postoperative pathological examination.Postoperative pathological results as the gold standard,the sensitivity,specificity in T staging and the CRM diagnostic coincidence rate of rectal carcinoma by ERUS and MRI examination are evaluated.Observation indicators:(1) evaluation of T staging of rectal cancer by ERUS and MRI examination;(2) evaluation of CRM in rectal cancer by ERUS and MRI examination.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD.Sensitivity,specificity and coincidence rate were calculated by chi-square test of paired fourfold table.McNemar test was used to compare the coincidence rate of T staging between ERUS and MRI examination.Consistency between CRM measurement by ERUS examination and pathological examination of rectal cancer was conducted by Kappa analysis.Fisher exact probability test was used to compare the coincidence rate of positive CRM between ERUS and MRI examination.Results (1) Evaluation of T staging of rectal cancer by ERUS and MRI examination.The overall coincidence rate of T staging of rectal cancer and coincidence rates of T1,T2,T3,T4 staging by ERUS examination were 74.61％ (144/193),93.78％ (181/193),80.83％ (156/193),79.79％ (154/193) and 94.82％ (183/193),respectively.The sensitivity ofT1,T2,T3 and T4 staging was 55.56％ (10/18),77.50％ (31/40),78.46％ (102/130),20.00％ (1/5),and the specificity was 97.71％ (171/175),81.70％ (125/153),82.54％ (52/63),96.81％ (182/188),respectively.The overall coincidence rate of T staging of rectal cancer and coincidence rates of T1,T2,T3,T4 staging by MRI examination were 50.78％ (98/193),90.67％ (175/193),74.09％ (143/193),58.55％ (113/193) and 78.24％ (151/193),respectively.The sensitivity of T1,T2,T3 and T4 staging was 0 (0/18),17.50％ (7/40),68.46％ (89/130),40.00％ (2/5),and the specificity was 100.00％ (175/175),88.89％ (136/153),38.10％ (24/63),79.26％ (149/188),respectively.There was statistically significant difference between the overall coincidence rate of ERUS and MRI examination for T staging of rectal cancer (x2 =8.631,P＜0.05).(2) Evaluation of CRM in rectal cancer by ERUS and MRI examination.The sensitivity and specificity of positive CRM evaluation of rectal cancer by ERUS examination were 100.00％ (5/5) and 97.34％ (183/188) respectively,and the coincidence rate with results of pathological examination was 97.41％ (188/193),showing a high consistency between positive CRM evaluation of rectal cancer by ERUS examination and pathological examination (Kappa value =0.655,P ＜ 0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of positive CRM evaluation of rectal cancer by MRI examination were 40.00％ (2/5) and 92.02％ (173/188),and the coincidence rate with pathological examination was 90.67％ (175/193),respectively,showing a high consistency between positive CRM evaluation of rectal cancer by MRI and pathological examination (Kappa value =0.206,P＜0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the diagnostic coincidence rate and specificity of CRM positive evaluation for rectal cancer between ERUS and MRI examination (x2 =5.896,P＜0.05).Conclusion ERUS examination has a high coincidence rate in the preoperative T staging of rectal cancer and a high consistency between positive CRM evaluation of rectal cancer with pathological examination,which are superior to MRI examination in the two aspects.

Establishing the normal ranges of female and male anal canal and rectal wall vascularity with color Doppler anorectal ultrasonography / Estabelecendo padrões normais da vascularização do canal anal e da parede retal em indivíduos do sexo masculino e feminino com ultrassom anorretal com Doppler colorido

ABSTRACT Study objectives: To evaluate blood supply in the anal canal, rectal wall and mesorectal fat of men and women, using color Doppler endorectal sonography to establish normal ranges for vascular parameters. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary-care hospital recruited asymptomatic volunteers (≤50 years). Vascularity percentage and index were calculated for defined regions. Results: Vascularity percentage and index were significantly higher in the puborectalis, mid-level external and upper internal anal sphincter compared to the low anal canal; these parameters were higher in men than in women at upper and middle levels of the inner anal canal structures. At mid-level, vascularity was greater in the external compared to the internal anal sphincter in both sexes; however, at the upper level it was greater in the puborectalis compared to the internal anal sphincter in women. Vascularity was greater in the rectal wall compared to the mesorectal fat, with no difference between middle and lower levels. Conclusions: Blood supply is highest at upper levels of the anal canal; however, inner structures are better irrigated in men. Moreover, the rectal wall is better irrigated than the mesorectal fat. Establishing normal ranges may permit future comparisons of the studied structures in disease states as well as the hormonal and age related changes.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar vascularização do canal anal, parede retal e gordura mesorretal em homens e mulheres, usando ultrassonografia endorretal com Doppler colorido para estabelecer parâmetros vasculares de normalidade. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo transversal incluindo voluntários assintomáticos com até 50 anos. Medidos os valores da porcentagem e do índice de vascularização foram calculados para regiões escolhidas. Resultados: Valores da porcentagem e do índice foram significativamente maiores no puborretal, esfíncter externo (canal anal médio) e o esfíncter interno (canal anal superior) comparado ao canal anal inferior; esses parâmetros foram maiores em homens que em mulheres no canal anal médio e alto. No médio, a vascularização foi maior no esfíncter externo comparado ao interno em ambos os sexos; contudo, no canal anal superior, foi maior no puborretal comparado ao esfíncter anal interno em mulheres. A vascularização foi maior na parede retal comparada à gordura mesorretal, sem diferenças entre os níveis. Conclusões: O suprimento sanguíneo é maior nos níveis altos do canal anal. As estruturas internas são mais irrigadas nos homens. A parede retal é mais irrigada que a gordura mesorretal. Os parâmetros vasculares estabelecidos permitirá futuras comparações das estruturas estudadas nos casos de doenças, assim como, alterações que ocorrem com a idade e mudanças hormonais.

Utilidad del ultrasonido transrectal sin balón en la estadificación preoperatoria del cáncer rectal / Usefulness of the endorectal ultrasound without ballon in preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Objective: To determine the usefulness of Endorectal Ultrasound (ERUS) without balloon in preo-perative staging of malignant rectal tumors. Method: From July 2003 to July 2007 a study was performed in 57 patients diagnosed with cancer of the rectum, who underwent preoperative staging by transrectal ultrasonography to be subsequently compared with an anatomopathologic analysis of the surgical sample. Results: US staging according to degrees of invasion (T-stage) was coincident in 87,7 percent with the anatomopathologic staging. Sensitivity and specificity values were 0,80 and 0,92 percent respectively for UT2,while 0,94 and 0,81 percent, respectively, for UT3. According to regional lymph nodes spread (N-stage), it exhibited a coincidence of 78,9 percent; sensitivity was 0,82 percent and specificity was 0,74 per cent for UNO; while sensitivity and specificity reached values of 0,74 and 0,82 percent, respectively, for UN1. Conclusion: Endorectal US without balloon has proved to be useful in the preoperative staging of malignant rectal tumors.

Objetivos: Determinar la utilidad del ultrasonido transrectal sin balón (USTRsb) en la estadificación preoperatoria del cáncer rectal. Método: Estudiamos 57 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer rectal desde julio 2003 a Julio 2007, a los que se les realizó estadificación preoperatoria por ultrasonido transrectal y anatomopatológico por medio del examen de la pieza quirúrgica. Resultados: La estadificación ultrasonográfica según grado de invasión tumoral coincidió con la anatomopatológica en el 87,7 por ciento ; la sensibilidad y especificidad fue 0,80 y 0,92 para los UT2 y 0,94 y 0,81 para los UT3. Según la invasión de ganglios linfáticos regionales, la coincidencia fue 78,9 por ciento ; la sensibilidad y especificidad fue 0,82 y 0,74 para los UNO y 0,74 y 0,82para los UN1. Conclusión: El USTRsb fue útil en la estadificación preoperatoria del cáncer rectal.

The Efficacy of Endorectal Ultrasonography in the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The precise preoperative staging of rectal cancer is of great im-portance for the selection of an appropriate treatment. Endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) has been proven as an efficient tool for staging in rectal cancer. Moreover, its technical advancement has been enhancing resolution and applications. We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative staging using EUS in rectal cancer and examined whether staging by EUS was an efficient procedure. METHODS: EUS was performed in 79 patients with rectal cancer diagnosed by colonoscopic biopsy from January to December, 1996. Endoscopic examina-tion was used with Olympus, GF-UM20 and Br?l and Kjaer type 2001 Scanner. The staging by EUS was based on UICC classification. RESULTS: Preoperative staging by EUS was equal to pathologic staging in 70.9% (56/79) of cases. Overstaging was found in 17.7% (14/79) and downstaging in 11.4% (9/79). The prediction of lymph node metastases was accurate in 50 of 79 cases (63.3%). CONCLUSION: EUS seems to be an efficient diagnostic method to assess rectal cancer staging. More accurate imaging and further experience in the interpretation is needed to improve the efficacy of EUS.