Valor diagnóstico de las clasificaciones outerbridge e ICRS para la clasificación artroscópica de lesiones condrales de rodilla / Diagnostic value of outerbridge and ICRS classifications for arthroscopic grading of chondral lesions in the knee

OBJETIVOS: Determinar el rendimiento de las clasificaciones de Outerbridge (OB) e International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). MÉTODO: Estudio de test diagnóstico, diseño y recolección de datos prospectivo. Siete traumatólogos sub-especialistas observaron un mismo video donde se exponían 30 lesiones condrales bajo visión artroscópica, para luego clasificarlas según OB e ICRS y consignar el tratamiento de elección para cada una de las lesiones, eligiendo entre 6 alternativas: observación, debridamiento mecánico o térmico, microfractura, OATS o terapias biológicas. Tras 7 días, los evaluadores debían repetir el mismo procedimiento. RESULTADOS: La concordancia entre los observadores fue débil para clasificación de ICRS (k 0,25 p < 0,001) y moderada para la clasificación de OB (k 0,45 p < 0,001). La concordancia intra-observador para ICRS oscilaba entre moderada y excelente (k promedio de 0,67), y para la clasificación de OB entre buena y excelente (k promedio 0,83). Ninguna de las dos clasificaciones mostró correlación con la experiencia del cirujano. En la elección de tratamiento, la concordancia entre observadores fue débil (k 0,33 p < 0,001), sin embargo, la concordancia intra-observador fue en todos los casos buena o excelente (k 0,82), mostrando una correlación directamente proporcional a la experiencia del cirujano. La capacidad de discriminación terapéutica, evaluada mediante una regresión logística, mostró un área bajo la curva roc en el rango del no-efecto. CONCLUSIÓN: Ambas clasificaciones mostraron una baja correlación inter-observador y una elevada concordancia intra-observador. En ambas categorías, Outerbridge fue más concordante que ICRS. En cuanto al tratamiento, ninguna de las dos clasificaciones logra unificar criterios quirúrgicos. NIVEL DE EVIDENCIA: Nivel I (test diagnóstico).

OBJECTIVES: Assess de diagnostic accuracy of Outerbridge (OB) and ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) classifications. METHODS: We performed a diagnostic test study, with a prospective design and data collection. Seven knee surgeons were asked to observe a video were the 30 chondral lesions were shown through arthroscopic view. Simultaneously they were asked to classify them according to OB and ICRS. Besides, they had to define how they would manage the chondral lesion, choosing among six treatment options (observation, mechanical or thermic chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral autologous transfer system (OATS) or biological therapies). A week later, they repeated the same procedure. Intra and interobserver agreement were characterized by κ statistical analysis, and a logistic regression was used to assess the ability of both classifications to discriminate among treatment options. P values < 0,05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was weak (κ 0.25 p < 0.001) for ICRS classification and moderate for OB classification (κ 0.45 p < 0.001). Intraobserver agreement for ICRS ranged from moderate to excellent (average κ of 0.67), and for the OB classification ranged from good to excellent (average kappa 0.83). Neither classification correlated with the surgeon's experience. Interobserver agreement for therapeutic choice was poor (κ 0.33 p < 0.001). However, intraobserver agreement was good to excellent (κ 0.82) in all cases, showing a direct correlation with the surgeon's experience. Logistic regression used to assess the ability of both classifications to discriminate among treatment options, showed in both cases an area under the roc curve in the no-effect range. CONCLUSION: Both classifications showed low interobserver and high intraobserver agreements for arthroscopic grading of chondral lesions. In both, Outerbridge was more reliable than ICRS. As for guiding therapeutic management, none of the classifications could unify surgical criteria.

Inter/intra-observer evaluation between radiographs and tomographies for proximal humerus fracture / Avaliação inter e intra-observador entre radiografias e tomografias para fratura de úmero proximal

ABSTRACT Objective: The use of images in 3D reconstruction is an instrument that facilitates the interpretation of the fracture, observations of deviations, rotations and articular surface. Objective: To evaluate the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Neer x AO proximal humerus fracture classification on radiographs versus computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction (3D). Methods: We evaluated the digital radiographs (anteroposterior and profile) and computerized tomography with 3D reconstruction of patients presenting with a proximal humerus fracture, surgically treated at an Orthopedics and Traumatology Service. All radiographs and computed tomography were classified (Neer and AO) by eight (8) orthopedic surgeons, specialists in the upper limb and sent, following the pre-established numeration by the author, in a spreadsheet to the author of the study. Results: The Neer and AO scores were more reproducible when determined by computed tomography with 3D reconstruction, mainly in fractures of greater complexity (Neer 4 parts and AO group C). However, in absolute values, inter and intra-observer reproducibility and concordance still remain low. Conclusion: Computed tomography with 3D reconstruction allows a better analysis of fractures of group C and Neer 4 parts. However, the inter and intra-observer agreement does not increase significantly in comparison to the radiographs. Level of evidence III, Study of non-consecutive patients, without gold standard, applied uniformly.

RESUMO Objetivo: O uso de imagens em reconstrução 3D são um instrumento facilitador na interpretação da fratura, observações dos desvios, rotações e superfície articular. Objetivo: Avaliar a confiabilidade inter-observador e intra-observador da classificação da fratura de úmero proximal, descrita por Neer x AO, em radiografias versus tomografias computadorizadas com reconstrução tridimensional (3D). Métodos: Avaliamos as radiografias digitais (anteroposterior e perfil) e tomografias computadorizadas com reconstrução 3D de pacientes que apresentavam fratura de úmero proximal, tratados cirurgicamente em um Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Todas as radiografias e tomografias computadorizadas foram classificadas (Neer e AO) por oito (8) cirurgiões ortopédicos especialistas em membro superior e enviadas, seguindo a numeração pré-estabelecida pelo autor, em uma planilha para o autor do trabalho. Resultados: A classificação de Neer e AO foram mais reprodutíveis quando determinadas pela tomografia computadorizada com reconstrução 3D, principalmente em fraturas de maior complexidade (Neer 4 partes e AO grupo C). Porém, em valores absolutos, a reprodutibilidade e concordância inter e intraobservador ainda permanecem baixas. Conclusão: A tomografia com reconstrução 3D, permite uma melhor análise das fraturas do grupo C e Neer 4 partes. Entretanto, não aumenta significativamente a concordância global inter e intraobservador em comparação as radiografias. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo de pacientes não consecutivos, sem padrão ouro, aplicados uniformemente.

Acuerdo intra-interobservador en las pruebas Minimental State Examination (MMSE) y Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test) aplicados por personal en entrenamiento / Intra and interrater reliability of the Minimental State Exmination (MMSE) and Montréal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test) applied by health personnel in training

Introducción: en el proceso del diagnóstico neuropsicológico, los instrumentos de tamizaje cognitivo, son una herramienta útil en la identificación de cambios mentales del sujeto, en momentos puntuales o a través del tiempo. Su uso se fundamenta en el análisis psicométrico. Objetivo: determinar el acuerdo inter e intra-observador en el MoCA test y el MMSE, aplicado por profesores y estudiantes en procesos de entrenamiento de tamización cognitiva. Materiales y métodos: a los estudiantes y profesores en entrenamiento en la puntuación del MoCA test y el MMSE, se les presentó un video en dos sesiones, con un intervalo de 5 meses, mostrando el desempeño de dos adultos mayores, respondiendo el MoCA test y el MMSE, previo consentimiento informado. Se compararon los puntajes dados en las dos sesiones por los sujetos en entrenamiento, con los de ellos mismos (intra-observador), usando el coeficiente de concordancia y correlación de Lin(rho) y con los del grupo restante (inter-observador) usando el coeficiente de correlación intra-clase (ICC). Resultados: participaron 46 evaluadores. Se encontró alta confiabilidad inter-observador para el MoCA (ICC=0.86), pero baja para el MMSE (ICC=0.24) y baja confiabilidad intra-observador tanto para el MoCA (rho paciente 1=0.012 y rho paciente 2=0.152) como para el MMSE (rho paciente 1=0.008 y rho paciente 2=0.012). Aunque los puntajes difirieron, las clasificaciones diagnósticas realizadas por los evaluadores fueron similares a las del patrón de oro. Conclusión: la correcta aplicación del test, requiere varios entrenamientos, y aunque hubo pocas diferencias entre los puntajes, los errores cuando se está cerca del punto de corte propuesto, aumentan el riesgo de sesgo.

Introduction: The instruments for screening cognitive functions, applied to subjects in clinical settings and research, are useful for determining if this person has any trouble in cognition or show changes in the time. The usefulness of these instruments is defined with the evaluation of their psychometrics properties. Objective: This study allows to determine the intra and inter-observer agreement, when the MoCA test and MMSE were applied by a group in training process Materials and methods: The study group who attended two training sessions, with an interval of 5 months, scored the MoCA test and MMSE, from two patients which were filmed responding the tests, previous informed consent signature. We compared how close were the scores of participants among themselves by concordance correlation coefficient of Lin (rho) and with those given from the others by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: In total, 46 participants were included. Intra-rater reliability was high for MoCA test (ICC = 0.86), but it was poor for MMSE (ICC=0.24). Inter-rater was poor for MoCA test (rho patient 1= 0.012, rho patient 2= 0.152) and MMSE (rho patient 1 = 0.008, rho patient 2 = 0.012). Although the scores between participants and gold standard were different, the diagnoses were similar. Conclusion:The correct scoring of the test, requires several trainings to clinical and research groups, and although they can be found few differences between scores applied by non-expert personnel, if the scores mistakenly given, are close to the cut-of point proposed for each test, the bias increases.

Variabilidad en la medición del índice acetabular / Variability in measurement of acetabular index

Introducción: La Displasia del desarrollo de la cadera (DDC) es un espectro de enfermedades que abarca desde la luxación franca de la cadera hasta la displasia acetabular leve. El screening de detección de DDC se realiza de rutina en nuestro país, mediante una radiografía de pelvis a los 3 meses. El índice acetabular medido en estas radiografías se utiliza para evaluar la cadera displásica, tanto en la presentación inicial como durante el seguimiento posterior. Objetivo: Evaluar la variabilidad tanto intra como inter observador en la medición del índice acetabular, entre profesionales médicos. Material y Métodos: Cuatro evaluadores (un cirujano-ortopédico infantil, un médico general, un pediatra y un radiólogo) realizaron la medición del índice acetabular en 100 radiografías de screening (200 caderas), en tres ocasiones, separadas por un mes cada una (600 mediciones totales). Un observador independiente evaluó la reproductibilidad en la medición. Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para determinar diferencias significativas. Resultados: La variabilidad intra observador fue menor que la interobservador. La variabilidad intra observador fue similar para los diferentes evaluadores, +/- 1,5°. La variabilidad inter observador fue de +/- 3,4°. Conclusiones: Demostramos una alta concordancia entre las mediciones, determinando una alta reproductibilidad del índice acetabular. El índice acetabular es un método seguro para el diagnóstico y seguimiento de displasia acetabular.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a spectrum of diseases ranging from frank dislocation of the hip to mild acetabular dysplasia. DDH screening for detection is performed routinely in our country using pelvic x-ray at 3 months of age. The radiographic measured acetabular index is used to evaluate the dysplastic hip, at initial presentation and during follow-up. Objective: Evaluation of the intra- and inter-observer variability, among medical professionals, when measuring acetabular index. Methods: Four reviewers (a children orthopedic surgeon, a general practitioner, a pediatrician and a radiologist) performed acetabular index measurement in 100 radiographs (200 hips), on three occasions, separated each by one month (600 total measurements). An independent observer evaluated the measurement reproducibility. The intra-class correlation coefficient to determine significant differences was used. Results: The intra-observer variability was less than the inter-observer variability. The intra-observer variability was similar among the different assessors, +/- 1.5 degrees. The inter-observer variability was +/- 3.4 degrees. Conclusions: A high concordance among measurements was reported, evidencing a high reproducibility of the acetabular index; this index is a reliable method for the diagnosis and follow-up of acetabular dysplasia.

Reprodutibilidade intra e interobservadores no ângulo de cobb em indivíduos escolióticos / Intra-and interobserver reproducibility in the Cobb angle in scoliosis patients

O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a variabilidade intra e interobservador do método de Cobb em indivíduos escolióticos. Foram avaliadas trinta e quatro radiografias de sujeitos com escoliose para mensuração do ângulo de Cobb. A avaliação intraobservador foi realizada por um avaliador, enquanto a avaliação interobservador foi realizada por três avaliadores. Foram controlados possíveis erros intrínsecos e extrínsecos de mensuração, mas não houve a pré-seleção das vértebras que caracterizam a escoliose. A concordância intra e interobservador foi avaliada pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson (p < 0,05). Não houve diferenças significativas de julgamento na condição intra e interobservadores. A magnitude dos coeficientes de correlação oscilou de bom até excelente nos níveis torácico e tóraco-lombar. Na coluna lombar não houve correlação em ambas as condições

Fuentes de variabilidad en el diagnóstico de gastritis atrófica multifocal asociada con la infección por Helicobacter pylori / Source of variation in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori-associated multifocal atrophic gastritis

Introducción: El mapeo de las diferentes regiones del estómago y el número de fragmentos de mucosa gßstrica disponibles para evaluación histopatológica son fuentes importantes de variación en el momento de clasificar y hacer la gradación de la gastritis crónica. Objetivos: Estimar la sensibilidad del número de fragmentos de mucosa gßstrica necesarios para establecer los diagnósticos de gastritis atrófica con metaplasia intestinal (MI), displasia y estado de infección por Helicobacter pylori. Ademßs evaluar la variabilidad intra-observador en la clasificación de estas lesiones precursoras del cancer gastrico. Materiales y métodos: En una cohorte de 6 a±os de seguimiento se evaluaron 1,958 procedimientos de endoscopia realizados por dos gastroenterólogos. En cada procedimiento y de cada participante se obtuvieron 5 biopsias de mucosa gßstrica que representaban antro, incisura angularis y cuerpo. Un único patólogo hizo la interpretación histológica de las 5 biopsias y proporcionó un diagnóstico definitivo global que se utilizó como patrón de referencia. Cada fragmento de mucosa gßstrica examinado condujo a un diagnóstico individual para cada biopsia que se comparó con el patrón de referencia. La variabilidad intra-observador se evaluó en 127 personas que corresponden a una muestra aleatoria de 20% del total de endoscopias hechas a los 72 meses de seguimiento. Resultados: La sensibilidad del diagnóstico de MI y displasia gßstrica aumentó de manera significativa con el número de fragmentos de mucosa gßstrica evaluados El sitio anatómico de mayor sensibilidad para el diagnóstico de MI y displasia fue la incisura angularis. Para descubrir H. pylori se logró alta sensibilidad con el estudio de un solo fragmento de mucosa gastrica (95.9%) y fue independiente del sitio de obtención de la biopsia. El acuerdo intra-observador para el diagnóstico de gastritis crónica fue 86.1% con valor kappa de 0.79 IC 95% (0.76-0.85).

Introduction: Multiple sampling from different sites of the stomach as well as the number of fragments of gastric mucosa available for histopathologic evaluation are important sources of variation when classifying and grading chronic gastritis. Objective: To estimate the sensitivity of the number of fragments of gastric mucosa necessary to establish the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia, gastric dysplasia and H. pylori infection. In addition, this study will attempt to assess the intra-observer variability in the classification of these premalignant gastric lesions. Methods: This is a 6 year-cohort study, wherein 1958 gastric endoscopic procedures performed by two gastroenterologists were reviewed. Five gastric biopsy samples were obtained from the antrum, body and lesser curvature during each procedure. One pathologist was in charge of reviewing the five histopathology samples for each subject and providing a definitive diagnosis which was used as the gold standard. Each gastric mucosa sample reviewed led to an individual diagnosis for that sample which was compared with the gold standard. Intra-observer variability was assessed in 127 individuals who correspond to a random sample of 20% of the total endoscopic procedures performed during the 72 month-follow-up. Results: The sensitivity of the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and gastric dysplasia increased proportionally with the number of gastric mucosa samples reviewed. The lesser curvature of the stomach had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of IM and dysplasia, among all the stomach regions studied. Just one sample of gastric mucosa attained a sensitivity of 95.9% for the detection of H. pylori infection. The intra-observer agreement for the diagnosis of multifocal atrophic gastritis was 86.1% and the kappa value was 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.85). Alcohol-fixed biopsy specimens were inadequate to diagnose H. pylori infection and to assess dysplasia.