Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of the Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons ; : 154-161, 2010.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-784963

RESUMEN

0.05). 2. At the total success rate, osteotome group was 92.4% and Hatch reamer group was 94.9%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). 3. On the discomfort during the operation by using numerical rating scale, osteotome group was 2.87 +/- 0.83 and Hatch reamer group was 1.12 +/- 0.64. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The Hatch reamer group' clinical results was similar to osteotome group and we thought that Hatch reamer technique can overcome the faults of osteotome technique.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar , Mareo , Pisos y Cubiertas de Piso , Maxilar , Trasplantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA