Subjective visual quality, reading fluency and patient satisfaction with the extended depth of focus IOL / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM: To investigate the subjective visual quality, reading fluency and patient satisfaction after a unilateral or bilateral implantation of the Tecnis Symfony extended depth of focus intraocular lens(IOL)with cataract.<p>METHODS: The retrospective analysis on the 48 patients(71 eyes)with cataract phacomulsification surgery in our hospital, which were randomly divided into two groups. The bilateral group with 23 patients(46 eyes)bilateral implanted the Symfony extended depth of focus IOL, the unilateral group with 25 patients(25 eyes)implanted the Symfony IOL in one eye and an aspherical monofocal IOL in the other eye. The uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA), uncorrected intermediate distance visual acuity(UIVA), uncorrected near distance visual acuity(UNVA), and best corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA)were measured 3, 6mo after surgery. The contrast sensitivity, reading fluency, reading speed, patient satisfaction and the occurrence of complications were also observed.<p>RESULTS: In the unilateral group, there were no significant differences in the UDVA and BCVA between an eye with the Symfony IOL and an eye with monofocal IOL 3mo after surgery(P>0.05). After 6mo of surgery, UDVA were significantly better than pre-operation in two groups, average visual acuity of LogMAR was under 0.1. There were no significant differences in UDVA, BCVA, UIVA and UNVA between two groups(P>0.05). The patients'far, intermediate, and near distances satisfaction were higher after 3mo of surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in spatial frequency contrast sensitivity between the two groups under photopic/mesopic conditions and mesopic with glare 6mo after surgery. The scores of satisfactions for reading fluency were better in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group(P>0.05). After 6mo, the reading speed of binocular group was slightly higher than the unilateral group(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between two groups(P >0.05).<p>CONCLUSION:The Symfony extended depth of focus IOL provides good far, intermediate, and near visual acuity in the bilateral group and the unilateral group, while maintaining the same level of visual quality. In both groups over 90% patients were spectacle independent. Symfony IOL has widely adaptability and highly predictability, patients can obtain better satisfactions for reading fluency and reading speed. It is more suitable for intermediate vision.

Comparison of visual quality between extended depth and trifocal intraocular lens implantation / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM: To evaluate the visual quality between the Tecnis Symfony extended depth of focus intraocular lens(IOL)and Zeiss trifocal IOL(At Lisa tri 839 MP)implantation.<p>METHODS: Forty-two patients(53 eyes)who underwent cataract phacomulsification with IOL implantation from Jan. 2019 to Dec. 2020 were randomly divided into group A and group B according to the type of implanted IOL. The group A with 22 patients(29 eyes)implanted the Tecnis Symfony extended depth of focus IOL, the group B with 20 patients(24 eyes)implanted Zeiss trifocal IOL. The uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA), uncorrected intermediate distance visual acuity(UIVA), uncorrected near distance visual acuity(UNVA), and best corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA)were measured after 3mo of surgery. The defocus curve, the quality of life and the occurrence of complications were also observed.<p>RESULTS: The visual acuity was significantly improved in both groups after 3mo of surgery. There were no significant differences in the UDVA(5m), UIVA(80cm)and BCVA(5m)between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). In group B, the UIVA(60cm)and UNVA(40cm)were better than in group A(all <i>P</i><0.05). The defocus curve analysis revealed that the group A tended to be stable between +1.0D to -2.0D, and to form a platform, while the group B had double peaks(0D, -2.5D). The distance visual acuity at 0D were no significantly differences between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05), but the near visual acuity at -2.5D and -3.5D in group B were significantly higher than in group A(all <i>P</i><0.01). In both groups over 90% patients were spectacle independent. Patients in the two groups showed different degrees of halo, glare and other optical phenomena, but the overall satisfaction were higher. The scores of satisfactions for reading speed and night vision were significantly better in group A than in group B(all <i>P</i><0.05). <p>CONCLUSION: In both groups over 90% patients were spectacle independent, they can obtain good near,intermediate and far distance visual acuity. Symfony extended depth IOL has better continuous intermediate distance visual acuity, patients can also obtain higher satisfaction and have better night vision. The Zeiss trifocal IOL implantation is associated with significantly better near visual acuity, and it is more suitable for near vision.

Measuring Defocus Curves of Monofocal, Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-focus Intraocular Lenses Using Optical Bench Test

PURPOSE: To determine the through-focus optical bench test performance of monofocal, bifocal, and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (IOLs), and to measure their defocus curves.METHODS: A model eye was placed on an optical bench to test three different IOLs (TECNIS ZXR00, ZMB00, and ZCB00; Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The focus was changed by inserting trial lenses from +1.00 diopters to −4.00 diopters, in increments of +0.25 diopters. The 1951 United States Air Force Resolution chart was used to determine the quality of the images. The degree of similarity with reference images was given by the cross-correlation coefficient, and defocus curves were drawn and compared.RESULTS: Bifocal IOLs showed lower image quality with the addition of minus diopter trial lenses, but showed good image quality at near distance. Bifocal IOLs also showed a ‘double peak’ in their defocus curve. Monofocal IOLs showed a lower image quality and cross-correlation coefficient with addition of lower-diopter trial lenses. The extended depth of focus IOLs showed a single peak in their defocus curve, but had a wider range of diopters and better image quality than monofocal IOLs.CONCLUSIONS: Bifocal IOLs showed a double peak defocus curve, and extended depth of focus IOLs showed a wider diopter range and better image quality than monofocal IOLs.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients Implanted with Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were divided into three groups, and each group included 20 patients of 40 eyes: group A with a +3.25 D bifocal IOL in both eyes, group B with an EDOF IOL in both eyes, and group C with a +3.25 D bifocal in one eye and an EDOF IOL in the other eye. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' medical charts to analyze their binocular uncorrected visual acuities (UCVAs; distant, intermediate, and near) and refraction at postoperative 3 months. RESULTS: The binocular distant UCVAs were 0.04 ± 0.01, 0.05 ± 0.02, and 0.04 ± 0.01 in groups A, B, and C, respectively, and there were no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). The intermediate UCVAs were 0.16 ± 0.01, 0.10 ± 0.01, and 0.10 ± 0.01, respectively, and group A was the lowest (A–B, p = 0.031; A–C, p = 0.018; B–C, p = 1.000). The near UCVAs were 0.05 ± 0.01, 0.24 ± 0.01, and 0.13 ± 0.01, respectively, and there were significant differences between the groups (A–B, p < 0.001, A–C: p = 0.009; B–C, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences among the three groups in binocular distant UCVA, and groups B and C showed better intermediate UCVAs than group A. Near UCVA was ranked in the order of groups A, C, B.

Extended focal length intraocular lens implantation in posttraumatic posterior capsular rupture

We present a case of posterior capsular defect with traumatic cataract after blunt trauma in which an extended focal length intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted in the bag after conventional phacoemulsification and anterior vitrectomy. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography performed preoperatively aided in the confirmation and documentation of the capsular integrity. Intraoperative trocar anterior chamber (AC) maintainer allowed AC maintenance without further complications. IOL was well centered postoperatively at 6 months, and the unaided visual acuity was 20/20 for distance and N8 for near. The report showed that an extended depth of focus IOL can be placed in eyes with ruptured posterior capsule for good visual outcome in posttraumatic young eyes and it may not be considered as a relative contraindication for it.

Visual outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the extended range of vision intraocular lens: A prospective study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the objective and subjective visual outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the extended range of vision intraocular lens (EROV IOL), the Tecnis Symfony. Methods: This was a prospective interventional case series conducted at a tertiary eye care hospital in South India. The study included patients with bilateral implantation of EROV IOLs. The uncorrected and corrected visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near vision was recorded at 6 weeks and 6 months' postoperative visit. A subjective questionnaire was administered to assess spectacle independence, photic phenomenon, and overall satisfaction. All data were recorded using Microsoft Excel worksheet. The analyses were performed using SPSS for windows software. Results: Our study included fifty patients with bilateral implantation of EROV IOLs. The mean age was 59.84 ± 11.68 years. The mean uncorrected binocular distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity (in standard decimal equivalent) was 0.89,0.99 and 0.99 respectively, at 6 months' postoperative visit. Ninety-six percent of the patients did not require spectacles for distance and 98% of the patients were free from spectacles for intermediate and near vision. 94% of our patients perceived no or minimal photic phenomena such as glare and halos. The mean subjective patient satisfaction score (out of 10) for distance, intermediate, and near was 9, 10, and 9, respectively. Conclusion: The EROV IOLs demonstrated high levels of spectacle independence for distance, intermediate, and near vision. The incidence of photic phenomena observed was minimal with a high level of patient satisfaction.