The Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Technique: A Preliminary Experience

PURPOSE: Surgery is the only treatment for anal fistula. Many surgical techniques have been described. The aim of this study was to communicate the authors' preliminary experience in the use of a recently proposed, simplified technique. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 28 patients admitted from January 13, 2016 through July 20, 2017. Patients were managed with the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique and results were observed and documented, including recurrence rate, incontinence rate, and other postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were studied. The mean operation time was 31 minutes (range, 23–44 minutes), and there were no intra- and postoperative complications. The overall complete healing rate was 85.7%, and the recurrence rate was 14.2%. Follow-up was conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Many surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of anal fistula. The correct choice of surgical technique out of available procedures is the most important factor for proper treatment and reducing the risk of recurrence or incontinence. In the authors' experience, the LIFT technique is simple and easy to learn, and is a good choice for the treatment of simple anal fistula; however, a tailored surgery remains the gold standard for this condition.

Evaluación de la arteria alveolo-antral mediante tomografía volumétrica en población mexicana y su relación con levantamiento del piso del seno maxilar / CBCT evaluation of the alveolar antral artery in a mexican cohort and its relationship to maxillary sinus floor lifting

Introducción: El conocimiento de la anatomía de la región maxilar debe ser esencial para el cirujano antes de realizar levantamiento del seno maxilar para evitar complicaciones. La arteria alveolo antral forma una anastomosis intraósea con la arteria infraorbitaria a nivel de la pared antero lateral del seno maxilar, aproximadamente a una distancia de entre 18.9 y 19.6 mm desde el reborde alveolar maxilar. La arteria alveolo antral es la encargada de dar vascularidad a la membrana mucosa del seno maxilar, pared antero lateral del seno y tejido perióstico subyacente.Objetivo: Describir y establecer la frecuencia, diámetro y localización dela anastomosis entre la arteria infraorbitaria y la arteria alveolar posterior superior, llamada arteria alveolo antral y su relación con la cresta ósea alveolar en una población mexicana. Material y métodos: Se realizaun protocolo de estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal en una población de 1,116 pacientes derecho habientes del Instituto de Seguridad Social y Servicios para los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), en el oriente de la Ciudad de México, mediante la revisión de estudios de tomografía volumétrica computarizada. Resultados: Se encuentra la anastomosis arterial en el 90 por ciento de los estudios revisados, correspondiente a 1,005 estudios de tomografía.

Introduction: In order to avoid complications, it is essential for surgeonsto have a detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the superior maxillarybone prior to performing any sinus lift procedure. The alveolarantral artery forms an intraosseous anastomosis with the infraorbitalartery at the level of the anterolateral wall of the maxillary antrum at anapproximate distance of between 18.9 and 19.6 mm from the maxillaryalveolar ridge. The alveolar antral artery is responsible for providingvascularity to the mucous membrane of the maxillary sinus, the anteriorlateral wall of the sinus, and the underlying periosteal tissue. Objective:To analyze and establish the frequency, diameter, and locationof the anastomosis between the infraorbital artery and the posteriorsuperior alveolar artery known as the alveolar antral artery, and itsrelationship to the alveolar bone crest in a Mexican cohort. Materialand methods. We conducted a cross-sectional observational descriptivestudy involving a cohort comprised of 1,116 patients of the Institute forSocial Security and Services for State Workers (ISSSTE) on the eastside of Mexico City. The study consisted of a review of CBCT studies.Results: The arterial anastomosis was found in 90% of the 1,005 CBCTstudies reviewed, based on which the following values were determinedfor the distance between the alveolar ridge and the canal of the alveolarantral artery: for the fi rst premolar, 18.24 mm; second premolar,17.35 mm; fi rst molar, 16.96 mm, and for the second molar, 18.75 mm.Conclusions: We established the average measurements for the locationof the vascular bundle in question and the measurements neededto safeguard it along its course, which is important for the preservationand osseointegration of bone grafts placed during maxillary sinus liftprocedures, thus providing a margin of safety not previously reportedin the literature for a Mexican cohort.

Análise da utilização do osteoscafTM como substituto ósseo em cirurgia de levantamento de seio maxilar / Use of OsteoScaf™ in maxillary sinus augmentation

Procedimentos de levantamento do seio maxilar têm sido realizados para aumentar o volume ósseo e promover a estabilidade do implante, na região posterior de maxilas severamente atrofiadas. Ao longo dos anos, resultados de vários estudos demonstraram que alguns substitutos ósseos podem suportar implantes em função, após o levantamento de seio maxilar, igual ou melhor quando utilizado o osso autógeno. Neste estudo, foi avaliado o comportamento de um substituto ósseo completamente biodegradável (OsteoScaf™) no modelo experimental de levantamento de seio maxilar em coelhos. Além disso, ele foi comparado com o osso autógeno e outros dois substitutos ósseos, não totalmente biodegradáveis, disponíveis comercialmente (Bio-Oss® e BoneCeramic®). Avaliação clínica, tomografia computadorizada por feixe cônico, microtomografia computadorizada, análises microscópicas e análise molecular, através da técnica de PCR, foram realizadas após 2, 4 e 8 semanas de cirurgia. O levantamento de seio maxilar utilizando o osso autógeno demonstrou maior reabsorção, ao longo do tempo, comparado aos substitutos ósseos, os quais revelaram maior neoformação óssea após 8, 4 e 2 semanas, respectivamente. O grupo Bio-Oss® apresentou maior neoformação óssea, ao longo do tempo, quando comparado aos grupos Osteoscaf™ e BoneCeramic®, os quais foram qualitativamente emelhantes. O grupo BoneCeramic® mostrou uma resposta celular de células gigantes até 8 semanas. Concluiu-se que os substitutos ósseos, neste estudo, obtiveram melhor desempenho do que o osso autógeno, e o OsteoScaf™ demonstrou maior reabsorção do que os outros grupos, em todos períodos.

Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures have been applied to increase bone volume and to promote stability of implants in the severely atrophied posterior maxilla. Over the years, the outcomes of several studies have demonstrated that some bone substitutes can support implants in function after sinus augmentation as well as, or better than those with autogenous bone. Our experimental model evaluated the behavior of a fully biodegradable bone substitute (OsteoScaf™) in a rabbit sinus lift procedure. We compared this with autogenous bone and other two available non-biodegradable bone substitutes (Bio-Oss® and BoneCeramic®). Clinical evaluation, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Microcomputed Tomography, microscopic and molecular evaluation were used for data analysis at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after sinus augmentation. Autogenous bone was more resorbed over time than the other materials. All bone substitutes showed more bone formation at 8, 4 and 2 weeks, respectively. Bio-Oss® showed more bone formation/timepoint than Osteoscaf™ and Boneceramic®, which were similar. Boneceramic® showed a florid giant cell response up to 8 weeks. We concluded that the bone graft materials all performed better than autogenous bone and OsteoScaf™ showed comparative bone growth yet greater degradation than the other two materials.

Análise da utilização do osteoscafTM como substituto ósseo em cirurgia de levantamento de seio maxilar / Use of OsteoScaf™ in maxillary sinus augmentation

Procedimentos de levantamento do seio maxilar têm sido realizados para aumentar o volume ósseo e promover a estabilidade do implante, na região posterior de maxilas severamente atrofiadas. Ao longo dos anos, resultados de vários estudos demonstraram que alguns substitutos ósseos podem suportar implantes em função, após o levantamento de seio maxilar, igual ou melhor quando utilizado o osso autógeno. Neste estudo, foi avaliado o comportamento de um substituto ósseo completamente biodegradável (OsteoScaf™) no modelo experimental de levantamento de seio maxilar em coelhos. Além disso, ele foi comparado com o osso autógeno e outros dois substitutos ósseos, não totalmente biodegradáveis, disponíveis comercialmente (Bio-Oss® e BoneCeramic®). Avaliação clínica, tomografia computadorizada por feixe cônico, microtomografia computadorizada, análises microscópicas e análise molecular, através da técnica de PCR, foram realizadas após 2, 4 e 8 semanas de cirurgia. O levantamento de seio maxilar utilizando o osso autógeno demonstrou maior reabsorção, ao longo do tempo, comparado aos substitutos ósseos, os quais revelaram maior neoformação óssea após 8, 4 e 2 semanas, respectivamente. O grupo Bio-Oss® apresentou maior neoformação óssea, ao longo do tempo, quando comparado aos grupos Osteoscaf™ e BoneCeramic®, os quais foram qualitativamente emelhantes. O grupo BoneCeramic® mostrou uma resposta celular de células gigantes até 8 semanas. Concluiu-se que os substitutos ósseos, neste estudo, obtiveram melhor desempenho do que o osso autógeno, e o OsteoScaf™ demonstrou maior reabsorção do que os outros grupos, em todos períodos.

Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures have been applied to increase bone volume and to promote stability of implants in the severely atrophied posterior maxilla. Over the years, the outcomes of several studies have demonstrated that some bone substitutes can support implants in function after sinus augmentation as well as, or better than those with autogenous bone. Our experimental model evaluated the behavior of a fully biodegradable bone substitute (OsteoScaf™) in a rabbit sinus lift procedure. We compared this with autogenous bone and other two available non-biodegradable bone substitutes (Bio-Oss® and BoneCeramic®). Clinical evaluation, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Microcomputed Tomography, microscopic and molecular evaluation were used for data analysis at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after sinus augmentation. Autogenous bone was more resorbed over time than the other materials. All bone substitutes showed more bone formation at 8, 4 and 2 weeks, respectively. Bio-Oss® showed more bone formation/timepoint than Osteoscaf™ and Boneceramic®, which were similar. Boneceramic® showed a florid giant cell response up to 8 weeks. We concluded that the bone graft materials all performed better than autogenous bone and OsteoScaf™ showed comparative bone growth yet greater degradation than the other two materials.

CLINICO-ANATOMICAL STUDY OF SEPTUM IN THE MAXILLARY SINUS

Several reports have suggested a risk of problems due to sinus septum during the sinus lift procedure. However, there has been no wide-ranging clinico-anatomical study of sinus septum. This study was performed to examine the occurrence and anatomical characteristics of sinus septum of the maxillary sinus. The computed tomographs of the maxillary sinus in 488 patients were analyzed. THe incidence, location, and orientation of the septum were examined. The septa were observed in 177 of 488 patients (24.0%). The septa could be observed at any age (from 7 to 74 years). The incidence of sinus septum was higher in female (30.8%) than in male (20.8%). The average number of present septa in one patient was 1.56+/-0.84. One hundred and fifty-seven septa (86.3%) were oriented in a buccopalatal plane, 16 septa (8.8%) in a sagittal plane, and 9 septa (4.9%) in a transverse plane. There were no significant differences in location of septa within the maxillary sinus. These results were suggested that the incidence of sinus septum was 24.0%, and its shape and location were irregular. The identification of sinus septum should occur prior to the sinus lift procedure so that the modification of the basic sinus lift procedure can be planned according to the shape and the location of septa. Then successful results may be achieved through surgical removal of septa or several modifications to the sinus lift procedure.