The value of gadoxetate disodium enhanced MRI in the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis / 中华放射学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the value of quantitative analysis of the relative signal intensity (SI) of liver gadolinium disodium enhanced MRI in the grading of liver fibrosis.Methods:From January 2018 to October 2020, the relevant data of 131 patients who underwent gadoxetate disodium enhanced MRI examination were retrospectively analyzed in Henan Provincial People′s Hospital. All patients had histopathological results. According to the Laennec grading system of liver fibrosis, the patients were classified in F0-F1 (27 cases), F2 (19 cases), F3 (17 cases) and F4 (68 cases). The signal intensity of the liver, erector spinae and spleen were measured before and after the enhancement; and 5 post-contrast relative SI parameters were calculated, including the relative enhancement (RE), liver-to-muscle contrast ratio (LMC), liver-to-spleen contrast ratio (LSC), LMC increase rate, LSC increase rate. The differences of 5 post-contrast relative SI parameters among the different fibrosis grades were compared using one-way analysis of variance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of 5 post-contrast relative SI parameters in the diagnosis of clinically significant liver fibrosis (F2-F4), advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) and liver cirrhosis (F4).Results:The differences of RE, LMC, LSC, LMC increase rate, LSC increase rate among different liver fibrosis grades were statistically significant (all P<0.001). With the increasing of the degree of liver fibrosis, the RE, LMC increase rate and LSC increase rate showed decreased. ROC results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of RE, LMC increase rate, LSC increase rate in diagnosing liver fibrosis in all levels were greater than those of LMC and LSC. The AUC values of RE, LMC increase rate, LSC increase rate in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2-F4) were 0.89, 0.86, 0.83, with the sensitivity as 81.7%, 71.2%, 81.7%, and the specificity as 96.3%, 85.2%, and 74.1%, respectively. The AUC values of RE, LMC increase rate, LSC increase rate in the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) were 0.93, 0.88, 0.86, with the sensitivity as 84.7%, 72.9%, 91.8%, and the specificity as 91.3%, 87.0 %, 71.7%; and the AUC values for diagnosing liver cirrhosis (F4) were 0.92, 0.86, 0.85, with the sensitivity as 82.4%, 76.5%, 92.7%, and the specificity as 88.9%, 81.0%, 65.1%, respectively. Conclusion:Gadoxetate disodium enhanced MRI relative SI parameters including RE, LMC increase rate and LSC increase rate might be used as a useful imaging marker in liver fibrosis grading.

Noninvasive Assessment of Advanced Fibrosis Based on Hepatic Volume in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Noninvasive liver fibrosis evaluation was performed in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We used a quantitative method based on the hepatic volume acquired from gadoxetate disodium-enhanced (Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. METHODS: A total of 130 patients who were diagnosed with NAFLD and underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. Histological data were available for 118 patients. Hepatic volumetric parameters, including the left hepatic lobe to right hepatic lobe volume ratio (L/R ratio), were measured. The usefulness of the L/R ratio for diagnosing fibrosis ≥F3–4 and F4 was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify variables (age, body mass index, serum fibrosis markers, and histological features) that were associated with the L/R ratio. RESULTS: The L/R ratio demonstrated good performance in differentiating advanced fibrosis (AUROC, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.88) from cirrhosis (AUROC, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.99). Multiple regression analysis showed that only fibrosis was significantly associated with the L/R ratio (coefficient, 0.121; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The L/R ratio, which is not influenced by pathological parameters other than fibrosis, is useful for diagnosing cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD.

Troubleshooting Arterial-Phase MR Images of Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Liver

Gadoxetate disodium is a widely used magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent for liver MR imaging, and it provides both dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. However, acquiring optimal arterial phase images at liver MR using gadoxetate disodium is more challenging than using conventional extracellular MR contrast agent because of the small volume administered, the gadolinium content of the agent, and the common occurrence of transient severe motion. In this article, we identify the challenges in obtaining high-quality arterial-phase images of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MR imaging and present strategies for optimizing arterial-phase imaging based on the thorough review of recent research in this field.

Hemangioma Diagnosed by Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI in a Patient with Chronic Hepatitis C

A hemangioma is the most common benign hepatic tumor. Many hepatic hemangioma tend to be found incidentally, but should be differentiated from malignant tumors, especially in patients with a high risk for malignancy. We presented a 52-year-old woman who diagnosed as hepatic hemangioma. The patient was a chronic alcohol abuser and diagnosed as a hepatic C virus carrier for the first time. Contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 4cm sized hepatic mass involving both segment 5 and 6. Abdominal CT finding suggested hepatic hemangioma, but could not rule out the malignancy. Because the patient had risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma, abdominal ultrasonography (US) was performed for further evaluation. But abdominal US also showed atypical finding. For the confirmative diagnosis, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using gadoxetate disodium (primovist(R), Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany) which is the innovative liver cell-specific contrast medium was done, and the patient was diagnosed as hepatic hemangioma.

Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations

PURPOSE: To investigate whether histogram analysis of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate enhanced-MRI could be used as a quantitative index for determination of liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients [26 in a normal liver function (NLF) group and 37 in a cirrhotic group] underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, and hepatobiliary phase images were obtained at 20 minutes after contrast injection. The signal intensity of the hepatic parenchyma was measured at four different regions of interest (ROI) of the liver, avoiding vessels and bile ducts. Standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and corrected CV were calculated on the histograms at the ROIs. The distributions of CVs calculated from the ROI histogram were examined and statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The CV value was 0.041+/-0.009 (mean CV+/-SD) in the NLF group, while that of cirrhotic group was 0.071+/-0.020. There were statistically significant differences in the CVs and corrected CV values between the NLF and cirrhotic groups (p<0.001). The most accurate cut-off value among CVs for distinguishing normal from cirrhotic group was 0.052 (sensitivity 83.8% and specificity 88.5%). There was no statistically significant differences in SD between NLF and cirrhotic groups (p=0.307). CONCLUSION: The CV of histograms of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may be useful as a quantitative value for determining the presence of liver cirrhosis.