Evaluation of the human-baited double net trap and BG trap as an alternative to human landing catches for collecting outdoor Aedes albopictus in China

Objective: Monitoring the density of Aedes(Ae.) albopictus was very important in evaluating the efficiency of vector management, especially when Aedes-borne diseases break, like Dengue fever, Chikungunya fever and Zika. Human landing catch (HLC) is regarded as the “gold standard” for Aedes monitoring, but it is unsafe and unethical since it potentially expose field professionals to a series of pathogens. In this study, we compared HLC with human-baited double net (HDN) and BG trap for field Aedes albopictus monitoring.The study aims to find an effective and safe alternative method to HLC in monitoring Ae. albopictus, especially in emergency monitoring. Methods: Latin square design was used, and three sites in Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province, China, were chosen to conduct outdoor HLC, HDN and BG trap catches in June. The tests were performed at three periods: a morning period (8:30-10:00), an afternoon period (15:00-16:30), and an evening period (16:30-18:00). Then a table with 81 elements was made to compare the efficiency of these three methods. Results: A total of 80, 138 and 78 adult Ae. albopitus was captured by HDN, BG trap and HLC, respectively. Among these three catches, BG trap showed the best efficacy in captured Ae. albopitus adults. The mosquitoes caught by HLC and BG trap were nearly the same at all three time series, but the density of mosquitoes caught by HDN at 16:30-18:00 was 2 times the density at 8:30-10:00 (4.44 vs 2.22 per hour). In this study, significant positive correlation between HLC and BG trap of Aedes albopitus female density was found (r=0.921, P<0.001). However, no statistical significant correlation between HLC and HDN, BG trap and HDN of Ae. albopitus female density was found (r=-0.46, P=0.820; r=0.019, P=0.923, respectively). Besides, the human-bait attraction bias of HLC catches might be more apparent than BG trap and HDN catches. Conclusions: According to our study, with high efficiency, less human-bait attraction bias, and significantly positive correlation with HLC in catching Ae. albopitus females, BG trap could be a sensitive and safer alternative to HLC for outdoor Ae. albopitus monitoring. It also showed strong potential in emergency monitoring when Aedesborne diseases break.

Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil / Comparação de métodos de captura para o diagnóstico da população de anofelinos adultos do Estado de Mato Grosso

INTRODUCTION: The present study compares human landing catches of primary malaria vectors with two alternative methods of capture: the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet. METHODS: This study used regression models to adjust capture data to a negative binominal distribution. RESULTS: Capture numbers and relative percentages obtained from the three methods vary strongly between species. The highest overall captures were obtained for Anopheles triannulatus with captures for the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet measuring more than 330 percent higher than captures obtained by human landings. For Anopheles darlingi, captures by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet were about 14 percent and 26 percent of human landing catches, respectively. Another species with malaria transmission potential that was not sampled by human landing captures weascaptured by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet (Anopheles oswaldoi). Both alternative sampling techniques can predict the human landing of Anopheles triannulatus, but without proportionality. Models for Anopheles darlingi counts, after totaling daily captures, are significant and proportional, but prediction models are more reliable when using the Shannon trap compared with the Mosquito magnet captures. CONCLUSIONS: These alternative capture methods can be partially recommended for the substitution of human landing captures or, at least, as complementary forms of monitoring for malarial mosquitoes.

INTRODUÇÃO: O presente estudo compara a captura através da isca humana dos principais vetores da malária, com dois métodos alternativos de captura, a armadilha luminosa de Shannon e a armadilha Mosquito magnet. MÉTODOS: O presente estudo utiliza modelos de regressão para ajustar os dados obtidos para uma distribuição binomial negativa. RESULTADOS: Os números e as proporções relativas obtidas nos três métodos variaram fortemente entre as espécies. A maior densidade capturada foi de Anopheles triannulatus, através das armadilhas de Shannon e do Mosquito magnet sendo mais de 330 por cento superior que a obtida pela captura por isca humana. Para Anopheles darlingi, capturas com a armadilha de Shannon e com o Mosquito magnet representaram cerca de 14 por cento e 26 por cento, respectivamente, em comparação com a captura através da isca humana. Outras espécies com potencial de transmissão da malária não foram capturadas com a utilização da isca humana, mas foram coletadas na armadilha de Shannon e no Mosquito magnet (Anopheles oswaldoi). Ambas as técnicas alternativas de captura, podem predizer significativamente a captura através da isca humana de Anopheles triannulatus, porém sem proporcionalidade. Os números previstos para o Anopheles darlingi, após a contagem total da captura diária, são significativos e proporcionais, mas a previsão é mais confiável para a armadilha de Shannon que para o Mosquito magnet. CONCLUSÕES: A comparação de métodos alternativos de captura pode ser parcialmente recomendada para a substituição da captura através da isca humana ou, pelo menos, como uma forma complementar de coleta de mosquitos.

Periodicidade de captura de Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae) em Porto Velho, RO / Periodicity of capture of the Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae) in Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil

Anopheles darlingi Root é o principal vetor de malária na Amazônia brasileira. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram avaliar a periodicidade de captura, a preferência por peri ou extradomicílio e a taxa de paridade de A. darlingi em quatro localidades em Porto Velho, RO, utilizando a atração humana. Todos os anofelinos capturados foram identificados e A. darlingi foi dissecada para caracterização da paridade. Do total de 985 anofelinos coletados, 972 eram A. darlingi. O número de fêmeas foi significativamente maior no extradomicílio em duas das localidades estudadas (São João e Candeias do Jamari) (P < 0,05). A taxa de paridade foi de 96 por cento e não foi observado horário preferencial para captura de fêmeas de A. darlingi nas localidades estudadas.

Anopheles darlingi Root is the principal malaria vector in Amazonia region. The objectives of this work were to study the periodicity of Anopheles darlingi Root, the host preference for peri or extra-domestic environments and the parous rate in four field sites in Porto Velho (RO) by human-landing. All of the Anopheles specimens collected were identified, but only A. darlingi was dissected for the parous study. The results showed that human-landing colleted a total of 985 anophelines, with A. darlingi (972) being the most abundant species. Female mosquitoes were more abundant at extra-domestic environments in two of the locations studied (São João e Candeias do Jamari) (P < 0.05). The parous rate was 96 percent and no periodicity was observed for captures of females of A. darlingi in the field sites.