RESUMEN
Objective:To identify 3 the disease-causing genes and mutations of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), and to study the correlation of phenotype and genotype.Methods:A retrospective study. Four LCA patients and seven family members who were diagnosed by eye examination in Ning Xia Eye Hospital of People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from January to December 2021 were included in the study. Four patients were from 3 unrelated families. Detailed collection of medical history and family history were received. Related ophthalmologic examination were collected and genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. Whole-exome sequencing method was used for genetic diagnosis. The identified variant was confirmed with Sanger sequencing. Potential pathogenic mutation was analyzed using software and conserved domain analysis and performed co-separated analysis between the family member and the proband.Results:Of the 4 patients, 1 patient was males and 3 patients were females; the age was from 4 to 18 years. Nystagmus were seen in 3 cases, finger pressing eyes and night blindness was seen in 1 cases; electroretinogram showed 4 cases of extinction or near extinction. The foveal reflection was visible in all eyes, and there was no obvious abnormality in the peripheral retina. One eye had strong reflection signal with raised ellipsoid in macular area; two eyes had weak reflection signal faintly visible between retinal layers; 1 eye had increased blood vessel branches, peripheral retinal non-perfusion area with capillary leakage; annular strong autofluorescence in macular area 4 eyes. No obvious abnormality was found in the phenotypes of family members. Genetic testing showed that the proband of pedigree 1 (Ⅱ-1) was found a homozygous missense mutation in c.640A>T (p.C214S) (M1) of PRPH2 gene. The proband of pedigree 2 (Ⅱ-2) was found compound heterozygous mutation in c.1256G>A(p.R419Q) (M2) and c.1A>C (p.M1L) (M3) of TULP1 gene. The proband 3 (Ⅱ-1) and her sister (Ⅱ-2) were both found compound heterozygous mutation in c.1943T>C (p.L648P) (M4) and c.380C>T (p.P127L) (M5) of GUCY2D gene. The parents and sister (Ⅱ-1) of the proband in family 2 and the parents of the proband in family 3 were all carriers of the corresponding heterozygous variant. M1, M3, M4, M5 were novel mutations and unreported. The genotype and disease phenotype were co-segregated within the family. According to the analysis of pedigree and genetic testing results, all 3 families were autosomal recessive inheritance. The amino acid conservation analysis found that M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 were highly conserved among species. The results of bioinformatics analysis were all pathogenic variants. Conclusions:PRPH2 gene M1, TULP1 gene M3, and GUCY2D gene M4, M5 were novel mutations and not been reported in the literature and database. This research expanded the gene mutation spectrum of LCA. The patients with LCA have available characterristics, including onset age, varying ocular fundus and severe visual impairment.
RESUMEN
Objective:To observe clinical phenotypes and analyze the pathogenic genes of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA).Methods:A retrospective clinical study. From 2019 to 2020, 2 patients diagnosed with LCA by genetic testing in Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital and their 6 unaffected family members were enrolled in the study. Two patients were from 2 unrelated families, both were probands. The patient's medical history was inquired in detail, slit lamp microscopy, ultra-widefield fundus photography, autofluorescence, and flash visual evoked potential (F-VEP) were performed. Peripheral vein blood (3-5 ml) was collected and genomic DNA was extracted from all study subjects. A total of 381 pathogetic genes associated with inherited retinal diseases, were selected by targeted exome sequencing capture strategy. Sanger sequencing was used to verify suspected pathogenic mutations. Candidate pathogenic mutations were identified after bioinformatics analysis. Sanger sequencing, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and family co-identification were used to confirm the final mutations.Results:Two patients were male, aged 3 and 27 years. One case had vision loss in both eyes, accompanied by nystagmus and acupressure eye sign since childhood. The clinical hallmark of the proband (F1-Ⅱ-3) in F1 includes clearly boundary of optic disc, normal retinal blood vessels and macular fovea. The implied period of the maximum forward wave in both eyes of F-VEP was roughly normal, and its amplitude decreased significantly. The phenotype of the proband (F2-Ⅱ-1) in F2 includes optic nerve head pallor, bone-spicule intraretinal pigmentation, "gold-foil maculopathy" , retina patchy hypo-autofluorescence in both eyes. There was no abnormal phenotype in the eyes of the family members. According to the genetic diagnosis, the proband (F1-Ⅱ-3) carried the GUCY2D gene c.835G>A (p.D279N) (M1) and exon 9-19 deletion (M2) compound heterozygous mutations, in which M1 was derived from healthy mother and M2 was derived from healthy father. The proband (F2-Ⅱ-1) carried CRB1 gene c.1576C>T(R526X) (M3) and c.1522T>C (C508R) (M4) compound heterozygous mutations, in which M3 from the healthy father, M4 from the healthy mother. M2 and M4 were novel mutations. Conclusion:GUCY2D gene mutations lead to LCA1 type in the F1 family, CRB1 gene mutations lead to LCA8 type in the F2 family; there are significant different phenotypes caused by different pathogenic genes.