RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To analyze the patterns and characteristics of drug-related administrative penalty cases with medical institutions as parties from 2020 to 2022 in order to further improve drug management in medical institutions. METHODS A retrospective statistical analysis was used to summarize the drug-related administrative penalty decisions with medical institutions as parties， and to match them with the provisions of the Drug Administration Law （2019 version） for statistical analysis. RESULTS There were 144 complete administrative penalty decisions with medical institutions as parties. Analyzed by cause， 126 cases of administrative punishment for inferior drugs accounted for 87.50%， of which expired drugs accounted for more than 50.00% of the inferior drug cases； 15 cases （10.42%） were for purchasing drugs from enterprises or individuals not qualified to operate drugs. Analyzed by the range of punishment amount of the cases， 34 cases （23.61%） resulted in lighter penalties， while 81 cases （56.25%） resulted in reduced penalties. CONCLUSIONS There are extremely few medical institutions that have received administrative penalties for drug management violations. Medical institutions should strengthen the awareness of law-abiding， and know the red line of drug management and the illegal behavior that is easy to occur， so as to better strengthen drug quality management.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE：To provide reference for further clarifying the definition of counterfeit and inferior drugs and law enforcement for revelent departments ，and guaranteeing the safety of drug use and legitimate right for the public. METHODS ： Through comparative research ，literature research and interpretation of the new law ，comprehensive analysis and research was conducted for the relevant provisions of counterfeit and inferior drugs in the newly revised Drug Administration Law in respect of the definition ，penalty rules and identification basis of counterfeit and inferior drugs. The challenges and impacts of these changes on drug law enforcement were put forward from the perspective of drug law enforcement practice. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS ： In terms of definition ，the newly revised Drug Administration Law redefined the counterfeit and inferior drugs ，which was reduced from 15 cases before the amendment to 11 kinds，but the content was more abundant. It cancelled the concept of punishing counterfeit and inferior drugs ；increased the prohibition of the use of counterfeit and inferior drugs ；punished violation behavior of drug administration order not according to counterfeit and inferior drugs ；removed two items that being punished as counterfeit drugs；adjusted the definition of contaminated drugs from counterfeit drugs to inferior drugs ；clarified the definition of excipients. In terms of penalty provisions ，the provisions of legal liability for counterfeit and inferior drugs in the newly revised Drug Administration Law comprehensively used a variety of punishment measures ，greatly increased the amount of fine ；differentiated the situation of production ，wholesale and retail of inferior drugs ，and set different punishment ranges ；appropriately reduced the punishment range of producing and selling TCM decoction pieces that did not meet the drug standards ；increased the punishment for the violation of drug management order ，and the scope of punishment was similar to that of counterfeit and inferior @qq.com drugs. The “double penalty system ”was implemented for serious illegal acts and punished to individuals. The punishment for drug users who used counterfeit and inferior drugs was clarified. The situation of heavier punishment for producing and selling counterfeit and inferior drugs was increased ，and the first responsibility system and punitive compensation were added to protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. In terms of identification basis ，the newly revised Drug Administration Law had deleted the provisions that specific situation of quality inspection conclusion may not be specified ，and only provided the principle provisions. The challenges and impacts of the newly revised Drug Administration Law on law enforcement included how to understand the “ingredients”in the definition of counterfeit drugs；how to distinguish between deteriorated drugs and contaminated drugs ；how to investigate and deal with unauthorized acts ； whether drug inspection reports were required in all cases of counterfeit and inferior drugs ；how to understand the situation that did not affect the safety and effectiveness ，and connecting administrative law enforcement with criminal justice for counterfeit and inferior drugs ，etc. It is suggested to further strengthen the law popularization ，and introduce the interpretation of the newly revised Drug Administration Law as soon as possible ，clarify the legislative intent ，and guide the grassroots law enforcement ；issue Amendment Ⅺ to the Criminal Law of the People ’s Republic of China as soon as possible ，increase the charges of illegal acts against the order of drug administration ，do a good job in connecting administrative law enforcement with criminal justice and crack down on the illegal and criminal acts in the field of drugs ，and further promote the administration according to law.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE:To analyze relevant regulations in Drug Administration Law and to study the safety of drug use. METHODS:The key points of the safety of drug use were analyzed through reasoning analysis. RESULTS&CONCLUSION:The safety of drug use was the core of medicine legislation while there were still some problems on law execution and blind spots in legislation. It is suggested to standardize the research and development of drug and purchase channel,improve system for safety of drug use and role of clinical pharmacists so as to guarantee the safety of drug use.