RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate whether additional radical surgery is necessary following non-curative endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer.Method:Clinicopathological data in 104 patients following non-curative endoscopic resection of early colorectal coucer at the Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital between Jan 2011 and Dec 2021.Results:Lymph node metastasis and/or residual cancer was found in 23 patients (22%), including 12 cases of lymph node metastasis, 7 cases of residual cancer and 4 patients with both residual cancer and lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis indicated that vascular infiltration, positive vertical margin, and female gender were risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Risk factors for residual cancer were tumors ≥2 cm in size, negative lift sign, infiltration depth of ≥1 000 μm, and positive horizontal and vertical margins. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that vascular invasion, positive vertical margins, and being female were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis, while positive vertical margins was independent risk factor for residual cancer. Salvage surgery lasted for a median of 184 (156-233) minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 50 (20-100) ml and an average postoperative hospital stay of 9 (8-11) days. Seven cases of Clavein-Dindo Ⅱ or higher complications were observed, including pulmonary embolism in 1 case , anastomotic leakage in one, lymphatic fistula in one, bowel obstruction in 2 cases and urinary tract infection in 2 cases.Conclusion:Salvage surgery is mandatory for early endoscopic non-curative resection of colorectal cancer.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection with precutting(EMR-P)for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm(RNEN)smaller than 1 cm in diameter.Methods Clinical data of 177 patients with RNEN smaller than 1 cm in diameter from December 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different treatment protocols,177 patients with RNEN were divided into endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)group(n = 46),EMR-P group(n = 40)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)group(n = 91).The en bloc resection rate,complete resection rate,operation time,postoperative hospitalization time and incidence of operative complications among the three groups were compared.Results The complete resection rate in the EMR-P group(95.0%)and ESD group(97.8%)were significantly higher than that in the EMR group(87.0%)(P<0.05);The operation time in the EMR-P group(9.86±2.23)min was longer than that in the EMR group(4.12±0.88)min,EMR-P group and EMR group were shorter than that in the ESD group(19.55±3.67)min,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Postoperative hospitalization time in the EMR group was(2.45±0.29)d and EMR-P group was(2.43±0.23)d,which were shorter than that in the ESD group(3.30±0.32)d,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant difference in the rates of en bloc resection and operative complications among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion EMR-P for the treatment of RNEN<1 cm in diameter has the advantages,such as simple operation,short operation time and hospitalization time,high histological complete resection rate and low complication rate,which is worthy of clinical application.
RESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision(EMR-CI)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)for the rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm(RNEN).Methods Databases such as PubMed,the Cochrane Library,Embase,Web of Science,SinoMed,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang Data and Weipu database were searched by computer.The retrieval time limit was Nov.22,2022.The Chinese and English literatures on the efficacy of EMR-CI vs ESD in treatment of RNEN patients were collected.According to inclusion and exclusion criteria,the included literatures were screened,extracted data,and evaluated the methodological quality by Newcastle-Ottawa scale(NOS),Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.3 software.Results Seven clinical control studies were included,including 199 cases in the EMR-CI group and 443 cases in the ESD group.Results of Meta-analysis of validity outcome indicators,there was no significant difference in histological complete resection rate between the EMR-CI group and the ESD group(O(R) = 0.56,95%CI:0.30～1.02,P = 0.060);The endosopic complete resection rate of EMR-CI was similar to that of ESD with no significant difference(O(R) = 0.33,95%CI:0.09～1.17,P = 0.090);The size of lesions removed by EMR-CI was smaller than that of ESD with significant difference(WMD =-0.86,95%CI:-1.33～-0.40,P = 0.000);The time EMR-CI required to remove the lesion was significantly shorter than that of ESD(WMD =-12.48,95%CI:-16.42～-8.54,P = 0.000).The positive rate of horizontal resection margin of EMR-CI was similar to that of ESD,with no significant difference(O(R) = 1.74,95%CI:0.64～4.75,P = 0.280);The positive rate of vertical resection margin was significantly higher than that of ESD(O(R) = 2.41,95%CI:1.09～5.32,P = 0.030).Due to the low local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate,Meta-analysis couldn't be compared.Safety outcome index showed that,there were no significant differences in the incidence of total complications,bleeding and perforation among groups.Conclusion In the treatment of RNEN,EMR-CI can achieve the endosopic complete resection,histological complete resection and positive rate of horizontal resection margin similar to ESD without increasing surgical complications and significantly saving surgical time.However,attention should be paid to the differences between EMR-CI and ESD in positive rate of vertical resection margin.
RESUMEN
Objective:To explore the effect of cold-strap endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) in patients with colorectal polyps.Methods:A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to 320 selected patients with colorectal polyps diagnosed by Shenzhen Luohu District People′s Hospital from May 2019 to June 2021. The patients were randomly divided into CS-EMR group and HS-EMR group with 160 cases each, using a random number table generated by Excel 2007. The main parameters for statistical analysis contain the process indicators of the two groups of surgical methods, the complete polypectomy rate of patients after surgery, the degree of postoperative pain and the recovery of gastrointestinal function, and the differences in surgical complications.Results:The polypectomy time of CS-EMR group was shorter than that of HS-EMR group: (4.11 ± 1.20) min vs. (4.42 ± 0.98) min, with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The score of visual analogue pain scale (VAS) in CS-EMR group was lower than that in HS-EMR group at 4 and 12 hours after operation: (3.11 ± 0.78) scores vs. (3.48 ± 0.80) scores, (3.38 ± 0.80) scores vs. (3.61 ± 0.92) scores, with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The first anal exhaust time and first defecation time in CS-EMR group were lower than those in HS-EMR group: (27.83 ± 5.01) h vs. (29.66 ± 4.84) h, (43.73 ± 7.80) h vs. (47.28 ± 8.14) h, with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The complications in CS-EMR group were significantly lower than those in HS-EMR group: 5.63% (9/160) vs. 12.50% (20/160), with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The effect of CS-EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps is not different from that of HS-EMR, but the former has the advantages of short resection time, rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function after operation, light pain and less complications.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the efficiency and safety of modified endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) with moderate hiatus hernia.Methods:A total of 30 patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia (3-5 cm) diagnosed at the Department of Gastroenterology of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from June 2017 to June 2020 were randomly divided into 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group ( n=15) and 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group ( n=15) using random number table method, and received modified ARMS of the corresponding mucosal resection range. The GERD symptoms, esophagitis under endoscopy, 24 h pH results, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure were compared before and after the procedure. The therapeutic effect and complications of the two groups were analyzed. Results:In 2/3 resection group, the GERD questionnaire scores (9.53±0.36 VS 11.93±0.57, t=6.874, P<0.001), acid exposure time (19.81%±1.72% VS 31.45%±2.78%, t=8.020, P<0.001) and the DeMeester score based on 24 h esophageal pH monitoring (40.98±4.55 VS 55.33±5.65, t=6.408, P<0.001) at 6 months after the treatment showed a significant reduction compared with those before. In 3/4 resection group, the GERD questionnaire scores (9.0±0.57 VS 12.47±0.68, t=8.650, P<0.001), acid exposure time (20.07%±2.19% VS 29.96%±3.00%, t=7.444, P<0.001) and the DeMeester score (33.67±3.47 VS 51.17±6.03, t=4.973, P<0.001) at 6 months after the treatment were lower than those before. There was no significant difference in the GERD questionnaire scores ( t=0.790, P=0.436), acid exposure time ( t=0.093, P=0.926) or the DeMeester score ( t=1.278, P=0.212) between the two groups at 6 months after treatment. In the two groups, there was no significant difference in the ratio of esophagitis grade C and D (10/15 VS 5/15, χ2=3.894, P=0.063; 8/15 VS 4/15, χ2=2.778, P=0.125) or LES resting pressure [3.29 (2.66,8.29) mmHg VS 3.98 (3.67,9.43) mmHg, P=0.334;5.78 (1.9,8.46) mmHg VS 5.88 (3.28,8.99) mmHg, P=0.125] before and after the treatment. No postoperative delayed bleeding or perforation was observed. The incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis of 2/3 resection group was lower than that of the other group (1/15 VS 6/15, χ2=4.658, P=0.021). Conclusion:Modified ARMS is effective for controlling reflux symptoms and esophageal acid exposure in rGRED patients with moderate hiatus hernia (3-5 cm), but cannot significantly increase the postoperative resting pressure of LES. Compared with 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection, 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection can reduce the incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis.
RESUMEN
Objective:To compare the histopathological features and treatment efficacy of different methods for metachronous early gastric cancer (MEGC) in the remnant stomach.Methods:A total of 66 patients [38 endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 28 gastrectomy] with MEGC in the remnant stomach from January 2014 to December 2020 in Drum Tower Hospital were divided into the ESD group and the gastrectomy group. The baseline characteristics, histopathological features, treatment efficacy, and cost differences of the two groups were analyzed.Results:The MEGC in the remnant stomach mostly occurred in elderly male patients, with the mean age of 69.7±8.5 years. The mean interval of the occurrence of MEGC in the remnant stomach was 6 years. As for the tumor location, the gastric body (31.6%) was the main location in the ESD group and gastric cardia (53.6%) in the gastrectomy group with significant difference ( χ2=11.07, P=0.026). The mean operation time, hospital stay, postoperative fasting time, and total treatment cost were 80.0 min, 6.0 d, 1.5 d, ￥19 436 in the ESD group and 215.0 min, 19.0 d, 6.5 d, and ￥68 665 in the gastrectomy group, respectively, with significant differences between the two groups ( P<0.05). The overall survival rate during follow-up was 76.3% in the ESD group and 71.4% in the gastrectomy group with no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=0.736, P=0.778). In terms of postoperative complications, the incidences of bleeding and infection were 7.9% and 5.3% in the ESD group, and those of obstruction and infection were both 14.3% in the gastrectomy group. There was significant difference in the incidences of postoperative obstruction between the two groups ( P<0.05). Conclusion:ESD is safe and effective for MEGC in the remnant stomach and is better than gastrectomy in terms of the treatment cost and operation time, but the long-term efficacy still needs to be validated by large-scale prospective studies.
RESUMEN
Objective To observe the effects of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange(THRIVE)on gastric air intake and SpO2 in patients with painless endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)of colorectal polyps.Methods Seventy patients with painless colorectal polyps EMR,36 males,34 females,aged 18-64 years,BMI 18-25 kg/m2,ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ.The patients were divided into two groups:high-flow oxygen inhalation group(group T)and conventional oxygen inhalation group(group C)by random number table method,35 cases in each group.Patients in group T were given THRIVE oxygen inhalation,and patients in group C were routinely inhaled oxygen through the nose.During anesthesia,the BIS value was maintained at 50-65.Bedside gastric ultrasonography was used to observe the gastric content and gastric air intake of patients.The HR and resting SpO2 in the supine position were recorded 5 minutes before the surgery(rest for 5 minutes),1 minute after entering the endoscope,when entering the endoscope to the ileocecal valve,and at the end of the surgery.The PaCO2,PaO2 and pH values were recorded 5 mi-nutes before surgery,when entering the endoscope to the ileocecal valve,and at the end of the surgery,so were gastric intake and satiety,and antral cross-sectional area(CSA)for 5 minutes before surgery and after surgery.The occurrence of mild,moderate,and severe hypoxia during anesthesia were recorded.The opera-tion time,the amount of propofol used during the operation,the number of dosage times of remifentanil,PACU residence time,and infusion during surgery,the occurrence of adverse reactions such as hypotension,hypertension,bradycardia,reflux aspiration,postoperative nausea and vomiting,and the sat-isfaction score of digestive endoscopy physicians and patients were recrded.Results Compared with group C,SpO2 in group T was significantly increased 1 minutes after entering the endoscope(P＜0.05),and PaCO2 was significantly decreased at the time of entering the endoscope to the ileocecal valve and the end of the surgery(P＜0.05),the incidence of mild and moderate hypoxia was significantly reduced in group T(P＜0.05).No positive gastric air intake and full stomach were found in both groups at rest for 5 minutes and after the surgery.There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions and patient satisfaction scores between the two groups.The satisfaction score of endoscopists in group T was significantly higher than that in group C(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional nasal catheter oxygen inhalation,THRIVE ventilation does not cause hypercapnia or affect gastric intake and stomach content,does reduce the occurrence of mild to moderate hypoxia in patients undergoing painless EMR,does not in-crease the risk of reflux aspiration,and has a higher satisfaction of digestive endoscopy physicians.
RESUMEN
Background:Studies have confirmed that colorectal tumors may be caused by normal mucosa near or inside the diverticulum,and patients with colon diverticulum are more likely to develop colon cancer than those without diverticulum.When colorectal adenoma involves diverticulum,the inflammatory state in the diverticulum will increase the risk of adenomatous dysplasia.Therefore,adenomas involving colon diverticulum are more likely to develop malignant changes,and adenomas involving colon diverticulum need to be resected to avoid colon cancer outcomes.Improved prognosis.Aims:To explore the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)treatment of colorectal tumors near or involving a diverticulum.Methods:Fourteen consecutive cases of adenoma(near or involving a diverticulum)during EMR treatment from Jun.2018 to Jan.2022 were collected,and analyze their clinical characteristics and outcomes.The main outcomes were adverse events,including bleeding,perforation,and electrocoagulation syndrome,while the secondary outcome was the total resection rate,block resection rate and local recurrence rate.Results:Among the 14 patients with colon adenoma,1 case was inside the diverticulum,13 cases were near the diverticulum,the diameter of the lesion was(0.76±0.25)cm,the operation time was(19.6±5.33)min.The main tissue types were tubular adenomas,and the pathologic characteristics were low grade intraepithelial neoplasia.Among the complications,delayed hemorrhage was found in 1 case(7.1%),the patient had a history of taking antiplatelet drugs(clopidogrel),electrocoagulation syndrome was found in 1 case(7.1%),and appendiceal orifice and diverticulum were involved in this patient,with no perforation event.The whole resection rate and the complete resection rate were 100%(14/14).Within 1 year after surgery,10 patients came to the hospital for re-examination of colonoscopy,and no local recurrence was found.Conclusions:EMR treatment involving colonic diverticulum adenoma is safe and effective.However,patients with adenoma involving antiplatelet drugs and appendiceal orifice and diverticulum should be alert to postoperative complications.
RESUMEN
Objective:To analyze the endoscopic and pathological features of laterally spreading tumors (LST) and to explore the risk factors for carcinogenesis and submucosal invasion.Methods:From January 2019 to August 2021, the gender, age, endoscopic and pathological characteristics of patients with colorectal LST who underwent endoscopic treatment in the First Hospital of China Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis was used to determine the risk factors for carcinogenesis and submucosal invasion, and the factors with significant differences were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results:A total of 422 patients were enrolled, including 224 males and 198 females, with the mean age of 63.45±9.23 years. A total of 456 LST lesions were detected. The length of endoscopic resection specimens was 3.01 ± 0.48 cm and the length of lesions was 2.37±1.59 cm. One hundred and fifteen (25.2%) lesions were located in the rectum, 40 (8.8%) in the sigmoid colon, 26 (5.7%) in the descending colon, 109 (23.9%) in the transverse colon, 112 (24.6%) in the ascending colon, 54 (11.8%) in the caecum. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR), EMR with pre-cutting, and ESD with snare were performed in 237 (52.0%), 95 (20.8%), 113 (24.8%) and 11 (2.4%) lesions. Hemorrhage occurred in 4 lesions and perforations occurred in 5. Pathological results showed 119 cases (26.1%) of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 221 cases (48.5%) of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 82 cases (18.0%) of intramucosal carcinoma, and 34 cases (7.5%) of submucosal invasive carcinoma. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion more than 2 cm, the location of the lesion in the rectum, the endoscopic classification of LST-NG pseudodepressed type (LST-NG-PD), LST-G homogenous type (LST-G-H) and LST-G nodular mixed type (LST-G-M), and the presence of large nodules were independent risk factors for carcinogenesis. Endoscopic classification of LST-NG-PD and LST-G-M and the presence of large nodules were independent risk factors for submucosal infiltration.Conclusion:There are significant differences in the endoscopic and pathological features of the four subtypes of LST. The size and the location of the lesion, the endoscopic classification and the presence of large nodules are independent risk factors for carcinogenesis. Endoscopic classification and the presence of large nodules are independent risk factors for submucosal infiltration. Endoscopic treatment of LST is safe and effective with less complications. Different endoscopic treatment methods have their own advantages.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the value of non-injection mucosal resection for Paris type 0-Ⅰ colon polyps with a long diameter less than 2 cm.Methods:At the Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, patients with type 0-Ⅰcolonic polyps of a long diameter less than 2 cm who underwent non-submucosal injection resection from January 2019 to December 2019 were enrolled as the non-injection group, and those who received endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the same period were enrolled as the control (EMR group). The differences in complete resection rate, operation time, complication incidence and 1-year follow-up polyp detection rate between the two groups were compared.Results:A total of 373 patients were treated with non-injection mucosal resection and 743 patients with conventional EMR. There was no significant difference in gender [68.6% (256/373) VS 64.6% (480/743) for male, χ2=1.796], age (56.2±11.8 years VS 57.4±11.2 years, t=-1.984), number of polyps (1.5±0.9 VS 1.4±0.8, t=1.776), polyp distribution [48.0% (269/561) VS 34.6% (362/1 045) in right colon, χ2=3.364], lesion diameter less than 1 cm [80.0% (449/561) VS 76.9% (804/1 045), χ2=2.043] between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time in the non-injection group was 2.82±1.70 min, which was shorter than that in the EMR group (4.94±2.54 min) with significant difference ( t=-16.489, P<0.001). The number of metal clips used in the non-injection group was 0.90±0.68, which was less than that in the EMR group (1.30±0.73, t=-8.971, P<0.001). The en bloc resection rates of lesions in non-injection group and EMR group were both 100.0%. The complete resection rate of non-injection group was 97.3% (546/561), which was not significantly different from that of EMR group [98.1% (1 025/1 045), χ2=0.749, P=0.387]. There was no significant difference in the incidences of delayed bleeding in the two groups [0.0% (0/373) VS 0.8% (6/743), P=0.187]. No intraoperative or delayed perforation in either group occurred. There was no significant difference in the incidence of electrocoagulation syndrome between the two groups [0.8% (3/373) VS 0.7% (5/743), P=0.534]. A total of 63 patients in the non-injection group underwent colonoscopy review within the set period, and the polyp detection rate was 41.2% (26/63). A total of 178 patients in the EMR group also underwent colonoscopy review, and the polyp detection rate was 53.9% (96/178). There was no significant difference in the polyp detection rate between the two groups ( χ2=2.985, P>0.05). Conclusion:Non-submucosal injection resection is safe and effective for Paris type 0-Ⅰ colon polyps with a long diameter less than 2 cm, which can significantly shorten the operation time and is worth of clinical promotion.
RESUMEN
Objective:To establish new scar-endoscopic submucosal dissection (scar-ESD) classification based on the relationship between scars and lesion location under endoscopy, and to explore the clinical efficacy of ESD.Methods:Clinical data of 132 patients who underwent ESD with scars from January 2015 to August 2022 at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine. According to the scar-ESD classification, the lesions without surgical anastomosis at the same location were classified as type A: A0, A1, A2, and A3; and those with surgical anastomosis were classified as type B: B0, B1, and B2. The ESD operation time, specimen size, intraoperative assistant methods, intraoperative perforation, en-bloc resection rate, specimen damage rate, and postoperative complications were recorded for each subtype.Results:The age of the 132 patients was 64.22±9.51, with a male-to-female ratio of 3∶1. Forty-nine lesions (37.12%) were located in the esophagus, 40 cases (30.30%) in the stomach, and 43 cases (32.58%) in the colon. The operation time was 49.66±32.96 minutes. The operation time for A0 subtype was 30.38±12.85 minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of the A2 (52.10±36.55 minutes, t=2.15, P<0.05). The operation time for B0 subtype was 45.03±24.35 minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of the B2 (90.71±44.95 minutes, t=3.95, P<0.05). Intraoperative assistance was used in 38 cases (28.79%). Intraoperative perforation occurred in 5 cases (3.79%), including 4 cases of A2 and 1 case of A3, and the highest incidence occurred in the colon [9.30% (4/43)]. The en-bloc resection rate was 97.73% (129/132), the R0 resection rate was 88.64% (117/132), and the curative resection rate was 84.09% (111/132). The specimen damage occurred in 23 cases (17.42%), with the highest incidence in the stomach [32.50% (13/40)]. There were significant differences between A2 and A0 subtypes ( t=2.31, P<0.05) in this variable, and between B2 subtype and A0, A1, A2, A3, and B0 subtypes ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The scar-ESD classification is beneficial for describing and predicting difficulty of ESD. ESD is still the preferred treatment for early digestive lesions with scars, and the efficacy is satisfactory. But it requires experienced physicians to perform the operation.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is among the most common malignancies worldwide. Colonoscopy is the examination of choice for the prevention of CRC because of its great diagnostic and, especially, therapeutic capacity in relation to adenomatous lesions. AIMS: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence, macroscopic, and histological characteristics of polypoid rectal lesions resected through endoscopic techniques and assess whether endoscopic therapy is safe and efficient for treating lesions located in the rectum. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study with an analysis of the medical records of all patients undergoing resection of rectal polyps. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients with rectal lesions were evaluated, with 59 men and 64 women of mean age 56 years. All patients underwent endoscopic resection: 70% with polypectomy and 30% with wide mucosectomy. Complete colonoscopy with removal of the entire rectal lesion occurred in 91%, while in 5% the preparation was inadequate and poor clinical conditions were an impeditive factor, and in 4% surgical treatment was indicated because there was an infiltrative lesion with central ulceration. Histological evaluation showed adenomas in 3.25%, hyperplasia in 7.32%, and hamartoma in 0.81%; low-grade dysplasia was identified in 34.96%, high-grade dysplasia in 51.22%, and adenocarcinoma in 1.63%, while one case (0.81%) was classified as erosion. CONCLUSIONS: Polyps in the rectum are common and were found in 37% of these colonoscopies. Adenomas with dysplasia were the most common form of Colorectal cancer . Therapeutic colonoscopy proved to be a safe and efficient method for the complete treatment of rectal lesions.
RESUMO RACIONAL: O câncer colorretal (CCR) está entre as neoplasias mais comuns em todo o mundo. A colonoscopia é o exame de escolha para prevenção por sua grande capacidade diagnóstica e, principalmente, terapêutica em relação às lesões adenomatosas. OBJETIVOS: Analisar a prevalência, as características macroscópicas e histológicas das lesões polipoides retais ressecadas por técnicas endoscópicas e avaliar se a terapia endoscópica é segura e eficaz para o tratamento de lesões localizadas no reto. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional retrospectivo com análise dos prontuários de todos os pacientes submetidos à ressecção de pólipos retais. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 123 pacientes com lesões retais: 59 homens e 64 mulheres com idade média de 56 anos. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à ressecção endoscópica: 70% com polipectomia e 30% com mucosectomia ampla. A colonoscopia completa com retirada de toda a lesão retal ocorreu em 91%, enquanto em 5% o preparo foi inadequado e as más condições clínicas foram fator impeditivo, e em 4% o tratamento cirúrgico foi indicado por haver lesão infiltrativa com ulceração central. A avaliação histológica mostrou adenomas em 3,25%, hiperplasia em 7,32% e hamartoma em 0,81%; displasia de baixo grau foi identificada em 34,96%, displasia de alto grau em 51,22% e adenocarcinoma em 1,63%, enquanto um caso (0,81%) foi classificado como erosão. CONCLUSÕES: Pólipos no reto são comuns e foram encontrados em 37% das colonoscopias. Adenomas com displasia foram a forma mais comum de câncer colorretal. A colonoscopia terapêutica mostrou-se método seguro e eficiente para o tratamento completo das lesões retais.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Background: Endoscopic treatment of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer has been widely accepted in recent years. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), following established indication criteria, can lead to cure of the disease in more than 90% of cases. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the use of ESD in patients with early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, as well as the results of the procedure, its complications and effectiveness in controlling the disease. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study composed of 41 patients aged from 53 to 87 years (mean age: 65 years; 58.53% male) who were analyzed from 2008 to 2019. The variables collected from the medical records were: comorbidities, classification of the lesion regarding resection criteria, type of resection, histology, degree of invasion, resection margin, complications, disease recurrence. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, the McNemar's test, and the Mann-Whitney test, with 5% statistical significance (P<0.05). Results: The most frequent site of the lesion was the gastric antrum and the predominant presentation by the Japanese or Paris classification was the one with depressed components in 56.09%. Adenocarcinoma occurred in 75.6% of the biopsies, and the remainder were adenomas without neoplasia. En-bloc resection occurred in 97.57% of cases, and compromise of the safety margin occurred in one patient. The main pre-existing comorbidity was liver cirrhosis in 29.26% of cases. There was a significant increase in post- ESD adenocarcinoma compared to pre-resection diagnosis. The mean follow-up time was 38.4 months, with one recurrence (2.43%) and two metachronous lesions (4.87%). Complications during and after the procedure occurred in three patients (7.31%), being due to bleeding (two cases) and perforation (one case). There was one death due to a cardiac event not directly related to the procedure. Conclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection proved to be a safe procedure, with a low complication and recurrence rate. Its recommendation must occur within the established criteria; however, it can be indicated for patients outside the criteria, if there is a high risk for surgical treatment.
RESUMO Contexto: O tratamento endoscópico das lesões pré-cancerosas e do câncer gástrico precoce tem sido amplamente aceito nos últimos anos. A dissecção endoscópica da submucosa (submucosectomia), obedecendo a critérios estabelecidos de indicação, pode levar a cura da doença em mais de 90% dos casos. Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o uso da dissecção submucosa endoscópica em pacientes com câncer gástrico precoce e lesões pré-cancerosas, bem como os resultados do procedimento, suas complicações e eficácia no controle da doença. Métodos: Foram analisados 41 pacientes, com idade variando de 53 a 87 anos (média de 65 anos), sendo 58,53% do sexo masculino, no período de 2008 a 2019, sendo este estudo do tipo coorte retrospectivo. As variáveis coletadas dos prontuários foram: comorbidades, classificação da lesão quanto aos critérios de ressecção, tipo de ressecção, histologia, grau de invasão, margem de resseção, complicações, recidiva de doença. A análise estatística foi feita com o uso do teste de Kruskal-Wallis, teste de McNemar e teste de Mann-Whitney, com significância estatística de 5% (P<0,05). Resultados: O local mais frequente da lesão foi o antro gástrico e a apresentação predominante pela classificação japonesa ou de Paris foram os com componentes deprimidos em 56,09%. O adenocarcinoma ocorreu em 75,6% das biópsias e o restante foram adenomas sem neoplasia. A ressecção em bloco ocorreu em 97,57% dos casos, e o comprometimento da margem de segurança ocorreu em um paciente. A principal comorbidade pré-existente foi a cirrose hepática em 29,26% dos casos. Houve um aumento significativo de adenocarcinoma após dissecção endoscópica da submucosa em comparação ao diagnóstico pré ressecção. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 38,4 meses, sendo registrado uma recidiva (2,43%) e duas lesões metacrônicas (4,87%). As complicações durante e após o procedimento ocorreram em 3 (7,31%) pacientes, sendo por sangramento (dois casos) e perfuração (um caso). Houve um óbito por evento cardiológico, não relacionado diretamente com o procedimento. Conclusão: A ressecção endoscópica da submucosa mostrou ser procedimento seguro, com baixa taxa de complicação e de recidiva. A sua indicação deve ser dentro dos critérios estabelecidos, entretanto, pode ser indicada em pacientes fora de critérios, se há alto risco para o tratamento cirúrgico.
RESUMEN
Antecedentes: La detección y resección de lesiones colónicas elevadas (pólipos) sésiles o planas, con polipectomía clásica o compleja detiene la secuencia adenoma-cáncer. La mucosectomía endoscópica (EMR) fue introducida en los setentas y perfeccionada en los ochentas como un procedimiento avanzado para el tratamiento de pólipos grandes o complejos. Una adecuada realización de la técnica puede evitar procedimientos quirúrgicos mayores. Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados y complicaciones de la técnica de mucosectomía (EMR) realizada por gastroenterólogos-endoscopistas en un centro de referencia del Perú. Revisión de indicaciones, éxito, complicaciones y seguimiento. Material y método: Se realizó un análisis descriptivo, retrospectivo y observacional de pacientes tratados con técnica de mucosectomía endoscópica en un centro de endoscopia de referencia nacional en Lima, Perú, desde enero de 2004 a diciembre de 2018. Se aplicó la técnica de elevación y corte controlado en lesiones polipoideas mayores a 1 cm. Se realizó la resección en bloque en lesiones hasta 3 cms y técnica de "piecemeal" o sacabocado en mayores de 3 cms. Se evaluaron resultados, eventos adversos y recurrencia. Resultados: Se analizaron 756 lesiones en el mismo número de pacientes. Hombres 46.8 % (298) y mujeres 53.2 % (338). La edad promedio fue de 61.9 (rangos 37-91). El tamaño promedio de las lesiones fue de 20,3 mm (10 - 50 mm). El tiempo promedio por procedimiento fue de 46 minutos (rango 20-123 minutos). Se logró resección en bloque en 78.04 % de pólipos (590 lesiones). Se realizó técnica sacabocado en 166 (21.96 %) lesiones. La tasa de complicaciones en nuestra serie fue del 6.74 %, todos manejados endoscópicamente más tratamiento conservador médico sin cirugía. El seguimiento promedio fue de 18 meses (3 - 24 meses) y la tasa global de recidiva local fue de 2.49 %. El tratamiento quirúrgico post procedimiento y con pieza analizada se indicó en 15 casos por adenomas avanzados con adenocarcinoma intramucoso bien diferenciado (ADCA-IM). A los 12 meses, 13 de 15 recidivas fueron tratadas endoscópicamente y 2 casos refractarios fueron operados. Conclusiones: La mucosectomía (RME ó EMR) es un procedimiento que, realizado por endoscopistas-gastroenterólogos bien entrenados muestra baja tasa de recurrencia y complicaciones aisladas permitiendo la obtención de adecuado material para el estudio anátomo-patológico y reduciendo necesidad de cirugía abierta o laparoscópica.
Background: Detection and resection of colonic polypoid sessile and flat lesions, prevents the development of colon cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has emerged in the 70´s and improved in the 80´s, as an alternative treatment of this lesions and is considered the procedure of choice nowadays, being able to avoid major surgical procedures. Objectives: Evaluation of the results and complications of the technique by endoscopists of a reference center. Review of indications and limitations of the technique. Material and methods: Descriptive, retrospective and observational analysis of patients treated with endoscopic mucosal resection technique at a referral center in Lima, Peru, between January 2004 and December 2018. EMR Technique was used in polypoid lesions greater than 1 cm. The bloc resection and the piecemeal resection technique was used for those lesions up to 3 cm and more. We evaluated complications and results according to the technique as recurrence rate, performing tracking in all cases with endoscopic follow up. Results: 756 lesions and patients (338 women and 298 men) The average age was 61.9 years (37-91 years) and the average lesion size of 20.3 mm (10-50 mm). En bloc or one-piece resection was performed in 78.04 %(590) and piece meal in 21.96%(166) achieving endoscopic and pathological resection. The complication rate in our series was 6.74% and managed endoscopically and with conservative measures and no surgery. Mean follow-up was 18 months (3-24 months) and overall local recurrence rate was 2.49%. After-procedure, additional surgical treatment was performed in 15 cases with pathologic piece report and intramucous adenocarcinoma (IM-ADCA). 13 of 15 local recurrences at 12 months follow up were treated endoscopically and 2 had surgical treatment. Conclusions: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or Mucosectomy is a technique performed by experts endoscopists and shows low rates of recurrence and complications with suitable material for pathologic examination. It reduces open and laparoscopic surgery.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an easy-to-use treatment option for superficial colorectal lesions, including lesions ≥20 mm. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of EMR. Methods We evaluated 430 lesions removed by EMR in 404 patients. The lesions were analyzed according to their morphology, size, location, and histology. Lesions <20 mm were resected en bloc, whereas lesions ≥20 mm were removed by piecemeal EMR (p-EMR). Adverse events and recurrence were assessed. Results Regarding morphology, 145 (33.7%) were depressed lesions, 157 (36.5%) were polypoid lesions and 128 (29.8%) were laterally spreading lesions, with 361 (84%) lesions <20 mm and 69 (16%) ≥20 mm. Regarding histology, 413 (96%) lesions were classified as neoplastic lesions. Overall, 14 (3.3%) adverse reactions occurred, most commonly in lesions removed by p-EMR (P<0.001) and associated with advanced histology (P=0.008). Recurrence occurred in 14 (5.2%) cases, more commonly in lesions removed by p-EMR (P<0.001). Conclusion EMR is an effective technique for the treatment of superficial colorectal lesions, even of large lesions.
RESUMO Contexto Ressecção endoscópica da mucosa (REM) é uma opção fácil para o tratamento das lesões superficiais do cólon e reto, inclusive para as lesões ≥20 mm de diâmetro. Objetivo Avaliar a efetividade da REM. Métodos Este estudo prospectivo observacional avaliou 430 lesões ressecadas por REM em 404 pacientes. As lesões foram analisadas de acordo com a morfologia, tamanho, localização e histologia. Lesões <20 mm foram removidas em bloco, enquanto lesões ≥20 mm foram ressecadas em piecemeal REM (p-REM). Eventos adversos e recorrência foram avaliados. Resultados Quanto à morfologia, 145 (33,7%) eram lesões deprimidas, 157 (36,5%) eram lesões polipoides e 128 (29,8%) eram lesões que se espalham lateralmente, com 361 (84%) lesões <20 mm e 69 (16%) ≥20 mm. Em relação à histologia, 413 (96%) foram classificadas como lesões neoplásicas. Globalmente tivemos 14 (3,3%) de reações adversas, mais presente nas lesões ≥20 mm removidas por p-REM (P<0,001) e associadas com histologia avançada (P=0,008). A recorrência ocorreu em 14 (5,2%) casos, sendo mais observada em lesões removidas por p-REM (P<0,001). Conclusão REM é uma técnica efetiva para o tratamento das lesões colorretais superficiais, até mesmo para as grandes lesões.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the efficiency and safety of endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) in the absence of hiatus hernia (HH).Methods:Among 28 rGERD patients adimitted to Gastrointestinal Medical Center, Subei People's Hospital from Jan 2018 to Jun 2020 16 underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 12 did endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), The GERD symptoms, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results, manometry, were compared before and after the procedure.Results:ARMS was successfully performed in all 28 patients. Three months after ARMS, 19 patients discontinued the use of pump inhibitors (PPIs), while 9 patients reduced their PPI dose. The GERD questionnaire scores, the median gastroesophageal flap valve grade, the median DeMeester score and acid exposure time based on 24 h esophageal pH monitoring were significantly lower than those before treatment [6.5±2.5 vs.13.4±3.1, 1(1-2) vs.3(1-3), 14.8(8.2-30) vs.34.6(16.2-60.7), 4.4%(1.3%-7.9%) vs. 8.7%(6.2%-13.9%),all P<0.01]. Esophageal sphincter pressure increased after ARMS, from (9.0±3.2) mmHg to (15.5±5.5) mmHg ( t=0.159, P<0.01). The operation time used in ESD was (66.9±4.5) minutes compared to EMR [(29.1±2.0) minutes]( t=13.911, P<0.001). The treatment cost of ESD was (19.9±1.6) thousand yuan vs. for EMR [(9.0±1.6) thousand yuan]( t=58.411, P<0.001). There were no major complications in both groups. Conclusions:ARMS is safe and effective for treatment of rGERD in the absence of HH, and EMR is less time-consuming and more acceptable technique.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the endoscopic therapeutic effect on Barrett esophagus (BE) with special intestinal metaplasia.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on data of 56 patients of BE with special intestinal metaplasia who were diagnosed in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2017 to December 2019 and treated with endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The postoperative bleeding rate, feeding obstruction rate, operative time, hospital stay and residual or recurrent intestinal metaplasia lesions were studied.Results:There were no significant differences between the ERFA group ( n=43) and the EMR group ( n=13) in terms of age, gender, length of BE, preoperative gastrointestinal symptoms and comorbidity ( P>0.05). The postoperative bleeding rate [23.1% (3/13) VS 0, P=0.010] and feeding obstruction rate [30.8% (4/13) VS 4.7% (2/43), P=0.022] were higher in the EMR group compared with those in the ERFA group, and the operative time [6.0 (5.6, 6.2) min VS 5.4 (5.2, 5.5) min, Z=4.95, P<0.001] and hospital stay [6.0 (5, 7) d VS 3.5 (3, 4) d, Z=5.76, P<0.001] were longer in the EMR group. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative pain or fever between the two groups ( P>0.05). No residual or recurrent intestinal metaplasia lesions were observed during the follow-up in any EMR patient, and follow-up biopsies after the first treatment in the ERFA group revealed residual intestinal metaplasia lesions in 41.9% (18/43) patients, with a significant difference ( P=0.005). Conclusion:EMR is more thorough in the treatment of BE with special intestinal metaplasia, while ERFA is more widely used in clinical practice for simpler operation, shorter operative time, and less postoperative complications.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopy for early cancer of duodenal papilla.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from 23 consecutive patients with early cancer of duodenal papilla, who underwent endoscopic treatment from January 2015 to January 2021 in Beijing Friendship Hospital. Baseline data, endoscopic and pathological data, occurrence and outcome of complications were studied.Results:Twenty-three patients successfully received endoscopic treatment. The maximal diameter of lesions evaluated under endoscopy was 1.90±0.83 cm. Among the 23 cases, 20 underwent endoscopic mucosal resection and 3 underwent endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. Delayed bleeding occurred in 5 cases (21.7%), 3 patients (13.0%) developed postoperative hyperamylasemia, 6 patients (26.1%) developed mild acute pancreatitis, and 1 patient (4.3%) had pancreatic duct stent displacement after the operation, which improved after medical or endoscopic treatment. No perforation occurred during the perioperative period. In terms of final pathology, the en bloc resection rate was 82.6% (19/23), and the complete resection rate was 78.3% (18/23). Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography showed that 19 lesions were confined to the mucosal layer, which were all demonstrated by postoperative pathology. Four other cases were suspected to be involved in the submucosa or the end of the pancreaticobiliary duct under endoscopic ultrasonography, two of which were confined to the mucosal layer, and the other 2 cases involved the submucosal layer, so additional surgery was performed. A total of 18 patients were followed up, among whom 14 achieved complete resection of postoperative pathology, and 2 patients (14.3%, 2/14) were found to have recurrence at 12 and 51 months respectively after the treatment and did not relapse after surgical treatment and endoscopic treatment respectively. Among 4 other patients of follow-up whose pathology did not achieve complete resection, 1 had no recurrence, and the other 3 received additional surgical treatment without recurrence.Conclusion:Endoscopic treatment for early cancer of duodenal papilla is safe and effective. It is necessary to improve preoperative evaluation, stay alert to perioperative complications, and pay attention to regular postoperative endoscopic follow-up.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic treatment for early nonampullary duodenal cancer.Methods:Data of patients with early nonampullary duodenal cancer, who underwent endoscopic treatment from January 2015 to January 2021 at Beijing Friendship Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline data, endoscopic treatment methods, wound closure, pathology, the occurrence and outcome of complications of patients were studied.Results:A total of 47 patients who successfully went through endoscopic treatment were enrolled. Seventeen cases received endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 5 cases received endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and 7 cases received ESD+EMR (hybrid ESD). Six cases were converted to hybrid ESD due to difficulty in ESD. Four cases received full-thickness resection with over-the-scope clip system (OTSC), and 8 cases received endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR). Among the 47 cases of early cancer, the en bloc resection rate was 83.0% (39/47), and the complete resection rate was 85.1% (40/47). Four patients (8.5%) had perforation which occurred at the duodenal descending part during the perioperative period, among whom, 2 patients (4.3%) recovered after endoscopic treatment, 2 others (4.3%) recovered after surgical intervention. There were no complications such as postoperative bleeding or infection during the perioperative period.Conclusion:Endoscopic treatment for early nonampullary duodenal cancer is safe and effective. A specific treatment plan can be selected according to the location, size and specific conditions of the lesion. For the operation of the descending part, it is necessary to be more vigilant to against the occurrence of perforation complications.
RESUMEN
From January 2016 to December 2020, 6 cases of polyps in the appendix cavity with a diameter of 0.3-1.3 cm were treated by endoscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. All 6 cases underwent endoscopic treatment successfully, including 3 cases of en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 1 case of piecemeal EMR, 1 case of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and 1 case of removed by cold forceps. No complications such as bleeding, perforation, infection or acute appendicitis occurred.The wound healed well with no recurrence after re-examination in 3 cases, and 3 others were not re-examined by colonoscopy yet. The results preliminarily confirmed that endoscopic treatment of intraluminal polyps in the appendix cavity is safe and effective.