Keratorefractive surgery practice in a tertiary eye care center in central India / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To study the patient characteristics and keratorefractive surgery(KRS)practice in central India.METHOD: The retrospective study was conducted on 410 patients who underwent KRS from June 2017 to April 2022 at a tertiary eye care center in central India. Demographic data of the patients presenting for the spectacle free vision like age, sex, residence in the form of urban or rural area, refractive error, cause for spectacle-free vision, best-corrected visual acuity, types of procedure, postoperative follow-up and complications were recorded.RESULTS: Among the 410 patients who presented for spectacle-free vision, 324 patients were considered for KRS(79.0%), and 200 patients(61.7%)underwent the laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis(LASIK)procedure, whereas 124 patients(38.3%)underwent the photorefractive keratectomy(PRK)procedure. The final study group comprised 179 female and 145 male. The mean age of the patients was(25±3.5)years. A majority of patients were from urban areas(n=250, 77.2%). The mean preoperative manifest refraction in the right and left eyes was -4.5±2.1 and -4.9±2.0, respectively. The mean surgical time in the LASIK patient was(15±2)min and(17±3)min for both eyes in PRK. None of the patients exhibited epithelial ingrowth, flap healing complications, or infection, and none of them required enhancement. Suboptimal corneal thickness(n=28, 32.6%)was the most common reason for rejection. At the end of the 1-year follow up, 3 patients who underwent the LASIK procedure exhibited regression(-0.5 D±1 D), with a refractive error correction of -6.75 D, -8.5 D, and -7.0 D, respectively.CONCLUSION: LASIK is the predominant procedure for the correction of refractive error in the central Indian population. Although the number of PRK procedures was small, both LASIK and PRK exhibited excellent visual outcome. Myopic regression should be considered when choosing LASIK for high myopia.

Repositioning of a Free Cap after Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To report a case of irregular astigmatism caused by a free flap during laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery that was treated with a flap rotation based on postoperative topography. CASE SUMMARY: A 21-year-old female underwent LASIK, which was complicated by a free cap on her right eye. Because the gentian violet markings were no longer present, the exact orientation of the cap was unknown. At 3 months after surgery, the astigmatism of the right eye was −3.00 diopters (D) with an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 0.4, and the astigmatism of the left eye was −0.75 D with an UCVA of 1.0. The corneal topography was analyzed in order to return to the existing position. Free cap repositioning was performed and irregular astigmatism was corrected to improve the UCVA to 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: If the preoperative markings cannot be identified on a free flap during LASIK, secondary postoperative corneal topographic analysis can be performed to restore the corneal free flap to its original position to minimize astigmatism with good visual outcomes.

Management of Complication after Hyperopic Laser-assisted in-situ Keratomileusis

PURPOSE: We present a case of a patient who underwent corneal refractive surgery to improve their corrected visual acuity due to a complication of hyperopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). CASE SUMMARY: The patient complained of decreased vision after hyperopic LASIK surgery 12 years prior. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/200 in the right eye and 20/32 in the left, with manifested refractions of +1.25 +2.00 × 90 and -0.25 +2.00 × 80, respectively. The patient had a with-the-rule astigmatism. The values of corneal and total spherical aberration, which can be determined as coefficients of the Zernike polynomials, were respectively -1.027 µm and -0.773 µm in the right eye and -0.965 µm and -0.881 µm in the left eye. Slit lamp biomicroscopy revealed no remarkable findings. We performed surface ablation surgery to flatten the central cornea of the patient's right eye. At 12 months after surgery, the CDVA of the patient's right eye was 20/30 and the negative corneal spherical aberration was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal refractive surgery to reduce negative corneal spherical aberration by flattening the central cornea is one of possible treatment options for the reduced corrected distance visual acuity after hyperopic LASIK.

The Effect of Anti-glaucoma Eyedrops and 0.1% Fluorometholone on Myopic Regression after LASIK or LASEK

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of combined medical treatment with anti-glaucoma eyedrops and 0.1% fluorometholone on visual acuity and refractive errors in patients complaining of blurred vision due to myopic regression after laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK). METHODS: This study comprised 155 patients (155 eyes) who were diagnosed with myopic regression after LASIK or LASEK and received medical treatment from January 2015 to January 2016. The visual acuity and refractive errors were compared before and after medical treatment and evaluated to determine whether the results differ between LASIK and LASEK. RESULTS: The mean time of medical treatment was 64.1 ± 36.8 months after surgery. The responder group whose vision was improved and whose myopic error was decreased after medical treatment was comprised of 63 patients (41%). Their visual acuity in this group improved -0.21 ± 0.11 logMAR, and the amount of myopic error decreased 0.56 ± 0.32 diopters. The full responder group was 24 patients (15%), and the partial responder group was 39 patients (26%). The frequency of response to medical treatment was higher after LASIK than after LASEK, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combined medical treatment with anti-glaucoma eyedrops and 0.1% fluorometholone was effective in 41% of patients with regard to visual acuity improvement when used for post-LASIK or post-LASEK myopic regression. The medical treatment was effective after both LASIK and LASEK.

Clinical Results of Wavefront-guided LASIK

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided LASIK performed by 2 different laser platforms. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive cases of eyes that underwent wavefront-guided LASIK by using the VISX S4 CustomVue system and the Zyoptix Z100 system advanced personalized mode. All procedures were performed by one surgeon. Fifty-six eyes of 36 patients were included. Of the 56 eyes, 30 eyes underwent LASIK by using the VISX S4 CustomVue system (CustomVue group), and other 26 eyes underwent LASIK by using the Zyoptix Z100 system (APT group). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, total high order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration (SA) and Q-value were recorded preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of preoperative UCVA, BCVA, manifest refraction, high order aberrations, Q-value and contrast sensitivity. Induced amount of SA was significantly lower in CustomVue group than in APT group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK performed by 2 different laser platforms caused clinically acceptable outcomes including good visual acuity and contrast sensitivity through 3 months. Furthermore, LASIK performed by VISX S4 CustomVue system caused less SA at three months after operation.

Clinical Outcomes of LASIK Using a 213 nm Solid-State Laser System: 6-month Follow-up

PURPOSE: To present prospective clinical results of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a solid-state laser system for the correction of mild to moderate myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: Thirty-eight eyes underwent LASIK using a 213 nm solid-state laser (Pulzar Z1trade mark, CustomVistrade mark, Australia). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive errors, higher order aberrations (HOA) and contrast sensitivity were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative mean spherical and cylindrical refractive errors were -3.27+/-0.85D, +1.04+/-0.69D, -0.36+/-0.7D and +0.14+/-0.2D, respectively. UCVA over 20/25 was obtained in 27 eyes (93%). A result within 1.00D of the desired correction was achieved in 90% of the eyes. There were no decreases in BCVA within the study group. The preoperative and postoperative root-mean-square of HOA at 3 months were 0.196+/-0.092 microm and 0.326+/-0.107 microm respectively. The preoperative and postoperative contrast sensitivity values were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of LASIK using a solid-state laser system were comparable to the conventional refractive surgery in mild to moderate myopia. The 213 nm solid state laser may be an alternative option for refractive surgery.