RESUMEN
Objective:To analyze the effect of elevated pulmonary artery pressure measured by echocardiography on clinical characteristics and adverse events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.Methods:Retrospective analysis hospitalized patients with acute pulmonary embolism diagnosed in Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 were divided into elevated pulmonary artery pressure group and control group according to pulmonary artery pressure measured by echocardiography. The differences between the two groups in admission baseline data, admission basic situation, admission hematology examination, admission imaging examination, in-hospital medication and in-hospital adverse events were compared.Results:A total of 568 patients with acute pulmonary embolism were included, including 178 in the elevated pulmonary artery pressure group and 390 in the control group. The data analysis of the two groups showed that the proportion of height, weight, body mass index, smoking history, coronary heart disease history, stroke history, diabetes history, chronic heart failure history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease history and chronic renal insufficiency history in the group with elevated pulmonary artery pressure was significantly higher than that in the control group. The proportion of fracture in the group with elevated pulmonary artery pressure was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the proportion of tumor and heart rate were significantly higher than those in the control group. The hemoglobin, international standardized ratio, D-dimer, PaO 2, SaO 2, etc. of patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure were significantly lower than those of the control group, and TnI, B-type natriuretic peptide, etc. were significantly higher than those of the control group. The left ventricular ejection fraction of patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure was significantly lower than those of the control group, and the left ventricular end diastolic diameter, the proportion of mitral regurgitation, the proportion of tricuspid regurgitation, and the proportion of pulmonary artery embolism were significantly higher than those of the control group. The use proportion of rivaroxaban in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the use proportion of aspirin and warfarin was significantly higher than that in the control group. The incidence of all-cause death, acute heart failure and in-hospital hemorrhage in the group with elevated pulmonary artery pressure was significantly higher than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in other indexes between the two groups. Conclusions:There are some differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis between patients with acute pulmonary embolism complicated with elevated pulmonary artery pressure and patients with normal pulmonary artery pressure. The increase of pulmonary artery pressure may increase the risk of all-cause death, acute heart failure and nosocomial bleeding to a certain extent.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the predictive value of serum D-dimer combined with myocardial injury markers on admission for early identification of high-risk patients with acute myocarditis.Methods:Patients hospitalized for acute myocarditis in China-Japan Friendship Hospital were retrospectively enrolled from 2010 to 2021. Patients were divided into the high D-dimer level group and low D-dimer level group according to the median value of D-dimer measured by immunoturbidimetry within 24 h of admission. In-hospital adverse events were defined as death, cardiogenic shock, malignant ventricular arrhythmia and new-onset heart failure. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to explore the independent predictors of in-hospital adverse events, and receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive value.Results:A total of 106 patients were analyzed, including 52 high level D-dimer patients and 54 low level D-dimer patients, with an average age of (36±16) years, and 62.3% were male. Compared with the low D-dimer level group, patients in the high D-dimer level group had lower mean systolic blood pressure [(114±21) mmHg vs. (121±14) mmHg] and diastolic blood pressure [(71±13) mmHg vs. (76±10) mmHg], higher heart rate [(97±26) beats/min vs. (79±15) beats/min], higher C-reactive protein levels [6.82 (1.61, 20.05) mg/dL vs. 1.30 (0.13, 8.93) mg/dL] and creatinine levels [86.95 (67.63, 117.83) μmol/L vs. 68.80 (60.18, 81.93) μmol/L] on admission. The proportion of patients having QRS interval >120 ms on electrocardiogram was higher in high D-dimer level group (25.0% vs. 7.4%). There was no significant difference in patients with positive myocardial injury biomarkers between the two groups. The incidence of in-hospital adverse events was higher in the high D-dimer level group (67.3% vs. 22.2%, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that serum D-dimer levels and elevated myocardial injury markers on admission were independently associated with in-hospital adverse events. The area under the curve (AUC) of elevated serum D-dimer level on admission for predicting in-hospital adverse events was 0.781 (95% CI: 0.690-0.873), the sensitivity was 74.5%, and the specificity was 71.2%. When combined with positive cardiac biomarkers, the AUC was 0.831 (95% CI: 0.752-0.910) with a sensitivity of 80.9% and a specificity of 78.0%. Conclusions:Elevated D-dimer level on admission can predict the risk of in-hospital adverse events in patients with acute myocarditis. The combination of cardiac injury biomarkers can improve the predictive value.