RESUMEN
The study included gastric endoscopic biopsies received in the department of pathology, MMIMSR,Mullana, Haryana. 130 gastric biopsies were included in the study. The most common presentingcomplaint was pain abdomen. The neoplastic lesions commonly presented as carcinoma whereas thenon-neoplastic lesions presented as inflammatory lesions on endoscopy. Non-neoplastic lesions werefound to be common out of which gastritis was the most common lesion. Associated conditions werefound to be H. Pylori and intestinal metaplasia with gastritis. Majority of the lesions were nonneoplastic, presenting with pain abdomen & inflammatory findings on endoscopy. The neoplasticlesions comprised of adenocarcinoma & signet ring cell carcinoma. 4 cases of signet ring cell carcinomawere noted. Percentage of concordance between endoscopic & histologic diagnoses was calculatedwherein cases of gastritis, ulcer, polyps & carcinoma showed 100%, 96.3%, 71.4% & 100%concordance respectively.The conclusion of the study was that histological examination in adjunct with endoscopy should beconsidered as much more valuable diagnostic tool rather than endoscopy alone.
RESUMEN
The study included endoscopic duodenal biopsies received in the department of pathology, MMIMSR,Mullana, Haryana. 44 biopsies were included in the study. The most common presenting complaintwas pain abdomen followed by diarrhea. The neoplastic lesions commonly presented as carcinomawhereas the non-neoplastic lesions presented as inflammatory lesions on endoscopy. Non-neoplasticlesions were found to be common with villous atrophy predominating the list. Majority of the lesionswere non-neoplastic, presenting with pain abdomen & inflammatory findings on endoscopy. Theneoplastic lesions comprised of adenocarcinoma. A single case of ampullary carcinoma was alsonoted. Percentage of concordance between endoscopic & histologic diagnoses was calculated whereinduodenitis, scalloping, polypoidal & carcinomatous lesions showed 100%, 60.7%, 0% & 100%concordance between the two diagnostic modalities respectively. The conclusion of the study wasthat endoscopic examination alone might miss out in diagnosing majority of the lesions. So, histologicalexamination in adjunct with endoscopy should be considered as much more valuable diagnostic toolrather than endoscopy alone.
RESUMEN
Study 480 cases of rectocolon endoscopic biopsies, to compare the clinical features with the features and microscopic diagnosis. Results: the patients between 50 and 70 years old had the rate of highest catch a diseases and malignant lesions. There was no difference in the cancer ratio between male and female. The percentages of 4 groups included: malignant tumors, inflammatory lesions, polyps and benign tumors, were about 48%, 30%, 13.75% and 6.87%. Malignant tumors occur mainly in the rectum (65.36%) and in the sigmoid colon (9.95%). Most of malignant tumors in the colon and rectum (96%) were adenocarcinoma. The true-positive percentage of endoscopic diagnosis (confronted with microscopic finding) in the cancer group was 70.56%