Stent assisted percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy for treating infected pancreatic necrosis / 中华胰腺病杂志

Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of stent-assisted percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (SAPEN) in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). Methods The patients with severe acute pancreatitis ( SAP) who received the treatment of SAPEN for IPN were sequentially included from January 2018 to September 2018 in the Eastern Theater General Hospital of People's Liberation Army. The demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The mortality and incidence of major organ dysfunctions were used as the primary observation endpoints. Results A total of 40 IPN patients were enrolled including 27 men and 13 women. The percutaneous covered stent placement procedures were successful in all cases;the median number of SAPEN operations was 1 ( range 1-3 ) , and no operation-related complications occurred. 32 patients were successfully cured by SAPEN, and the treatment effective rate was 80. 0％. 5 patients (12. 5％) required further open surgery after SAPEN. 12 patients developed new important organ dysfunction and 6 patients eventually died. Conclusions SAPEN was an effective and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of IPN, but its technical advantages still need to be further validated in large scale studies.

Stent assisted percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy for treating infected pancreatic necrosis / 中华胰腺病杂志

Objective@#To investigate the feasibility and safety of stent-assisted percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (SAPEN) in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN).@*Methods@#The patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) who received the treatment of SAPEN for IPN were sequentially included from January 2018 to September 2018 in the Eastern Theater General Hospital of People′s Liberation Army. The demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The mortality and incidence of major organ dysfunctions were used as the primary observation endpoints.@*Results@#A total of 40 IPN patients were enrolled including 27 men and 13 women. The percutaneous covered stent placement procedures were successful in all cases; the median number of SAPEN operations was 1 (range 1-3), and no operation-related complications occurred. 32 patients were successfully cured by SAPEN, and the treatment effective rate was 80.0%. 5 patients (12.5%) required further open surgery after SAPEN. 12 patients developed new important organ dysfunction and 6 patients eventually died.@*Conclusions@#SAPEN was an effective and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of IPN, but its technical advantages still need to be further validated in large scale studies.

Interpretation of American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice update: management of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis patients / 中国实用外科杂志

American Gastroenterological Association(AGA)has published the latest clinical practice update in Gastroenterology in August 2019. The purpose of this AGA clinical practice update is to review the available evidence and expert recommendations regarding the clinical care of patients with pancreatic necrosis and to offer concise best practice advice for the optimal management of patients with this highly morbid condition. In recent decades,with the improvement in clinical practice,the management of pancreatic necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis(AP)has undergone great changes. The well-defined step-up approach has been more advocated rather than the traditional open surgery. The treatment of pancreatic necrosis mainly includes two aspects,conservative methods, which consist of antimicrobial therapy as well as nutrition support,and invasive interventions.Drainage and/or debridement of pancreatic necrosis is best indicated in patients with infected necrosis or patients with sterile pancreatic necrosis and persistent clinical symptoms,which need proactive management. A step-up approach consists of percutaneous drainage or endoscopic transmural drainage, followed by direct endoscopic/percutaneous minimally invasive necrosectomy, and then surgical debridement is reasonable. As for the comparison between percutaneous surgical or endoscopic step-up approach,no studies have shown that there are differences between the two in the main clinical outcomes,for instance,mortality. Hence,the choice of specific treatment strategy in different AP centers depends mainly on their available clinical expertise and medical resources.

A comparative study on transnasal gastroscopy and conventional gastroscopy for percutaneous endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective@#To compare the therapeutic value of transnasal gastroscopy and conventional gastroscopy for infective pancreatic necrosis(IPN) through percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy(PEN).@*Methods@#A total of 24 IPN patients who received PEN for IPN from December 2015 to March 2019 were divided into the conventional gastroscopy group (n=15) and the transnasal gastroscopy group (n=9). The clinical therapeutic indicators such as vital signs, APACHE Ⅱ score changes, operation duration, difference in preoperative and postoperative volumes of peripancreatic necrosis and other indicators were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#There was no significant difference in the variation curve fitting of APACHE Ⅱ scores between the two groups (t=0.378, P=0.710). The operation time of the transnasal gastroscopy group was significantly shorter than that of the conventional gastroscopy group (119.7±47.4 min VS 172.8±56.2 min, P=0.018). Peripancreatic necrotic volume significantly decreased after operation in the transnasal gastroscopy group (404.03±170.73 mL VS 468.9±137.37 mL, P=0.002), and in the conventional gastroscopy group (499.44±227.17 mL VS 722.50±292.96 mL, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the decrease extent in the conventional gastroscopy group and the transnasal gastroscopy group (223.06±212.92 mL VS 64.87±54.94 mL, P= 0.094).@*Conclusion@#On the condition of poor drainage of percutaneous catheter drainage, PEN can significantly reduce the range of necrotic lesions. Transnasal gastroscopy has the advantages in operation time in PEN and clearing deep abscess cavities over conventional gastroscopy.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided extraluminal drainage: Novel concepts, challenges and future directions

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided management of abdominal fluid collections adjacent to the gastroduodenal lumen is a relatively new concept attracting a lot of interest in recent years. The ability of EUS to identify and drain these collections in the same session accounts for the surge of interest in these novel techniques. On the other hand, the complexity of these interventions and associated serious complications has moderated the enthusiasm of novice endoscopists to some extent and reiterated that focused research and technical innovations are needed to make EUS-guided drainage simpler and safer. Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have emerged in the last decade in the endoscopic management of malignant luminal gastrointestinal strictures. The use of SEMS in the management of benign conditions (biliary, pancreatic, and colonic strictures) is also rapidly expanding. Recently, fully-covered (FC)-SEMS have been successfully used for drainage of peripancreatic and pericholecystic fluid collections. Here we will review the existing data and future directions in the use of FC-SEMS for such drainage procedures. We will also review the literature on novel “purpose-made” prostheses, such as the lumen-apposing metallic stents, which aim to address technical problems arising in EUS-guided drainage procedures when conventional SEMS are used. Further development of these and other similar devices may transform EUS-guided drainage procedures from an esoteric concept to “mainstream”, first-line intervention.

Endoscopic Management of Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Collections

In the past decade, there has been a progressive paradigm shift in the management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections after acute pancreatitis. Refinements in the definitions of fluid collections from the updated Atlanta classification have enabled better communication amongst physicians in an effort to formulate optimal treatments. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts has emerged as the procedure of choice over surgical cystogastrostomy. The approach provides similar success rates with low complications and better quality of life compared with surgery. However, an endoscopic “step up” approach in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis has also been advocated. Both endoscopic and percutaneous drainage routes may be used depending on the anatomical location of the collections. New-generation large diameter EUS-specific stent systems have also recently been described. The device allows precise and effective drainage of the collections and permits endoscopic necrosectomy through the stents.

Endoscopic Management of Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Collections

In the past decade, there has been a progressive paradigm shift in the management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections after acute pancreatitis. Refinements in the definitions of fluid collections from the updated Atlanta classification have enabled better communication amongst physicians in an effort to formulate optimal treatments. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts has emerged as the procedure of choice over surgical cystogastrostomy. The approach provides similar success rates with low complications and better quality of life compared with surgery. However, an endoscopic “step up” approach in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis has also been advocated. Both endoscopic and percutaneous drainage routes may be used depending on the anatomical location of the collections. New-generation large diameter EUS-specific stent systems have also recently been described. The device allows precise and effective drainage of the collections and permits endoscopic necrosectomy through the stents.

Endoscopic transmural drainage and necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis / 中国内镜杂志

Pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis (AP), with a mortality reported to be as great as 32.0%. At present, it is considered that patients with proven or suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis, invasive intervention (i.e. percutaneous catheter drainage, endoscopic transluminal drainage/ necrosectomy, minimally invasive or open necrosectomy) should be delayed where possible until at least 4 weeks after initial presentation to allow the collection to become 'walled-off'. With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic transmural (stomach or duodenum) drainage and necrosectomy has been recommended as one of the preferred methods for walled-off necrosis. This article introduces the diagnosis and evaluation of the walled-off necrosis ; the indications, operation procedures, postoperative evaluation and management of postoperative complications of endoscopic transmural drainage and necrosectomy. At last, the research progress of endoscopic drainage and debridement in recent years was introduced.

A preliminary efficacy evaluation for percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy in treating infectious pancreatic necrosis / 中华胰腺病杂志

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) in treating infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN).Methods A retrospective review of clinical data of 6 patients with IPN who received PEN in Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University from Dec 2015 to Sep 2016 was performed.Clinical parameters were recorded, including basic information, severity evaluation and therapeutic methods and times.In addition, vital sign parameters and inflammatory marks before and after PEN treatment were compared.Results There were 4 patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and 2 patients with moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) in these 6 patients with IPN.Mean APACHEⅡ score was 12 (10~15), and mean MCTSI scores was 9.3(8~10).All 6 patients received a total of 13 times PEN treatments, with a mean of 2.2(1~3) times.Each patient was treated with a mean of 2.5(1~4) drainage tubes placed in the peripancreatic abscess after PEN treatment, and the mean time for drainage was 139 d(106~183 d).Besides, the mean hospitalization time was 116 d (48~223 d).All the patients′ condition was improved significantly after PEN treatment, including reduced heart rate, body temperature and inflammatory markers, without bleeding or other serious complications.Only 1 patient had pancreatic fistula after treatment, and no patients needed open abdominal drainage surgery.Patients with higher MCTSI scores likely required more times of PEN and more drainage catheters, longer length of drainage and hospital stay.Conclusions PEN was safe and effective for treating patient with IPN, but those with higher MCTSI scores were associated with more PEN treatments, more drainage tubes, and longer time of drainage and hospitalization.

Wernicke Encephalopathy after Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis with WOPN: A Case Report / 대한췌담도학회지

Infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is dangerous complication of acute pancreatitis. Open necrosectomy and post-operative irrigation of necrotic cavity have been conventional treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis, however, recently minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic necrosectomy has been regarded as preferred treatment method for infected WOPN. Endoscopic necrosectomy provides a targeted approach with a reduction in the systemic inflammatory response and avoidance of wound complications. Non alcohol related Wernicke encephalopathy is rare disease caused by thiamine deficiency due to intravenous feeding, and presented an encephalopathy, oculomotor dysfunction, gait ataxia. We report herein a case of Wernicke encephalopathy after successful endoscopic necrosectomy for infected WOPN.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: Where Are We Now?

Endoscopic drainage for pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has been increasingly used as a minimally invasive alternative to surgical or percutaneous drainage. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) has become the standard of care and a safe procedure for nonsurgical PFC treatment. EUS-TD ensures a safe puncture, avoiding intervening blood vessels. Single or multiple plastic stents (combined with a nasocystic catheter) were used for the treatment of PFCs for EUS-TD. More recently, the use of covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMSs) has provided a safer and more efficient approach route for internal drainage. We focused our review on the best approach and stent to use in endoscopic drainage for PFCs. We reviewed studies of EUS-TD for PFCs based on the original Atlanta Classification, including case reports, case series, and previous review articles. Data on clinical outcomes and adverse events were collected retrospectively. A total of 93 patients underwent EUS-TD of pancreatic pseudocysts using CSEMSs. The treatment success and adverse event rates were 94.6% and 21.1%, respectively. The majority of complications were of mild severity and resolved with conservative therapy. A total of 56 patients underwent EUS-TD using CSEMSs for pancreatic abscesses or infected walled-off necroses. The treatment success and adverse event rates were 87.8% and 9.5%, respectively. EUS-TD can be performed safely and efficiently for PFC treatment. Larger diameter CSEMSs without additional fistula tract dilation for the passage of a standard scope are needed to access and drain for PFCs with solid debris.

Highlights of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy in International Digestive Endoscopy Network 2012: How Much Has It Advanced?

The pancreatobiliary organ is composed of one of the most complicated structures and complex physiological functions among other digestive organs in our body. This is why endoscopic procedure in pancreaticobiliary system requires rather complicated techniques. In International Digestive Endoscopy Network (IDEN) 2012, many interesting pancreatobiliay endoscopy related topics were presented. Basic procedures like endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), advanced techniques like endoscopic necrosectomy, prevention and management of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and spyglass system are reviewed in this highlight summary.

Endoscopic Necrosectomy for Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis

Approximately 20% of patients with acute pancreatitis develop pancreatic necrosis with significant mortality. Surgical debridement is the traditional management of necrotizing pancreatitis, but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic necrosectomy using repeats session of debridement and stent insertion has been more frequently used within the last decade and half. This technique continues to evolve as we attempt to optimize the post-procedural outcomes.

EUS-Guided Multitransgastric Endoscopic Necrosectomy for Infected Pancreatic Necrosis with Noncontagious Retroperitoneal and Peritoneal Extension

Endoscopic necrosectomy was introduced as a safe and effective treatment modality for infected pancreatic necrosis. Although there have been many reports of endoscopic drainage of retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosis, the optimal endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis extending to the noncontagious retroperitoneal and peritoneal spaces has yet to be established. We report herein a patient with infected pancreatic necrosis with noncontagious retroperitoneal and peritoneal extension who was treated successfully by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided multiple cystogastrostomy and endoscopic necrosectomy. EUS-guided multitransgastric necrosectomy may be technically feasible and effective for the management of infected pancreatic necrosis with noncontagious retroperitoneal and peritoneal extension that demonstrates suitable anatomy. Further studies to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique are needed before its routine clinical use can be recommended.