Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2023 Mar; 71(3): 743-749
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224889

RESUMEN

Purpose: To assess the quantum of cataract surgical training opportunities for trainees enrolled in ophthalmology residency programs in India. Methods: An anonymous online survey was sent across to resident ophthalmologists across India through various social media platforms. The results were tabulated and analyzed. Results: A total of 740 resident ophthalmologists participated in the survey. In all, 40.1% (297/740) were independently performing cataract surgeries. Of those who were not performing independent cataract surgeries, 62.5% (277/443) were in the third year of residency. A significantly higher proportion of trainees who were not operating independent cataract surgeries were enrolled in MD/MS programs as compared with DNB courses (65.6% vs. 43.7%; P < 0.0001). Of those who were operating independent cases; 97.1% had exposure to manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS), whereas only 14.1% performed phacoemulsification. It was noted that 31.3% of residents reported that on an average a trainee in their training program performed less than 100 independent cataract surgeries throughout the residency. Apart from cataract surgery, the most performed surgeries by residents were pterygium excision (85.3%), followed by enucleation/ evisceration (68.1%). When it came to training aids, 47.2% (349/740) of the respondents reported no access to wet lab, animal/cadaver eyes, or surgical simulators for training. Conclusion: The amount of surgical exposure in terms of cataract surgery across residency programs in India is low with most of the ophthalmology residents who participated in this survey not operating cataracts independently; even in their final year of residency. Exposure to phacoemulsification in residency programs is very limited across the country. Although some programs do provide well?rounded surgical exposure to trainees, such centers are scarce; the stark variations in infrastructure, training opportunities, and surgical numbers warrant an overhaul in the structure and curriculum of residency programs in India

2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2022 Nov; 70(11): 4018-4025
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224693

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trainee performance across six modules of a virtual reality (VR) simulator. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 10 manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) trainees who practiced cataract surgery on an MSICS VR simulator for one month. They were assessed in six major steps which included scleral groove, tunnel dissection, keratome entry, capsulorhexis, nucleus delivery, and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion under a trainer抯 supervision. The information included in their score metrics was collected, and their overall performance was evaluated. Results: Thirty attempts were evaluated for scleral groove, tunnel dissection, and capsulorhexis and 15 attempts for keratome entry. Candidates had varied results in the dimensional aspects and their rates of complications with a mean satisfactory score of 3.1 � 4.17, 6.8 � 5.75, 5.8 � 7.74, and 1.8 � 2.57, respectively. Nucleus delivery (n = 5) had more of iris pull and IOL insertion (n = 5) had more of lost IOL as complications but both had a higher satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: A VR simulator is a useful tool for training surgeons before their entry into live surgery. It is an effective method for evaluating objectively the structural characteristics of each phase in MSICS and their associated complications, helping them anticipate it earlier during live surgery by giving them a near real world experience.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA