RESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on left ventricular (LV)dyssynchrony in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy(IDC).Methods In this study,we randomly assigned 65 IDC patients from January 2009 to June 2011 to re-ceive carvedilol or metoprolol succinate.All patieats were divided in to carvedilol group(n=33)and metoprolol group(n=32)Echo-cardiographic measurements and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels were obtained at baseline and 6 month after thera-py.Then long-term follow up the survival rate of patients were observed.Results In carvedilol group,reduction in LVEDS and in-crease in LVEF was higher compared to metoprolol group.Also improvement in LV dyssynchrony achieved and survival rate with carvedilol was higher than metoprolol.However,Improvements in LV mechanical dyssynchrony was similar in two groups.Im-provements in LV mechanical dyssynchrony achived with both drugs were accompanied by reduction in NT-pro-BNP levels in both carvedilol and metoprolol groups(P >0.05).Conclusion Carvedilol is an effective drug improves the intraventricular dyssynchro-nyfor for IDC patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony,and could increasea the survival rate.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Impaired exercise tolerance with dyspnea is common in hypertensive patients and this may be due to the exaggeration of nonuniform ventricular activation during exercise. So we want to evaluate the effect of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on systolic intraventricular dyssynchrony during exercise. METHODS: A total of 85 patients with hypertension who having exertional dyspnea and 30 control individuals were enrolled. Exercise stress echocardiography was performed using a symptom limited, multistage supine bicycle test. To evaluate the dyssynchrony of left ventricular (LV), we calculated the standard deviation (SD) of the averaged time-to-peak systolic velocity (TPs-SD, ms) of 12 middle and basal LV segments obtained from the three standard apical views at rest and peak exercise. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate between the two groups. TPs-SD was significantly higher in patients with LVH at rest (31.5 +/- 12.1 vs. 22.0 +/- 12.6 ms, p = 0.002) with exaggeration of the degree at peak exercise (39.0 +/- 11.9 vs. 24.6 +/- 13.3 ms, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed LV mass index was independently associated with LV dyssynchrony at peak exercise (beta = 0.515, p = 0.001) when controlled for age, sex, and systolic BP at peak exercise. CONCLUSION: Intraventricular systolic dyssynchrony during exercise is significantly associated with the degree of LVH in hypertensive patients.