RESUMEN
Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) is a progressive and fatal disease in domestic and wild cats, caused by Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus (FIPV). The disease is characterized by an immunomediated reaction against the virus in various organs. This work described a case report of fibrinous epicarditis caused by FIPV. A male cat, three years old, died and was received to be necropsied. Grossly, soft, multifocal to coalescing, whitish fibrinous exudate, measuring up the 2 centimeters of thickness, was observed in the epicardium, mostly at the apex of the heart. Microscopically, severe, multifocal to coalescing inflammatory infiltrate was observed in the epicardium, composed mainly by macrophages, plasmocytes and lymphocytes, associated with fibrin deposition. Immunohistochemistry was performed for FIPV and was positive in the areas of inflammation in the epicardium. To the author´s knowledge, this is the second report of epicarditis due to FIPV in a cat. Therefore, epicarditis should be considered a differential diagnosis of cardiac diseases in Feline Medicine.(AU)
A Peritonite Infecciosa Felina (PIF) é uma doença progressiva e fatal de felinos domésticos e selvagens, causada pelo vírus da Peritonite Infecciosa Felina (FIPV). A doença é caracterizada por uma reação imunomediada contra o vírus em vários órgãos. Este trabalho descreveu um relato de caso de epicardite fibrinosa causada pelo FPIV. Um gato macho, com três anos de idade, veio a óbito e foi recebido para necropsia. Macroscopicamente, foi observado exsudato fibrinoso esbranquiçado, friável, multifocal, medindo até 2 centímetros de espessura, no epicárdio, principalmente no ápice cardíaco. Microscopicamente, foi observado no epicárdio um infiltrado inflamatório misto, multifocal, composto por macrófagos, plasmócitos e linfócitos, associado a deposição de fibrina. A imuno-histoquímica foi positiva para o FIPV nas áreas de inflamação no epicárdio. Os autores descrevem o segundo relato de caso na literatura científica de epicardite causada pelo FIPV em um gato. Portanto, a epicardite deve ser considerada como diagnóstico diferencial em doenças cardíacas em Medicina Felina.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Animales , Gatos , Pericardio/patología , Peritonitis Infecciosa Felina/complicaciones , Coronavirus Felino/aislamiento & purificación , Inmunohistoquímica/veterinariaRESUMEN
Apesar da prevalência da peritonite infecciosa felina (PIF) ser alta em praticamente o mundo todo, estudos anatomopatológicos recentes acerca dessa doença são escassos. Não obstante, as características microscópicas da medula óssea de gatos com PIF estão ausentes da literatura consultada. O objetivo deste artigo é descrever alterações medulares ósseas vistas em casos espontâneos de PIF. As medulas ósseas colhidas sistematicamente da região diafisária dos fêmures de 16 gatos necropsiados no Laboratório de Patologia Veterinária (LPV) da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Rio Grande do Sul, entre janeiro de 2000 e junho de 2017, e que tiveram diagnóstico definitivo de PIF, foram avaliadas fenotípica (histopatologia - hematoxilina e eosina e histoquímica - reação de Perls) e imunofenotipicamente (utilizando marcadores mieloides (anti-MAC387) e de linfócitos (anti-CD79αcy e anti-CD3). Os resultados permitem afirmar que, independentemente da apresentação clinicopatológica da doença ocorrem as seguintes alterações: 1) hiperplasia mieloide; 2) hipoplasia eritroide, 3) displasia megacariocítica (dismegacariocitopoiese) e 4) plasmocitose medular. Exclusivamente nos casos de PIF seca há hemossiderose medular óssea e hepática. Essas alterações permitem estabelecer que gatos com PIF desenvolvem mielodisplasia, uma lesão mieloproliferativa muito semelhante àquela relatada em humanos infectados pelo HIV. Sugere-se que a partir dos achados aqui descritos, a mielodisplasia seja considerada a principal responsável pelas alterações hematológicas observadas na PIF, especialmente pela anemia e trombocitopenia arregenerativas frequentemente desenvolvidas pelos pacientes com essa doença.(AU)
Although the prevalence of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is high worldwide, recent anatomopathological studies about this disease are scarce. Information on the microscopic characteristics of the bone marrow in FIP-affected cats are absent in the available literature. Based on this, the purpose of this article is to describe bone marrow lesions seen in spontaneous cases of FIP. The bone marrow collected systematically from the femoral diaphysis of 16 cats necropsied in the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology (LPV) of the Federal University (UFSM) of Southern Brazil, between January 2000 and June 2017, with a definitive diagnosis of FIP, were evaluated phenotypically (histopathology - hematoxylin and eosin and histochemistry - Perls stain) and immunophenotypically (immunohistochemistry using myeloid - Anti-MAC387, and lymphocytic - Anti-CD79 αcy and Anti-CD3 markers). Regardless the following was observed the clinicopathological form of the disease ("dry" - noneffusive or "wet" - effusive): 1) myeloid hyperplasia; 2) erythroid hipoplasia; 3) megakaryocytic dysplasia (dismegakaryocytopoiesis); and 4) medullary plasmacytosis. Exclusively in cases of "dry FIP" was bone marrow and hepatic hemosiderosis. These lesions allowed establishing that cats with FIP develop myelodysplasia, a myeloproliferative lesion very similar to that reported in HIV-infected humans. It is suggested that, based on the findings described here, myelodysplasia is considered to be the main cause of hematological abnormalities observed in FIP, especially for non-regenerative anemia and thrombocytopenia, frequently developed by patients.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Animales , Gatos , Gatos/anomalías , Peritonitis Infecciosa Felina/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia/veterinaria , Defectos del Tubo Neural/diagnósticoRESUMEN
This study reports the infectious peritonitis rates in 44 patients on peritoneal dialysis in three different systems over the last 15 years, covering clinical outcomes, exit-site infections, tunnel infections, causative microorganisms, and the history of susceptibility of organisms causing peritonitis, in order to establish our center-specific selection of empiric therapy. Two microbiological procedures were herein used: method A, where 100 ml of dialysate were centrifuged and cultured in standard media and into blood-culture bottles; and method B, where 10 ml were directly injected into blood-culture bottles. Swabs from the exit-site or tunnel were taken when purulent drainage was observed. There were 96 episodes of peritonitis during 110.43 patient-years (0.87 episodes/patient-year). Sensitivity of method A was 96.88% (93/96 episodes) versus 81.25% (78/96) of method B (p= 0.001). Gram stain sensitivity was 36.46%. The etiologic agents were 64 (56.64%) gram-positive cocci, 22 (19.47%) gram-negative fermentative rods, 20 (17.7%) gram-negative non fermentative rods, 5 (4.43%) yeasts, 1 (0.88%) micelial fungus, and 1 (0.88%) anaerobic rod. Fifty-five exit-site infections were documented (0.5 episodes/patient-year). Ceftazidime and imipenem showed excellent activity on gram-negative rods. There were 92.3% of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus but only 33.3% of methicillin-susceptible coagulase- negative staphylococci; vancomycin was active against 100% of the gram-positive cocci. The clinical outcomes of peritonitis were 73 initial cure, 19 catheter removal and four related deaths. The empiric therapy in our center should be vancomycin plus ceftazidime or imipenem. Once the etiological agent and its susceptibility pattern are known, the deescalating therapy must be applied to avoid the emergence and spread of vancomycin-resistant microorganisms.
Se comunican las tasas de peritonitis infecciosa de 44 pacientes en tres sistemas diferentes de diálisis peritoneal durante los últimos 15 años. Se evaluaron evolución clínica, infecciones del sitio de salida y del túnel, y los microorganismos causales y su sensibilidad, a fin de seleccionar la mejor terapia empírica para nuestro centro. Se realizaron dos procedimientos microbiológicos, método A: 100 ml del dializado fueron centrifugados y cultivados por métodos convencionales y en frascos para hemocultivo; método B: 10 ml fueron directamente inoculados en frascos para hemocultivo. Los hisopados del sitio de salida y del túnel fueron realizados cuando se observó supuración. Se registraron 96 episodios de peritonitis en 110,43 paciente-años (0,87 episodios/paciente-año). La sensibilidad del método A fue 96,88% versus 81,25% del método B (p = 0,001). La sensibilidad de la coloración de Gram fue 36,46%. La distribución de los agentes etiológicos fue la siguiente: 64 (56,64%) cocos gram-positivos, 22 (19,47%) bacilos gram-negativos fermentadores, 20 (17,7%) bacilos gram-negativos no fermentadores, 5 (4,43%) levaduras, 1 (0,88%) hongo micelial, 1 (0,88%) bacilo anaerobio. Fueron documentadas 55 infecciones del sitio de salida (0,5 episodios/paciente-año). La ceftazidima y el imipenem mostraron una excelente actividad sobre los bacilos gram-negativos. La sensibilidad a meticilina fue de 92,3% para Staphylococcus aureus y 33,3% para estafilococos coagulasa negativos; la vancomicina fue activa frente al 100% de los cocos gram-positivos. La evolución clínica de las peritonitis fue: 73 curas, 19 remociones de catéter y cuatro muertes relacionadas. La terapia empírica en nuestro centro debería ser vancomicina más ceftazidima o imipenem. Una vez conocidos el agente etiológico y su sensibilidad, se debería aplicar la terapia de desescalonamiento para evitar la emergencia y diseminación de microorganismos resistentes a la vancomicina.