Inestabilidad anterior de hombro con lesión de Hill-Sachs on-track. ¿Bankart o Bankart-remplissage? / Anterior shoulder instability with Hill-Sachs on-track. Bankart or Bankart-remplissage?

Resumen: Introducción: en pacientes con inestabilidad glenohumeral (GH) anterior con defecto de Hill-Sachs (HS) off-track o enganchante, Bankart-remplissage (B + R) reduce tasa de recurrencia en comparación a Bankart aislado (B). Hay controversia si tasa de recurrencia también disminuye en pacientes con defecto de HS on-track o no enganchantes. Objetivo: comparar la tasa de recurrencia y evolución clínica entre la cirugía de B versus B-R en pacientes operados por inestabilidad glenohumeral anterior con defecto de Hill-Sachs on-track. Material y métodos: estudio de cohorte, no randomizado, retrospectivo y unicéntrico, en pacientes operados por inestabilidad glenohumeral anterior, entre Enero 2010 y Diciembre de 2018. Se incluyen sólo pacientes con defecto de Hill-Sachs on-track. Fueron comparados pacientes operados con cirugía de B versus B + R. Se consigna recurrencia, complicación, reoperación y sensación de inestabilidad. Además, se realizan y comparan puntajes de EVA, SSV, WOSI y qDASH. Resultados: de los 105 pacientes que cumplieron criterios de inclusión, 78 (74.3%) realizaron seguimiento completo (52 B y 26 B + R, 4.3 años mediana de seguimiento). Hubo mayor tasa de recurrencia en grupo B en comparación a B + R, siendo esta diferencia no significativa (17.3% versus 7.7%, p = 0.21). No hubo diferencia significativa en dolor residual, sensación de inestabilidad residual, complicaciones o puntajes de escala EVA, qDASH, SSV ni WOSI. En análisis por subgrupo, pacientes con deportes de contacto, B tienen mayor tasa de recurrencia (24.1% versus 0%, p = 0.08) y complicaciones comparadas con B + R (41.4% versus 18.2%, p = 0.16), siendo estas diferencias no significativas. Conclusión: no hubo diferencias significativas en tasa de recurrencia y evolución funcional entre cirugía de Bankart aislado o Bankart-remplissage para inestabilidad glenohumeral anterior asociada a defecto de Hill-Sachs on-track. Estudios comparativos, prospectivos deben realizarse para establecer recomendaciones definitivas.

Abstract: Introduction: in patients with anterior glenohumeral (GH) instability together with an off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs (HS) defect, Bankart-remplissage (B-R) surgery reduces the recurrence rate when compared to Bankart (B) surgery alone. There is controversy regarding whether the recurrence rate also decreases in patients with on-track or non-engaging Hill-Sachs defects. Objective: to compare the recurrence rate and clinical evolution of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with 'on-track' Hill-Sachs defect treated with either B or B-R surgery. Material and methods: non-randomized, retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability and on-track Hill-Sachs defect, operated between January 2010 and December 2018. Patients operated with B versus B-R were compared. Recurrence, complications and re-operation were recorded. In addition, VAS, SSV, WOSI and qDASH scores were obtained and compared in both groups. Results: of the 105 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 78 (74.3%) patients had a complete follow-up (52 B and 26 B-R, 4.3 years median follow-up). There was a higher recurrence rate in group B compared to B-R, with this difference not reaching statistical significance (17.3% vs 7.7%, p = 0.21). There were no significant differences in residual pain, feeling of instability, complications or VAS, qDASH, SSV or WOSI scores between both groups. In the subgroup analysis, patients who practiced contact sports and were operated with B showed higher recurrence rates (24.1% vs 0%, p = 0.08) and complications (41.4% vs 18.2%, p = 0.16) when compared to B + R, although these differences were not significant. Conclusion: there were no significant differences in recurrence rates and functional evolution between patients with anterior glenohumeral instability operated with B or B-R surgery. Comparative, prospective studies should be performed to establish definitive recommendations.

Reliability of three dimensional CT measurement of glenoid track in patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the reliability and repeatability of three-dimensional (3D)-CT measurement of glenoid track.@*METHODS@#Glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone defects in 60 patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of the unilateral shoulder were evaluated by 3D-CT and analyzed by three independent observers(shoulder orthopedists) according to the Di Giacomo method. These injuries were classified to formulate a surgical protocol. All the patients were repeatedly measured 1 week later. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (COV) were used for reliability analysis.@*RESULTS@#Interobserver reliability was "very good" for both measurements of glenoid diameter and glenoid bone defects, and "good" for measurements of Hill-Sachs interval. Interobserver agreement was high on the assessment of the extent of the glenoid defect, and poor on track/off track assessment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Intraobserver reliability for measurements of glenoid diameter, glenoid defect, and Hill-Sachs interval was "very good". The COV was 4.1% for glenoid diameter, 4.4% for glenoid defect, and 21.1% for Hill-Sachs interval.@*CONCLUSION@#The reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CT measurements of glenoid bone defects are good, but the assessment of humeral head bone defects shows large variability with poor reliability.

Glenoid track «off-track¼ as a risk factor for recurrence of anterior glenohumeral instability in postoperative patients / El encarrilamiento glenoideo off-track como factor de riesgo de recidiva de inestabilidad glenohumeral en pacientes postoperados

Abstract: Introduction: Glenoid track is used to assess the engagement of Hill-Sachs lesions. The objective of this study was to identify if off-track glenoid track was a risk factor for recurrence of anterior glenohumeral instability in postoperative patients with arthroscopic anterior labrum repair. Material and methods: Sixty patients with glenohumeral instability who underwent arthroscopic repair of the anterior labrum were studied. Study group (patients with recurrence of postoperative dislocation) and control (no dislocation). Radiographic measurements were made on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Measurements of glenoid diameter, glenoid bone loss, as well as the presence and size of Hill-Sachs lesions were obtained. Later they were classified as «on-track¼ or «off-track¼. Results: Seven (11.67%) patients suffered recurrence, of which six (10%) were carriers of an off-track injury and 1 (1.67%) on-Track. 53 (88.33%) patients did not experience recurrence, of which 11 (18.33%) were carriers of an off-track injury and 42 (70%) on track. A 23.47 increased risk of recurrence of instability was interpreted in patients with «off-track¼ lesions compared to patients with «On track¼ lesions. Conclusions: Off-track injuries were a risk factor for recurrence of instability in patients who underwent Bankart-type arthroscopic repair. This allows us to recommend that the presence of lesions be routinely studied and classified as «on-track¼ or «off-track¼ to provide a better therapeutic approach.

Resumen: Introducción: El encarrilamiento glenoideo se emplea para valorar el enganche de lesiones Hill-Sachs. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar si el encarrilamiento glenoideo off-track fue un factor de riesgo de recidiva de inestabilidad glenohumeral anterior en pacientes postoperados de reparación de labrum anterior por vía artroscópica. Material y métodos: Se estudiaron 60 pacientes sometidos a reparación artroscópica del labrum anterior. Grupo de estudio (pacientes con recidiva de luxación postoperatoria) y control (sin luxación). Las mediciones radiográficas se realizaron en resonancia magnética y en tomografía axial computarizada. Se obtuvieron mediciones del diámetro glenoideo, pérdida ósea glenoidea así como la presencia y tamaño de lesiones de Hill-Sachs. Posteriormente se clasificaron como on-track u off-track. Resultados: Siete (11.67%) pacientes sufrieron recidiva, de los cuales seis (10%) eran portadores de lesión off-track y uno (1.67%) on-track. 53 (88.33%) pacientes sin recidiva, de los cuales 11 (18.33%) eran portadores de lesión off-track y 42 (70%) on-track. Se interpretó un aumento de riesgo de recidiva de inestabilidad de 23.47 en los pacientes portadores de lesión de tipo off-track en comparación con los pacientes portadores de lesiones on-track. Conclusiones: Las lesiones off-track fueron un factor de riesgo de recidiva de inestabilidad en los pacientes a quienes se realizó reparación artroscópica tipo Bankart, lo cual nos permite recomendar que de forma rutinaria se estudie la presencia de lesiones y clasificarlas como on-track u off-track para brindar un mejor abordaje terapéutico.