Continuous Monitoring of Donor Specific Anti-HLA Antibody in Kidney Transplantation Patients / 대한이식학회지

BACKGROUND: A positive reaction at flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) has been highlighted by its predictive value for clinical outcome in kidney transplantation after accumulation of large clinical data. The detection of de novo development of anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation is associated with increased rejection and decreased graft survival. In this study, we report the experience for the detection of anti-donor specific antibody (DSA) by more sensitive FCXM methods in renal transplantation patients. METHODS: T and B cell FCXMs were performed on 11 pretransplant and 51 posttransplant sera from 11 patients who received renal grafts between 2004 and 2005. The posttransplant sera were collected in specific and regular intervals from posttranspant 1 week to 1 year. RESULTS: Among 62 sera, four (7.8%) from 2 patients showed positive FCXM. In one patient, pretransplant serum which was negative at previous CDCXM, and 2 consecutive sera collected at 1 week and 1 month after transplantation were positive at FCXM. And the antibody identified was B51 which was specific for one of donor alleles (DSA). In another patient, FCXM became positive 1 week after transplantation although pretransplant serum had negative results at both CDCXM and FCXM. Both patients had experienced more than one rejection episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of DSA with more sensitive technique such as flow cytometry based method clearly displayed a beneficial effect for prediction of clinical outcome as a part of pretransplant compatibility test, and also as a posttransplant monitoring test to identify the de novo production of clinically significant DSA.

Comparison of Flow Cytometry Crossmatch with Conventional Lymphocytotoxic Crossmatch in Living Donor Renal Transplantation / 대한신장학회잡지

This study was performed to compare the sensitivity of flow cytometry crossmatch(FCXM) with conventional lymphocytotoxic crossmatch(CXM), and its clinical impact. Total 174 pair of sera from potential living renal transplant donors and recipients were tested from Jan. 5, 1995 to April 3, 1996 with conventional CXM and FCXM at Kangnam St. Mary's hospital. Of 174 potential living donor/ recipient pairs, two (1.1%) had positive warm T (TW)/CXM, 3(1.7%) positive warm B(BW)/CXM, and 5(2.9%) positive warm TandB/CXM. Of 164 potential CXM-negative living donor/recipient pairs evaluated with FCXM, ten (6%) had positive T/ FCXM, and thirty one (19%) positive B/FCXM. Of 45 living donor renal transplantation with negative TW/CXM, one (2.2%) had a positive BW/CXM, 11 (24.4%) positive B/FCXM, and 2 (4.4%) positive T/ FCXM. They had been followed up over 3 months. Acute rejection episodes were observed in 8 patients. Of these patients, two had positive B/FCXM and one had a positive T/FCXM. In conclusion, FCXM is more sensitive than conventional CXM. Further follow-up study is necessary to know whether this higher sensitivity leads to fewer graft rejection.