Factibilidad, eficacia y satisfacción lograda por la intervención transdisciplinaria de un comité de ética clínico-hospitalario. Un estudio cualicuantitativo / Feasibility, effectiveness, and satisfaction achieved by the transdisciplinary intervention of a clinical-hospital ethics committee. A qualitative and quantitative study

Introducción. Las funciones del Comité de Ética Clínica (CEC) son educativas, normativas, consultivas, mediadoras y reflexivas. Como cualquier servicio de salud, las consultas de casos a un CEC deben ser sujetas a revisión y mejora de la calidad. Los objetivos fueron evaluar la factibilidad, la efectividad y la satisfacción de las recomendaciones ético-asistenciales dadas por el CEC, y evaluar su impacto en el equipo tratante y en la familia. Población y métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, cualicuantitativo, de casos clínicos presentados en el Comité de Ética Clínica del hospital desde el 1 de enero de 2013 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2017, según datos del libro de actas, historias clínicas, registros de la Oficina de Comunicación a Distancia y entrevistas semiestructuradas al equipo de salud. Resultados. Se analizaron 108 casos (106 pacientes), 73 casos con encuesta y registros, y 35 solamente con registros. Los motivos principales más frecuentes de consulta fueron los siguientes: adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico (46/42,6 %), compromiso neurológico grave (15/13,9 %), calidad de vida del paciente (11/10,2 %), conflictos entre el paciente, la familia y el sistema de salud (7/6,5 %), y rechazo del tratamiento por la familia (6/5,6 %). Se hallaron niveles altos de satisfacción (> 95 %) y niveles moderados de factibilidad (> 74 %) y efectividad (> 85 %). Solo en 50/108 casos (46,3 %) quedó registro en la historia clínica de la consulta al CEC y el 44 % de los profesionales opinó que la consulta tuvo un impacto positivo en la familia y en el paciente. Conclusiones. Los resultados contribuyeron a descubrir oportunidades de mejora, especialmente en la documentación y en la comunicación en el proceso de consulta.

Introduction. A clinical ethics committee (CEC) has educational, regulatory, advisory, mediation, and reflexive functions. As any health care service, the consults with the CEC should be subjected to review and quality improvement. The study objectives were to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and satisfaction with the bioethical recommendations made by the CEC and assess their impact on the treating team and the patient's family. Population and methods. Descriptive, retrospective, qualitative, and quantitative study of clinical cases submitted to the hospital's CEC between January 1 st, 2013 and December 31, 2017 using data from the CEC minute book, medical records, registries from the Office for Remote Communication, and semi-structured interviews with health care team members. Results. A total of 108 cases (106 patients) were analyzed: 73 cases with survey and registries and 35 with registries only. The main most frequent reasons for consultation were adequacy of therapeutic effort (46/42.6%), severe neurological involvement (15/13.9%), patient's quality of life (11/10.2%), patient-family-health system conflict (7/6.5%), and family's refusal of treatment (6/5.6%). High levels of satisfaction (> 95%) and moderate levels of feasibility (> 74%) and effectiveness (> 85%) were observed. In only 50/108 cases (46.3%), the consultation with the CEC was registered in the medical record, 44% of health care providers stated that the consultation had a positive impact on the patient and their family. Conclusions. Results helped to establish improvement opportunities, especially in terms of documentation and communication in the consultation process.

Percepción de médicos intensivistas de adultos sobre el aporte de la consultoría ético-clínica / Opinion about clinical ethics consultation among intensivist physicians

Background: Clinical ethics consultation services and their methods vary and they are seldom evaluated. Only one formal system of individual clinical ethics consultation has been reported in Chile, with a ten-year registry. Aim: To evaluate the opinion of intensivist physicians about the contribution of clinical ethics consultation. Material and Methods: An anonymous and voluntary questionnaire consulting their opinion about clinical ethics consultations was sent to 38 intensivist physicians. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 28 professionals. Eighty four percent of respondents considered that ethics consultation contributed to improve patients' quality of care, 92% responded that this practice helps in decisions about limitation of treatments or life support, and 96% expressed that it also was a positive support for patients and their relatives. Seventy two percent of respondents considered that ethics consultations enhanced their ethical sensibility, 76% that they improved their understanding of clinical ethics topics, and 72% declared that it decreased their stress in complex decision-making. Conclusions: Clinical ethics consultation provides a positive support for improvements in clinical decision-making and in the quality of patients' care.

Ethical support to psychiatry residents: a report of a Brazilian ethics consultation group

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: It is not uncommon for medical residents to deal with critically ill patients who frequently show several ethical and human dilemmas, highlighting the need for a consultation with ethical specialists. The objective of this article is to present a description of a Brazilian Ethics Consultation group designed to attend psychiatry residents. METHODS: This article reports a case of a critically ill patient with Borderline Personality Disorder with multiple intervention failures and several ethical conflicts who was seen by a resident and supported by an ethics consultation group. RESULTS: When medical residents and medical staff face severe and unusual ethical dilemmas, they might feel unprepared and have ones' mental health impaired. Thus, this article reports a successful ethics consultation and discusses its development in other academic institutions. CONCLUSION: Medical educators and staff from academic hospitals should pay attention to the needs of the medical residents. The development and support of ethics consultation groups must be provided to fulfill the need of those residents who face serious ethical and human dilemmas.

Toma de decisiones en ética clínica y su aplicación a un caso de síndromede enclaustramiento / Decision making in clinical ethics and its application to a locked-in case

La ética clínica, como parte de la bioética, tiene como función ayudar al personal sanitario, al paciente o a la familia en la toma de de-cisiones cuando estas abordan cuestiones éticas de difícil solución. En algunos problemas, esta toma de decisiones se enfrenta no solo a posturas clínicas diversas, sino que también a apremios por parte de familiares -o del mismo equipo médico- que claman por una solución ante casos que entran en el área gris del debate ético. Nuestra respuesta frente a estos problemas ingentes es la aplicación de un método de análisis clínico, el cual, mediante una metodología propia y replicable, pueda orientar la discusión sobre principios comunes y, a la vez, poder evaluar las decisiones clínicas emanadas.Más allá de las respuestas clínicas que se puedan dar frente a casos diversos, no debemos olvidar los fundamentos que la antropología cristiana nos presenta a la hora de ver al ser humano como totalidad unificada. Este criterio debe ser la base que guíe una reflexión que no solo busque criterios de calidad, sino que además valore la inviolabilidad de la vida y con ella la dignidad de cada persona, en especial, en aquellas condiciones de fragilidad como el síndrome de enclaustramiento.

Clinical ethics (as part of bioethics) has the function of helping health personnel, the patient, or the family in decision-making when they address ethical issues that are difficult to solve. In some problems, this decision-making is not only confronted with diverse clinical positions, but also by pressure from family members or the same medical team that clamour for a solution to cases that fall into the grey area of ethical debate. Our response to these enormous problems is the application of a method of clinical analysis which, through its own replicable methodology, can guide the discussion of common principles and, at the same time, be able to evaluate the clinical decisions that have been made.Beyond the clinical responses that can be given to diverse cases, we must not forget the foundations that Christian anthropology presents us when it comes to seeing man as a unified whole, this criterion must be the basis that guides a reflection that not only look for quality criteria but value the inviolability of life and with it the dignity of each person especially in those conditions of fragility, such as locked-in.

Challenges and Opportunities in Clinical Ethics with the Implementation of Korea's End-of-Life Act / Desafíos y oportunidades en ética clínica con la implementación de la Ley de fin de vida de Corea / Desafios e oportunidades em ética clínica com a implementação do Ato de Fim-da-Vida na Córeia

Abstract: This paper examines the possible impacts of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life in Korea (Korea's end-of-life act), legislated in 2016, on the development of hospital ethics committees and clinical ethics consultation services in South Korea. Clinical ethics in Korea has not made much progress in comparison to other subdisciplines of biomedical ethics. While the enactment of this law may give rise to beneficial clinical ethics services, it is possible that customary practices and traditional authorities in Korean society will come into conflict with the norms of clinical ethics. This paper examines how the three main agents of Korean society—family, government, and medical professionals—may clash with end-of-life stage norms in clinical ethics, thus posing obstacles to the development of hospital committees and consultation services. A brief outline of what lies ahead for the progress of clinical ethics practice is explored.

Resumen: Este documento examina los posibles impactos de la Ley de decisiones sobre el tratamiento de soporte vital para pacientes en hospicios y cuidados paliativos, o al final de la vida en Corea (Ley de Corea del Final de la Vida), legislada en 2016, sobre el desarrollo de comités de ética hospitalaria y servicios de consulta de ética clínica en Corea del Sur. La ética clínica en Corea no ha avanzado mucho en comparación con otras subdisciplinas de la ética biomédica. Si bien la promulgación de esta ley puede dar lugar a servicios de ética clínica beneficiosos, es posible que las prácticas tradicionales y las autoridades tradicionales en la sociedad coreana entren en conflicto con las normas de ética clínica. Este documento examina cómo los tres agentes principales de la sociedad coreana —familia, gobierno y profesionales médicos— pueden chocar con las normas de ética clínica al final de la vida, lo que plantea obstáculos para el desarrollo de comités hospitalarios y servicios de consulta. Se explora un breve resumen de lo que queda por delante para el progreso de la práctica de la ética clínica.

Resumo: Este artigo examina os possíveis impactos que o Ato sobre Decisões Relacionadas a Tratamento de Manutenção da Vida para Pacientes em Casas de Idosos e de Cuidados Paliativos ou ao Fim da Vida na Coréia (ato de fim da vida da Coréia), aprovado pelo legislativo em 2016, sobre o desenvolvimento de comitês de ética de hospitais e serviços de consulta sobre ética clínica na Coréia do Sul. Ética clínica na Coréia não sofreu muito progresso em comparação com outras subdisciplinas da ética biomédica. Enquanto a promulgação desta lei pode dar origem a serviços de ética clínica proveitosos, é possível que práticas usuais e autoridades tradicionais na sociedade coreana entrarão em conflito com as normas da ética clínica. Este artigo examina como os três principais agentes da sociedade coreana - família, governo e profissionais médicos - podem se chocar com normas de estágios de fim da vida em ética clínica, colocando assim obstáculos para o desenvolvimento de comitês hospitalares e serviços de consulta. Um breve esboço do que vem pela frente para o progresso da prática de ética clínica é explorado.

Moderating Effect of Clinical Ethics Consultation on Doctor-patient Relationship / 中国医学伦理学

The differences of feelings and views of disease and logical thinking between doctor and patient lead to differences in values which might result in doctor-patient conflicts,and clinical ethics consultation ease the differences in values or moral conflict between doctors and patients using ethical adjustment function.Compared with the present mediation mechanism of doctor-patient relationship in China,clinical ethics consultation has the characteristics of preventing the doctor-patient conflict or dispute,multi-disciplinary experts' consultation and coping with the doctor-patient contradiction of value-laden.Although clinical ethics consultation has theoretical significance and practical value,it still faces the theoretical challenge of moral relativism,and the practical prob-lems such as competence of ethical committee,consultation effect and support system.

”FOCUS ON PRACTICE”: CLINICAL ETHICS CONSULTATION ON AN ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANT CASE / "CENTRARSE EN LA PRÁCTICA": ÉTICA CLÍNICA DE CONSULTA EN UN CASO DE TRASPLANTE HEPÁTICO ORTOTÓPICO / "CENTRALIZAR-SE NA PRÁTICA": ETICA CLÍNICA DE CONSULTA NUM CASO DE TRANSPLANTE HEPÁTICO ORTOTÓPICO

The contribution describes a case report addressed in 2011 by the clinical ethics consultation service team of the Institute of Bioethics and Medical Humanities at the "Agostino Gemelli" School of Medicine of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome (Italy). The clinical case regards ethical dilemmas about the patient's prospects for receiving an orthotopic liver transplant, because she was a non-resident and lacked a caregiver to assist her during the follow-up period, as well as a place to stay after liver transplant surgery.

El artículo presenta un caso clínico, dirigido en el año 2011 por el equipo de servicio de consulta ética clínica del Instituto de Bioética y Humanidades Médicas de la Facultad "Agostino Gemelli" de Medicina de la Universidad Católica del Sacro Cuore en Roma (Italia). El caso clínico se refiere a los dilemas éticos sobre las perspectivas del paciente para recibir un trasplante hepático ortotópico porque no era residente del país y carecía de un cuidador para asistirlo durante el periodo de seguimiento, así como de un lugar para quedarse después de la cirugía.

Este artigo apresenta um caso clínico dirigido em 2011 pela equipe de serviço de consulta ética clínica do Instituto de Bioética e Humanidades Médicas da Faculdade de Medicina Agostino Gemelli, da Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Roma, Itália). O caso clínico se refere aos dilemas éticos sobre as perspectivas da paciente para receber um transplante hepático ortotópico porque não era residente do país, carecia de um cuidador para assisti-la durante o período de observação e de um lugar para ficar depois da respectiva cirurgia.

Perfil das consultorias de bioética clínica envolvendo famílias que dificultaram a resolução de problemas / Profile of clinical bioethics consultancies involving families which hindered the resolution of problems

Este estudo avaliou 116 consultorias de bioética clínica nas quais as famílias dos pacientes dificultaram a resolução do problema ou do conflito ético. Foram observados os seguintes aspectos: solicitantes; especialidades; registros nos prontuários eletrônicos; pacientes e relações familiares. A maior parte das consultorias (71 por cento) foi gerada pelas solicitações dos médicos. Os serviços de Medicina Interna, Pediatria e Psiquiatria demandaram 56 por cento das consultorias. Foram encontrados registros de pedidos de consultoria nos prontuários de 79 por cento dos pacientes, dos quais 71 por cento foram respondidos no mesmo dia ou no seguinte. O número de consultorias por sexo do paciente foi semelhante e a idade média, de 28 anos. Em relação à procedência, 54 por cento eram de Porto Alegre. As relações familiares naturalmente impostas (71 por cento) foram mais identificadas. É importante que outros estudos sejam realizados com vistas a permitir um adequado entendimento dos problemas éticos e de suas possíveis resoluções.

This study evaluated 116 records of clinical bioethics consultation in which the patients’ family made difficultthe resolution of the problem or ethical conflict. The following aspects were evaluated: Applicants, MedicalSpecialties, Electronic Health Records, Patients and Family Relationships. Physicians requested 71% of the Bioethics consultation. The Internal Medicine, Pediatrics and Psychiatry Services demanded the majority numberof consultations (56%). The patients who had their consultations registered in electronic medical records were 79%. As for response, 71% of consultations were seen on the same day or the day after requested. Thepercentages of male and female patients were, respectively, 48% and 52% with a mean age of 28 years, 54%of the patients were from Porto Alegre. The naturally imposed family relationships (71%) were the more prevalent. It is very import that other studies be performed in order to generate adequate comprehension aboutethical problems and their possible solutions.

Qualitative Research on Clinical Ethics Consultation in Japan: The Voices of Medical Practitioners / General Medicine

<b>BACKGROUND</b> : In Japan, clinical ethics support services are only available at certain institutions. The actual conditions surrounding ethics consultation are unclear with few resources available for determining its efficacy. The object of this study is to clarify the expected outcome of ethics consultation and identify the appropriate mode. We also aim to elucidate the ideal consultant and the obstacles to achieving full utilization of ethics consultation.<br><b>METHODS</b> : Eighteen medical practitioners participated in the study. We held semi-structured interviews and analyzed these interviews by qualitative content-analysis technique.<br><b>RESULTS</b> : This study suggests that specific advice, new insights from outside parties, emotional support, and an appropriate process based on a division of labor between medicine and ethics all contribute to a team-based practice of medicine that avoids the arbitrariness and dogmatism of single practitioners. It is also indicated that timeliness and swift answers are required. Knowledge of medicine and ethics, communication skills, a close familiarity with actual conditions in medical practice, and empathy toward the medical staff were found to be as important as the qualifications of consultants. Contrarily, the participants suggested that the busy pace, lack of psychological breathing room, medical practitioners' pride, lack of awareness of ethical issues, and the negative image of the word “ethics” were significant impediments to achieving full utilization of ethics consultation.<br><b>CONCLUSIONS</b> : The present study is the first of its kind to reveal the views of medical professionals regarding clinical ethics consultation in Japan. Further research is required to identify the features of a consultation system that can be easily accessed and effectively utilized in Japan.