Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stem

BACKGROUND: To determine the benefit of an extensively porous coated femoral stem in patients receiving revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This study reviewed the results of 35 patients who received a revision total hip arthroplasty with extensively porous coated femoral stem between August, 1996, and December, 2002. The mean follow-up period was 77.5 months. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated by the Harris hip score and serial roentgenographic findings. RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score was 68.3 and 92.5, respectively. Radiographically, none of the acetabular components showed any evidence of migration, tilt, rotation, or shedding of metal particles. In addition, none of the femoral components showed evidence of subsidence, pedestal, or shedding of metal particles. Twenty-two hips had a mild stress shield and 2 hips had a moderate stress shield. The perioperative complications encountered were deep vein thrombosis (1 case), mild heterotopic ossification (4 cases), intraoperative periprosthetic fractures (1 case), and nonunion of the trochanteric osteotomy site (2 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Extensively porous coated femoral stems and acetabular components produce excellent clinical and radiological results in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem

Purpose: To report the outcomes of extensively porous-coated femoral stems based on diaphyseal fixation caused by extensive bone loss and osteoporosis of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: 14 cementless femoral revision procedures performed between Aug, 2000 and Apr, 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. The follow up period ranged from 24 to 53 months, with an average of 33 months. The average age at surgery was 52.3 years, there were 10 males and 4 females. The reasons for the revision surgery were aseptic loosening in 11(78.7%) hips, progressive osteolysis in 1(7.1%), septic loosening in 1(7.1%) and periprosthetic fracture in 1(7.1%). Results: The Harris hip score improved from 50.4 points preoperatively to 88.5 points postoperatively. The complications encountered were a greater trochanteric fracture in 2 hips (14.3%), periprosthetic fracture in 1(7.1%), dislocation of the hip in 2(14.3%), and minimal thigh pain in 2(14.3%). Radiographic evidence of a bone ingrown stem was found in 11 hips (78.6%), and 3 hips (21.4%) showed stable fibrous fixation. Stem subsidence > 5mm was noticed in 1 hip (7.1%) and > 10mm in 2 (14.3%) but there was no further progression after 1 year. Moderate stress-shielding was noticed in 4 hips(28.6%). To date, no significant wear or osteolysis has been observed. Conclusion: An extensively porous-coated revision stem appears to be a reasonable choice in the presence of proximal femoral bone loss as a short term follow up. However, the concerns related to the postoperative complications will require a longer term follow up.

Hip Hemiarthroplasty Using Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stem in Femoral Neck Fracture Aged 70 Years or Older / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of cementless extensively porous coated femoral stem in the patients older than 70 years, who had received a bipolar hemiarthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1996 to June 2001, this study reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 31 femoral neck fracture patients (31 hips, 9 men and 22 women), who underwent a bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a cementless extensively porous coated femoral stem, were 70 years or older and were followed up more than 2 years. The mean age at surgery was 79.3 (70-84). The mean follow up period was 31.2 months (range, 24 to 52). The clinical and radiological results were evaluated by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the serial X-ray findings, respectively. RESULTS: Clinically, the mean HHS at the last follow up was 84.1 (69-92). Radiographically, there was no evidence of subsidence, pedestal and osteolysis of the femoral stem. A radiolucent line was observed in 11 cases, but there was no evidence of progression. Therefore, all femoral stems were confirmed to be stable. Stress shielding was observed in 22 cases, mild in 20 cases and moderate in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a cementless extensively porous coated femoral stem inpatients 70 years or older showed good clinical and radiological results. Therefore it is a useful prosthesis for bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients 70 years or older.