Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics ; : 207-216, 2006.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-169862

RESUMEN

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: To conduct a successful function of implant prosthesis in oral cavity for a long time, it is important that not only structure materials must have the biocompatibility, but also the prosthesis must be designed for the stress, which is occurred in occlusion, to scatter adequately within the limitation of alveolar bone around implant and bio-capacity of load support. Now implant which is used in clinical part has a very various shapes, recently, the fixture that has tapered form of internal connection is often selected. However, the stress analysis of fixtures still requires more studies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to stress analysis of the implant prosthesis according to the different implant systems using finite element method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study we make the finite element models that three type implant fixture; Branemark, Camlog, Frialit-2 were placed in the area of mandibular first premolar and prosthesis fabricated, which we compared with stress distribution using the finite element analysis under two loading condition. CONCLUSION: The conclusions were as follows: 1. In all implant system, oblique loading of maximum Von mises stress of implant, alveolar bone and crown is higher than vertical loading of those. 2. Regardless of loading conditions and the type of system, cortical bone which contacts with implant fixture top area has high stress, and cancellous bone has a little stress. 3. Under the vertical loading, maximum Von mises stress of Branemark system with external connection type and tapered form is lower than Camlog and Frialit-2 system with internal connection type and tapered form, but under oblique loading Camlog and Frialit-2 system is lower than Branemark system.


Asunto(s)
Diente Premolar , Coronas , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Boca , Prótesis e Implantes
2.
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics ; : 584-593, 2006.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-225134

RESUMEN

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dental implant which has been developed gradually through many experiments and clinical applications is presently used to various dental prosthetic treatments. To conduct a successful function of implant prosthesis in oral cavity for a long time, it is important that not only structure materials must have the biocompatibility, but also the prosthesis must be designed for the stress, which is occurred in occlusion, to scatter adequately of load support. Therefore, it is essential to give the consideration about the stress analysis of supporting tissues for higher successful rates. PURPOSE: Recently, many implant manufacturing company produce various taper design of root form implant, the fixture is often selected. However, the stress analysis of taper form fixture still requires more studies. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study we make the element models that five implant fixture; Branemark system(Nobel Biocare, Gothenberg, Sweden), Camlog system(Altatec, Germany), Astra system(Astra Tech, Sweden), 3i system(Implant Innovations Inc, USA), Avana system(Osstem, Korea)were placed in the area of mandibular first premolar and prosthesis fabricated, which we compared with stress distribution using the three-dimension finite element analysis under two loading condition. RESULTS: This study compares the aspect of stress distribution of each system with the standard of Von mises stress, among many resulted from finite element analysis so that this research gets the following results. 1. In all implant system, oblique loading of maximum Von mises stress of implant, alveolar bone and crown is higher than vertical loading of those. 2. Regardless of loading conditions and type of system, cortical bone which contacts with implant fixture top area has high stress, and cancellous bone has a little stress. under the vertical loading, maximum Von mises stress is more higher in order of Branemark, Camlog, Astra, 3i, Avana. under the horizontal loading, maximum Von mises is more higher in order of Camlog, Branemark, Astra, 3i, Avana.


Asunto(s)
Diente Premolar , Coronas , Implantes Dentales , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Boca , Prótesis e Implantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA