RESUMEN
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, these drugs had a significant influence on treatment-related costs, which resulted in the development of biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the drug discontinuation rate in the IBD population who switched from originator to biosimilars in real-world switching studies and address potential nocebo effects as reasons for drug discontinuation. METHODS: Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and abstract databases of selected congresses were screened for reports of monoclonal antibody (mAb) switching with a minimum post-switch follow-up of >6 months or three infusions. All available information on discontinuation rates was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 30 observational studies were included, involving 3,594 patients with IBD. Twenty-six studies reported a switch from infliximab to CT-P13, two studies involved a switch to SB2, and switching information was not available in two studies. The discontinuation rates were 8%, 14%, and 21% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation and their respective risks were: disease worsening (2%), remission (4%), loss of adherence (4%), adverse events (5%), and loss of response (7%). The quality of the evidence ranged from low to very low depending on the outcome analyzed. Subjective symptoms leading to drug discontinuation were infrequently reported, and the nocebo effect was clearly assessed in just one of the included papers. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation rates following a switch to a biosimilar in patients with IBD increase over time. However, it was not possible to confirm the nocebo effect as a reason for discontinuation. Therefore, long-term studies evaluating the use of biosimilars to monitor adverse events and potential nocebo effects in post-marketing surveillance are still needed.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Os biológicos revolucionaram o tratamento da doença inflamatória intestinal (DII). Ademais, esses medicamentos influenciaram os custos relacionados ao tratamento. Tal aumento significativo nos gastos com o tratamento motivou desenvolvimento dos biossimilares. OBJETIVO: Esta revisão sistemática e metanálise objetivou avaliar a taxa de descontinuação de medicamentos na população com DII que foi submetida à troca do biológico originador para um biossimilar, em estudos observacionais que abordaram possíveis razões para a descontinuação do tratamento. MÉTODOS: Tendo como base de dados Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library e resumos de congressos médicos, foram rastreados artigos com relatos de troca de um biológico originador por um biossimilar, com acompanhamento pós-troca de no mínimo 6 meses ou três infusões. Todas as informações disponíveis sobre as taxas de descontinuação foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos no total 30 estudos observacionais, envolvendo 3.594 pacientes com DII. Vinte e seis estudos relataram uma mudança do infliximabe para CT-P13, dois estudos envolveram uma mudança para o SB2, e as informações sobre a troca não estavam disponíveis em dois estudos. As taxas de descontinuação foram de 8%, 14% e 21% aos 6, 12 e 24 meses, respectivamente. Os principais motivos para a descontinuação do medicamento e seus respectivos riscos foram: agravamento da doença (2%), remissão (4%), perda de adesão (4%), eventos adversos (5%) e perda de resposta (7%). A qualidade da evidência variou de baixa a muito baixa, dependendo do resultado analisado. Os sintomas subjetivos que levaram à descontinuação do medicamento foram relatados com pouca frequência, e o efeito nocebo foi claramente avaliado em apenas um dos artigos incluídos. CONCLUSÃO: As taxas de descontinuação após a mudança para um biossimilar em pacientes com DII aumentam com o tempo. No entanto, não foi possível confirmar o efeito nocebo como motivo da descontinuação. Portanto, ainda são necessários estudos em longo prazo avaliando o uso de biossimilares para monitorar eventos adversos e potenciais efeitos nocebo na vigilância pós-comercialização.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic, immune-mediated and chronic intestinal condition. In the present study, the effect of Serarud (IMOD®), a novel natural drug with known immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties was investigated in experimental colitis in rats and compared with the dexamethasone and infliximab. Immunologic colitis was induced by intracolonic administration of a mixture of trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) and absolute ethanol in male Wistar rats. Animals were divided into 6 groups of sham (normal group), control (vehicle-treated), positive control (dexamethasone 1 mg/kg/day given orally and infliximab 5 mg/kg/day given subcutaneously) and 3 Setarud-treated groups (13.3, 20, 30 mg/kg/day given intraperitoneally). The treatment continued for 14 consecutive days and then animals were decapitated on the day 15 and distal colons were removed for macroscopic, microscopic, and biochemical assays. Biochemical markers, including TNF-, IL-1, ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP), myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and thiobarbitoric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) were measured in the homogenate of colonic tissue. A remarkable reduction in macroscopic and histological damage scores was observed in the animals treated with Setarud. These findings were confirmed by decreased levels of TNF-, interleukin-1, MPO activity and TBARS, and raised levels of FRAP in the colon tissue. These observations confirmed the immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of Setarud in experimental colitis, which was comparable to those of dexamethasone and infliximab.