RESUMEN
Objective To study the mechanisms of vertebrae semi-dislocation of Tuina manipulation for treating patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion (LIDP) by observing the three-dimensional (3D) displacement of lumbar before and after Tuina manipulation. Methods Ten LIDP patients were selected and evenly divided into two groups: Group 1 as tendon-smoothing manipulation group (relaxing group), Group 2 as tendon-smoothing plus adjusting manipulation group (adjusting group). Besides, Group 3 as control group was established by 5 healthy volunteers treated with tendon-smoothing manipulation. Before and after manipulation intervention, all subjects were scanned from L1 to L5 segment by using Philips 64 spiral CT under equal conditions for accessing the volume data. ITK reconstruction software was used to reconstruct each lumbar skeleton for finite element analysis. The 3D displacements and angular displacements among three groups were compared. Results 3D displacement from L1 to L5 segment all changed in three groups. For adjusting group, the angular displacements at X-axis in L3 segment was (1.77±0.46)°, and that in L4 segment at X-axis and Y-axis was (1.78±0.53)° and (1.89±0.75)°, respectively, which was significantly larger than relaxing group and control group (P<0.05); the angular displacements at X-axis from L1 to L5 segment were (1.50±0.47)°, (1.55±0.57)°, (1.77±0.46)°, (1.78±0.53)°, (1.61±0.39)°, respectively, which were significantly larger than control group (P<0.05); displacement at Y-axis in L3 segment was (2.87±0.74) mm, and that at X-axis in L4 segment was (1.68±0.64) mm, which were significantly larger than relaxing group and control group (P<0.05); displacement at X-axis in L1, L4 and L5 segment was (1.28±0.21),（1.68±0.64）, (1.30±0.51） mm, and that at Y-axis in L1 to L3 segment was (1.92±0.42), (2.25±0.61), (2.87±0.74) mm, which was significantly larger than control group (P<0.05). The angular displacements and displacements of L1 to L5 segment in relaxing group were larger than those in control group, but without any significant differences. Conclusions Compared with relaxing manipulation, adjusting manipulation played a more obvious adjusting role in instability and degenerative lumbar vertebra, especially for angular displacements in X-axis, and displacements in X-axis and Y-axis. Namely, the mechanisms of vertebrae semi-dislocation of adjusting manipulation were to make horizontal and rotational displacements at lumbar vertebra other than upper and lower displacement. The effect of relaxing manipulation was not so obvious on lumbar structure of LIDP patients.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the effect of lubar intervertebral disc protrusion(LIDP)treated with quick bone manipulation.Methods 200 patients with LIDP were randomly recurited into a treatment group(n=100)and a control group(n=100).The treatment group was treated by quick bone manipulations,and the control group was treated with Ibupmfen PO.Results The total effective rate in the treatment group(95.5%)was significantly better as compared to the control group(73.0%).Conclusion Ouick bone manipulation is effective in treating LIDP.
RESUMEN
Objective To observe the clinical effects of treating LIDP with needle-knife therapy plus balance.acupuncture therapy.Methods 120 LIDT patients were randomly recruited into a treatment group and a control group.with 60 patients in each group.The treatment group was treated with needle-knife therapy plus balance-acupuncture therapy andthe control group was treated with needle-knife therapy exclusively.The therapeutic effects were evaluated after thetreatment.Resuits There was significant difference between the two groups in terms of recovery rateandthe course of treatment. Conclusion Needle-knife therapy plus balance-acupuncture therapy was obvious better than exclusive needle-knife therapy in treating LIDT in terms of recovery rate and the course of treatment.
RESUMEN
@#ObjectiveTo observe the curative effect of the Chinese traditional medicine combined with traction and physical therapeutic on lumbar intervertebral discprolapse (LIDP).Methods95 LIDP patients were randomly divided into the treatment group (50 cases) and control group (45 cases). Patients of the treatment group were treated by Chinese traditional medicine, traction and physical therapy. Patients of the control group were treated by traction and physical therapy only.ResultsThe total clinical effective rate of the treatment group was 100%, but that of the control group was 75.6%, there was a significant difference between two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionChinese traditional medicine therapeutics is an effective non-surgical therapeutics for LIDP.
RESUMEN
[Objective] To observe imaging changes of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Protrusion(LIDP)treated by Leverage Location manipulation.[Methods] 33 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion were observed(male=19,female=14),4 cases of expand type,25 cases of the outstanding type,4 cases of the free type.Using lever to observe the CT imaging of the cases.[Results]The 24 cases had no change in degree of Intervertebral Disc Protrusion while 9 cases had the changes.29 cases changed the compression relation between the nerve root and the lumbar intervertebral protrusion.Another 4 cases had nothing changed.[Conclusion] Leverage location manipulation has a little effect on changing the degree of the lumbar intervertebral protrusion,but can change compression relation between the nerve root and the lumbar intervertebral protrusion which proves that leverage location manipulation has effect on curing the LIDP.