Assessment of Serum Lipoprotein(a) Status in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction: Lipoprotein (a) is made up of an atherogenic LDL lipoparticle and a potentially thrombogenic apoprotein a and is therefore responsible for cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study is to evaluate serum lipoprotein (a) status and to investigate the correlation of elevated serum lipoprotein (a) levels with other cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetics.Materials and Methods: This is a case-control study involving 82 patients, 37 type 2 diabetic patients and 45 non-diabetic control subjects. Sociodemographic data were collected and each patient underwent routine lipid assessment and lipoprotein (a) testing.Results: The prevalence of hyperlipoproteinemia (a) is 17.8% in control subjects and 29.7% in type 2 diabetics. HDL cholesterolemia is significantly higher in controls than in type 2 diabetics (p =0.028) while LDL cholesterol and serum lipoprotein (a) levels are higher in type 2 diabetics than in controls with a statistically significant difference (p=0.025 and p=0.026 respectively). The mean lipoprotein (a) values ??of 0.36�34 g/l in women are higher than those of male subjects which are 0.28�20 g/l (p=0.171). Mean serum lipoprotein (a) levels of 0.39�32 g/l in type 2 diabetics are significantly higher than those of controls which are 0.25�21 g/l (p= 0.026). Plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) vary with age and appear to be increased beyond the age of 45. There is no correlation between lipoprotein (a) and other cardiovascular risk factors.Conclusion: Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) is common in type 2 diabetics and women have the highest plasma levels. Serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations are not correlated with other cardiovascular risk factors and therefore constitute an independent risk factor.

Level of serum lipoprotein a in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its impact on prognosis / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective:To investigate the level of serum lipoprotein a [Lp (a)] in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and its clinical significance.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed. The clinical data of 87 patients with DLBCL who were treated at Changshu No.2 People's Hospital from January 2017 to June 2022 (the newly treated DLBCL group) were retrospectively analyzed, and 78 healthy physical examination subjects were selected as the control group. The level of Lp(a) in the two groups and the level of Lp(a) in DLBCL patients achieving different therapeutic effects after treatment were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the efficacy of serum Lp(a) in predicting the therapeutic effect of DLBCL patients, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the optimal critical value. Based on the optimal critical value, patients with DLBCL were divided into low Lp(a) group and high Lp(a) group, and the clinicopathological characteristics of DLBCL patients with different Lp(a) levels were compared. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of DLBCL patients. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of DLBCL patients with different Lp(a) levels.Results:The level of Lp (a) in the newly treated DLBCL group was higher than that in the control group[ (0.24±0.09) g/L vs. (0.09±0.06) g/L], and the difference was statistically significant ( t = 3.61, P = 0.019). Among 87 patients, 54 achieved complete remission (CR), 23 achieved partial remission (PR), and 10 achieved progression of the disease (PD). The Lp (a) levels of patients achieving CR, PR, and PD were (0.09±0.09) g/L, (0.12±0.08) g/L, and (0.25±0.15) g/L, respectively. The Lp (a) levels in patients achieving CR and PR were lower than those in the newly treated DLBCL patients [(0.24±0.09) g/L], and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the Lp (a) levels between patients achieving PD and the newly treated DLBCL patients ( P > 0.05). The ROC curve results showed that the optimal critical value of serum Lp (a) in predicting the efficacy of DLBCL patients was 0.25 g/L, AUC was 0.776 (95% CI: 0.676-0.876, P < 0.05), and its sensitivity and specificity was 66.67%, 82.76%, respectively. According to the optimal critical value of Lp (a) (0.25 g/L), patients were divided into the low Lp (a) group (≤ 0.25 g/L) (57 cases) and the high Lp (a) group (>0.25 g/L) (30 cases). The proportion of patients with lactate dehydrogenase level >227 U/L, Ann Arbor stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, and extranodal organ involvement >1 in the high Lp (a) group was higher than that in the low Lp (a) group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Cox multivariate analysis results showed that Ann Arbor stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, international prognostic index (IPI) score 3-5, and Lp (a)>0.25 g/L were independent risk factors for OS in DLBCL patients (all P < 0.05); Ann Arbor stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ and IPI score 3-5 were independent risk factors for RFS in DLBCL patients (all P < 0.05). The median OS in the low Lp (a) group was not reached; the median OS of the high Lp (a) group was 21 months, and there was a statistically significant difference in OS between the two groups ( P = 0.001). The median RFS time was not reached in the low Lp (a) group and the high Lp (a) group; and there was no statistically significant difference in RFS between the two groups ( P = 0.102) . Conclusions:Lp(a) level of DLBCL patients is increased, and Lp(a) could be a factor influencing the prognosis of DLBCL.

Correlation between lipoprotein(a)and prognosis in very old patients with acute decompensated chronic heart failure / 中华老年心脑血管病杂志

Objective To analyze the relationship of lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)]with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure(CHF)patients aged over 80 years,and explore the influencing factors for poor prognosis in these patients.Methods A total of 135 over-80-year-old patients with acute de-compensated CHF admitted in Tianjin University Chest Hospital from June 2018 to August 2021 were enrolled in this study.With Lp(a)300 mg/L as the cut-off value,they were divided into higher Lp(a)group(73 cases)and lower Lp(a)group(62 cases).Their baseline clinical data and outcomes after 12 months of follow-up were collected.The primary endpoint was composite end-point including re-hospitalization due to CHF and/or all-cause mortality.Kaplan-Meier survival curve were plotted to compare the survival rates between the two groups.Logistic regression anal-ysis was employed to analyze the risk factors of poor prognosis in these patients.Results The higher Lp(a)group had larger proportion of chronic kidney disease and higher levels of homocys-teine,total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol than the lower Lp(a)group(P＜0.05).Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the lower group obtained significantly longer 1-year survival time without primary endpoint events than the higher group[9.8 months(95％CI:8.884-10.665)vs 8.2 months(95％CI:7.057-9.272),P＜0.05].Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that Lp(a)≥300 mg/L(OR=2.841,95％CI:1.133-7.092,P=0.026),female(OR=2.809,95％CI:1.111-7.092,P=0.029)and use of diuretic(OR=4.631,95％CI:1.103-19.443,P=0.036)were independent risk factors for primary endpoint events within 1 year.Con-clusion Lp(a)≥300 mg/L is an independent risk factor for re-hospitalization due to CHF and/or all-cause mortality in elderly CHF patients within 1 year after discharge.

The Mechanisms of PCSK9 Inhibitor Reducing Lipoprotein(a) / 生物化学与生物物理进展

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a complex circulating lipoprotein, and increasing evidence has demonstrated its role as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and as a possible therapeutic target. Proprotein converting enzyme proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor significantly decreases the circulating level of Lp(a) and reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. Based on the research results in recent years, this review will systematically summarize the relevant mechanisms of PCSK9 inhibitor reducing Lp(a) synthesis and promoting its degradation. The mechanisms are influenced by whether statins used in combination and baseline levels of Lp(a). PCSK9 inhibitors decrease Lp(a) levels mainly by reducing Lp(a) synthesis. However, the importance of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) mediated enhancing Lp(a) degradation gradually increases when the LDL level decreases. Meanwhile, many other receptor pathways may also exist, including very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor, LDL receptor-related protein 1, CD36, toll-like receptor 2, scavenger receptor B1 and plasminogen receptor. At present, further studies are still needed to explore the mechanisms by which PCSK9 inhibitors reduce Lp(a) level, such as inhibition of Lp(a) synthesis and intracellular assembly, and LDLR-mediated Lp(a) degradation. In addition, whether the reduction of Lp(a) level by PCSK9 inhibitor is related to age, gender and race and whether the dose-effect relationship of reducing Lp(a) is influenced by background lipid level, all of which require in-depth exploration. In short, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of Lp(a) synthesis and degradation is not completely clear. It is worth carrying out relevant research to provide a theoretical basis for better clinical application of such drugs.

Limitaciones de los puntajes de riesgo cardiovascular en prevención primaria. ¿Una oportunidad para los moduladores de riesgo? / Limitations of cardiovascular risk scores in primary prevention. An opportunity for risk modulators?

RESUMEN Introducción : Los puntajes de riesgo cardiovascular tienen limitaciones relacionadas con la calibración, la discriminación y la baja sensibilidad. Se han identificado diferentes "moduladores de riesgo" que permiten mejorar la estratificación del riesgo cardiovascular: placa aterosclerótica carotídea (PAC), puntaje de calcio arterial coronario (pCAC) y lipoproteína(a) [Lp(a)]. Objetivos : 1) determinar la prevalencia de los moduladores de riesgo citados en una población en prevención primaria; 2) determinar la concordancia entre los 2 métodos de detección de aterosclerosis subclínica; 3) establecer qué proporción de pacientes deberían recibir estatinas inicialmente, según su puntaje de riesgo, y posteriormente con el conocimiento de los moduladores de riesgo. Material y métodos : Se incluyeron individuos de 18 a 79 años, que asistieron para una evaluación de riesgo cardiovascular y que no estaban recibiendo tratamiento hipolipemiante. Se calculó el puntaje de riesgo (ASCVD Risk Estimator) en cada paciente. Se evaluó la presencia de PAC, el pCAC y el nivel plasmático de Lp(a). Resultados : Se incluyeron 348 pacientes (edad media 55,6 ± 12,2 años, 45,4% hombres). En la población total, 29,8%, 36,8% y 53,2% de los pacientes mostraron un valor de Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL, PAC o un pCAC > 0, respectivamente. La prevalencia de PAC y pCAC fue progresivamente mayor según la categoría de riesgo cardiovascular; sin embargo, la proporción de sujetos de bajo riesgo que tenían moduladores de riesgo fue considerable (Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl: 25,7%; PAC: 22%; pCAC > 0: 33%). En los 60 individuos menores de 45 años la prevalencia de pCAC > 0 y PAC fue de 18,3% y 10%, respectivamente. La concordancia entre los dos métodos para determinar la presencia de ateromatosis subclínica fue discreta (kappa 0,33). La indicación del tratamiento con estatinas aumentó un 31,6% luego de evaluar la presencia de moduladores. Conclusión : La presencia de moduladores de riesgo fue frecuente en esta población en prevención primaria, incluso en sujetos de bajo riesgo o menores de 45 años. La detección de moduladores de riesgo podría mejorar la estratificación inicial y llevar a reconsiderar el tratamiento con estatinas.

ABSTRACT Background : Cardiovascular risk scores have limitations related to calibration, discrimination, and low sensitivity. Different "risk modulators" have been identified to improve cardiovascular risk stratification: carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP), coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Objectives : The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the prevalence of risk modulators mentioned in a primary prevention population; 2) determine the concordance between the 2 methods of detecting subclinical atherosclerosis; and 3) establish which proportion of patients should receive statins according to the initial risk stratification and after being recategorized by screening for risk modulators. Methods : Individuals aged 18 to 79 years who consulted for cardiovascular risk assessment and who were not receiving lipid-lowering treatment were included. The risk score was calculated in each patient using ASCVD Risk Estimator. The presence of CAP, CAC score and Lp(a) level were evaluated. Results : The cohort was made up of 348 patients; mean age was 55.6 ± 12.2 years and 45.4% were men. In the total population, 29.8%, 36.8%, and 53.2% of patients showed Lp(a) value ≥50 mg/dL, CAP, or a CAC score >0, respectively. The prevalence of CAP and CAC score was progressively higher according to the cardiovascular risk category; however, the proportion of low-risk subjects who had risk modulators was considerable (Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl: 25.7%; CAP: 22%; CAC score >0: 33%). In the 60 subjects <45 years, the prevalence of CAC score >0 and CAP was 18.3% and 10%, respectively. The agreement between the two methods for quantifying subclinical atheromatosis was fair (kappa= 0.33). The indication for statin treatment increased by 31.6% after evaluating the presence of modulators. Conclusion : The presence of risk modulators was common in this population in primary prevention, even in low-risk subjects or < 45 years. Detection of risk modulators could improve initial stratification and lead to reconsideration of statin treatment.

The Relationship between Basal Serum Lipoprotein(a) Levels and the Pulmonary Artery to Ascending Aorta Ratio in COVID-19 Survivors

Abstract Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can cause permanent damage to vascular structures by directly or indirectly affecting the cardiopulmonary system. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an important identified risk factor for vascular endothelial cell dysfunction. Objective: The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between Lp(a) levels measured at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and the pulmonary artery (PA) to the ascending aorta (Ao) ratio (PA:Ao ratio) in survivors evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods: The study sample consisted of 100 patients who recovered from COVID-19 in the past 3 to 6 months. The relationship between the change in the PA:Ao ratio (ΔPA:Ao) and the Lp(a) levels measured at the time of diagnosis was evaluated. Diameter measurements at baseline and follow-up were evaluated with TTE. Results: A significant increase was found in PA, Ao, and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness in TTE (p< 0.001 for all). There was a weak correlation between D-dimer and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measured at the time of diagnosis and ΔPA:Ao and ΔEAT in survivors. However, a positive and strong correlation was observed between Lp(a) levels and ΔPa:Ao (r = 0.628, p< 0.001) and ΔEAT (r = 0.633, p< 0.001). Conclusion: There may be dysfunction in vascular structures due to COVID-19. For the first time in the literature, a strong correlation was shown between the Lp(a) levels measured at the time of diagnosis and ΔPA:Ao and ΔEAT values in patients with COVID-19.

Research progress of lipoprotein a in cardiovascular diseases / 重庆医学

Lipoprotein a[Lp(a)]is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.This paper summarizes the structure,anabolism and mechanism of action of Lp(a),and the relationship between Lp(a)and cardiovascular diseases,liver and kidney diseases,diabetes mellitus and other diseases.It focuses on the traditional lipid-low-ering regimen to reduce plasma Lp(a)level and the current popular novel therapies,such as mipomersen,pel-acarsen,olpasiran,and the interfering effect of related drugs on Lp(a)level and the degree of benefit on cardi-ovascular events.How to reduce plasma Lp(a)level and improve patient prognosis will be the key to future Lp(a)related research.

Diagnostic value of LP(a),D-D combined LAD for LATH in atrial fibrillation / 心血管康复医学杂志

Objective:To study diagnostic value of left atrial diameter(LAD),lipoprotein(a)[LP(a)]combined D-dimer(D-D)for left atrial thrombus(LATH)in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF).Methods:According to results of transesophageal echocardiography,a total of 367 AF patients treated in our hospital were divided into LATH group(n=67)and no LATH group(n=300).General clinical data,LAD,serum Lp(a)level and positive D-D rate were compared between two groups,and diagnostic value of above indexes for LATH in AF was ana-lyzed.Results:Compared with no LATH group,there were significant rise in LAD[(40.93±4.69)mm vs.(44.65±4.31)mm],serum Lp(a)level[(17.05±2.31)mg/dl vs.(27.42±3.06)mg/dl]and positive D-D rate(5.67%vs.22.34%)in LATH group(P=0.001 all).ROC curve indicated that AUC of Lp(a),positive D-D,LAD single detection and triple combined detection diagnosing LATH in AF was 0.711,0.584,0.728 and 0.801 respectively;sensitivity was 43.28%,22.39%,64.18%and 65.67%respectively;and specificity was 92.00%,94.33%,76.67%and 80.67%respectively.AUC of triple combined detection was significantly higher than that of any single detection,and sensitivity and specificity were significantly higher than those of Lp(a)and positive D-D single detection(P＜0.05 or＜0.01).Conclusion:Combined detection of Lp(a),positive D-D and LAD possess high diagnostic value for left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation.

Analysis of lipoprotein(a) level and related factors in healthy Tajik and Kazak adults in Xinjiang / 中华检验医学杂志

Objective:To investigate the distribution and related factors of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level in healthy Tajik and Kazak adults in China.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to October 2021 and March to June 2022, and blood samples were collected from 2, 637 healthy Tajik adults [1 010 men, average age: (40.08±14.74) years; 1 627 women, average age: (38.27±12.90) years] in Tashkurgan Tajik Autonomous County and 1 911 healthy Kazak adults [720 men, average age: (42.10±12.26) years; 1 191 women, average age: (38.27±12.90) years] in Fuyun County of Xinjiang. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), creatinine (Cr), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and Lp(a) were measured. The distribution of Lp(a) levels in different sex and age groups was compared. The Lp(a) level of Tajik and Kazakh ethnic groups was compared by Mann-Whitney U test, and correlation factors of Lp(a) level were analyzed by multiple logistic regression. Results:The distribution of Lp(a) level in Tajik and Kazak population was skewed. Lp(a) levels of Tajik and Kazak ranged from the lowest 0.40 mg/L and 0.62 mg/L to the highest 1 229.40 mg/L and 2 108.58 mg/L, respectively, and the median Lp(a) level was 78.90 (38.60, 190.20) mg/L and 103.30 (49.57, 234.27) mg/L, respectively. Median Lp(a) level of Kazak was significantly higher than that of Tjik ( P<0.001). The median Lp(a) levels of Tajik males and females were similar: 77.45 (39.80, 187.10) mg/L and 79.90 (38.60, 192.30) mg/L ( P=0.948). The median Lp(a) levels of Kazakh males and females were also similar: 109.42 (50.49, 230.38) mg/L and 99.01 (49.11, 237.25) mg/L, respectively ( P=0.578). After pooling the data of Tajik and Kazak and adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, blood pressure, blood glucose and other factors, Lp(a) level was correlated with ethnic (standard partial regression coefficient 0.066, P=0.008) and LDL-C level (standard partial regression coefficient 0.136, P<0.001). Conclusions:Lp(a) level in healthy Tajik and Kazak adults varied greatly among individuals, and Kazak residents had a higher Lp(a) level than Tajik residents. There was no significant sex difference in Lp(a) level among Tajik and Kazakh, and LDL-C and ethnicity are independent factors related to Lp(a) level.

Correlation between serum lipoprotein (a) and the severity of white matter hyperintensities in middle-aged and elderly people in the community / 国际脑血管病杂志

Objective:To investigate the correlation between serum lipoprotein (a) [LP(a)] and the severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in the middle-aged and elderly people in the community.Methods:Consecutive middle-aged and elderly residents residing in the community underwent physical examinations in the Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2016 to August 2021 were retrospectively collected. Fasting venous blood was collected on the next day of admission to detect the level of Lp(a). During hospitalization, cranial MRI examination was performed and the severity of WMHs was graded using the Fazekas visual scoring method. Ordinal multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent related factors for the severity of WMHs.Results:A total of 1 752 patients were included in the analysis. There were 969 males (55.31%) and 783 females (44.69%). Their age was 66.18±10.32 years old. There were 1 167 patients (66.61%) in the mild WMHs group, 407 (23.23%) in the moderate WMHs group, and 178 (10.16%) in the severe WMHs group. Ordinal multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that after adjusting for confounding factors, a higher serum Lp(a) level was independently related to the severity of WMHs (with the first quartile as a reference, the third quartile: odds ratio 1.441, 95% confidence interval 1.050-1.976, P=0.023; the fourth quartile: odds ratio 1.717, 95% confidence interval 1.252-2.354, P=0.001). Conclusion:Serum Lp(a) is independently correlated with the severity of WMHs.

Correlation of lipoprotein (a) levels and plaque morphology in very young acute coronary syndrome patients using optical coherence tomography

Introduction: Levels of lipoprotein (LP) (a) are useful marker for risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. This genetic biomarker is suggestive of patient predisposition to acute coronary event. The present study was to study correlation of LP(a) levels and plaque morphology in very young patients (<35 years) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A prospective, single-center, observational study consisting of very young patients with ACS and fit for optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided invasive coronary angiography was conducted at tertiary-care centre. LP(a) levels were compared between healthy controls and very young ACS patients. Correlation of LP(a) levels and plaque characteristics in very young ACS patients was done using OCT imaging. Results: Out of enrolled 80 subjects, 40 were very young ACS and 40 were matched healthy controls. In very young patients, plaque rupture and erosion were mechanism of ACS in 67.5% and 32.5% patients, respectively. Mean levels of LP(a) were 28.10 ± 13.96 nmol/l in healthy controls and 47.19 ± 29.85 nmol/l in very young patients with ACS (p ¼ 0.022). Among very young ACS patients, patients with LP(a) levels<75 nmol/l and 75 nmol/l had mean thin cap fibroatheroma thickness of 117.08 ± 52.542 mm and 95.00 ± 36.286 mm, respectively (p ¼ 0.2355). Conclusion: Higher levels of LP(a) were seen in younger patients with ACS compared with matched healthy individuals. Plaque rupture was the commonest mechanism of ACS in very young ACS patients. Patients with high LP(a) levels had lesser thickness of fibrous cap in OCT imaging compared with low levels of LP(a).

Niveles elevados de lipoproteína (a) y riesgo de eventos clínicos relacionados con la estenosis valvular aórtica: una revisión sistemática / High Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Risk of Aortic Valve Stenosis Related Clinical Events: A Systematic Review

RESUMEN Introducción: Varios estudios han evaluado la asociación entre los niveles plasmáticos de lipoproteína (a) [Lp(a)] y la aparición de eventos relacionados con la estenosis valvular aórtica, aunque los resultados fueron contradictorios. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión fue analizar la capacidad predictiva de los niveles elevados de Lp(a) sobre los eventos clínicos relacionados con la estenosis valvular aórtica. Material y métodos: Esta revisión sistemática se realizó de acuerdo con las recomendaciones PRISMA y STROBE. Se realizó una búsqueda en diferentes bases de datos con el objetivo de identificar estudios de cohorte que evaluaran la asociación entre los niveles de Lp(a) y los eventos de interés. El punto final primario fue la incidencia de eventos clínicos relacionados con la estenosis aórtica (reemplazo valvular aórtico, muerte u hospitalización). Esta revisión fue registrada en PROSPERO. Resultados: Se consideraron elegibles para el análisis siete estudios observacionales con un total de 58 783 pacientes. Los valores elevados de Lp(a) se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de eventos relacionados con la estenosis valvular aórtica en la mayoría de los estudios evaluados (entre un 70% y aproximadamente 3 veces más riesgo), a pesar de ajustar por otros factores de riesgo. Conclusión: Esta revisión sugiere que los niveles elevados de Lp(a) se asocian con una mayor incidencia de eventos clínicos relacionados con la estenosis valvular aórtica. Sin embargo, y considerando las limitaciones de este estudio, la utilidad clínica de la Lp(a) como marcador pronóstico en la enfermedad valvular aórtica deberá confirmarse en futuras investigaciones.

ABSTRACT Background: Several studies have evaluated the association between lipoprotein(a) plasma levels [Lp(a)] and the occurrence of aortic valve stenosis related events, with contradictory results. Objective: The main objective of this systematic review was to analyze the predictive capacity of elevated Lp(a) levels on major clinical events associated with aortic valve stenosis. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and STROBE recommendations. A search was carried out in order to identify studies with a cohort design evaluating the association between Lp(a) levels and the events of interest. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinical events related with aortic valve stenosis (aortic valve replacement, death or hospitalization). This review was registered in PROSPERO. Results: Seven observational studies with a total of 58 783 patients were eligible for analysis. Our findings showed that the presence of elevated Lp(a) levels was associated with an increased risk of events related with aortic valve stenosis in most of the studies evaluated (between 70% and approximately 3-fold higher risk), despite adjusting for other risk factors. Conclusion: This review suggests that elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with a higher incidence of aortic valve stenosis related clinical events. However, considering the limitations of this study, the clinical usefulness of Lp(a) as a prognostic marker in aortic valve disease should be confirmed in future investigations.

Infarto agudo de miocardio en paciente con bajo riesgo cardiovascular y lipoproteína (a) elevada. Reporte de caso / Acute myocardial infarction in a patient with low cardiovascular risk and elevated lipoprotein (a). Case report

RESUMEN La lipoproteína (a) (Lp (a)) es un complejo proteico lipídico plasmático, que representa un factor de riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV). Sin embargo, no se incluye la medición de Lp (a) en el perfil lipídico convencional y tampoco existen terapias específicas aprobadas para reducir sustancialmente las concentraciones de Lp (a). Se reporta el caso de un varón de 49 años con una estimación de bajo riesgo cardiovascular quien desarrolló infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) con elevación de ST probablemente debido a elevación de Lp (a). Se presenta el caso para destacar la importancia de la detección y análisis de la Lp (a) en la evaluación del riesgo cardiovascular. Además, se describen terapias actuales y emergentes en pacientes con Lp (a) elevada.

SUMMARY Lipoprotein(a) (Lp (a)) is a plasmatic lipid protein complex, which represents a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, conventional lipid assays are unable to measure or estimate Lp (a) and there are no specific therapies approved to substantially reduce Lp (a) concentrations. We report the case of a 49-year-old man with low cardiovascular risk who developed an acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation probably due to elevation of Lp (a) is reported. The purpose of this case report is to highlight the detection and analysis of Lp (a) in the assessment of cardiovascular risk. In addition, current and emerging therapies are described in patients with elevated Lp (a).

Lipoprotein (A) biomarkers for clinical practice / Монголын Анагаах Ухаан

@#A lot of factors can cause coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke including external risk factors such as tobacco, alcohol consumption, decreased physical activity, obesity while arterial maintenance, high blood sugar, increased LDL are internal risk factors. We can reduce our external risk factors by changing our lifestyle. Recent studies have shown increased blood Lp(a) levels are independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. After 1987, the number of publications has increased since the cDNA homology sequence of Lp(a) and plasminogen 2 was identified. Lp(a) is protein complex consisting from apolipoprotein, phospholipid, free cholesterol, cholesterol esters and tryglyceride. Apoliprotein is a lipid that binds with lipoprotein. Lipoproteins have water-soluble and fat-soluble parts, and those parts bind to lipids and are transported in the bloodstream.How is elevated Lp(a) a risk factor for cardiovascular disease? How much does lowering Lp(a) reduce CVD risk factors? If high Lp(a) concentrations are present, mitigation measures are outlined below.

Relationship between lipoprotein (a) and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals

Abstract Background: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between Lipoprotein (a) ‒ Lp(a) levels and carotid Intima-Media Thickness (cIMT) and with carotid plaques in healthy subjects because of previous contradictory data. Methods: A total of 317 healthy normolipidemic subjects (20‒77 years old) were selected. The cIMT and atherosclerotic plaques were determined by B-mode ultrasonography. Mann-Whitney tests were performed to compare the groups according to Lp(a) levels and to explore the associations between Lp(a), carotid plaques, and cIMT, logistic and linear regression analyses were performed. Results: Studied population (51% females, median age 43 years old) presented carotid plaques and cIMT ≥ 0.9 mm in 23% and 18% of the participants, respectively. The group with Lp(a) levels > 30 mg/dL presented significantly higher age and atherosclerotic plaques. Indeed, multivariate linear regression analysis showed a significant association between Lp(a), age, and race. On the other hand, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the subjects with Lp(a) > 30 mg/dL have a significantly high risk of carotid plaques. Conclusion: The data from the present study indicate that Lp(a) levels above 30 mg/dL contribute to the development of carotid plaques even in apparently healthy participants.

Síndrome metabólico, lipoproteína(a) y aterosclerosis subclínica en población mexicana / Metabolic syndrome, lipoprotein(a) and subclinical atherosclerosis in Mexican population

Resumen Objetivo: Investigar la asociación del síndrome metabólico y la lipoproteína(a) [Lp(a)] con el riesgo de aterosclerosis subclínica en adultos mexicanos. Método: En 953 mujeres y hombres se evaluaron datos clínicos, bioquímicos y tomográficos de grasa abdominal visceral, subcutánea, hepática y calcio arterial coronario. La Lp(a) se determinó mediante nefelometría y el síndrome metabólico se diagnosticó con los criterios del Adult Treatment Panel III. La asociación independiente de estas variables con el calcio arterial coronario se obtuvo con análisis de regresión logística multivariada. Resultados: La edad, el peso, el índice de masa corporal, la presión arterial sistólica y diastólica, los volúmenes de grasa abdominal, los lípidos, la glucosa, la insulina y el índice de resistencia a insulina fueron significativamente mayores en los sujetos con síndrome metabólico, mientras que la mediana de Lp(a) fue más baja en comparación con los sujetos sin el síndrome (3.7 [rango intercuartílico (RIC): 2.3-9.2 vs. 5.9 [RIC: 2.5-13.1) mg/dl; p < 0.01). El número de componentes y el síndrome metabólico se asociaron inversamente con la Lp(a) elevada (> 30 mg/dl). La presencia de síndrome metabólico se asoció con un riesgo de calcio arterial coronario > 0 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.19; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1.64-2.94; p < 0.001), independientemente de la Lp(a) elevada. La glucemia > 100 mg/dl (OR: 2.42; IC95%: 1.7-3.4; p < 0.0001) y la presión arterial elevada (OR: 2.14; IC95%: 1.5-3.1; p > 0.0001) se asociaron con calcio arterial coronario > 0. Conclusiones: En población mexicana existe una asociación inversa entre la concentración de Lp(a) y el síndrome metabólico. Este y sus componentes se asociaron positivamente con aterosclerosis subclínica. La elevada prevalencia de obesidad, diabetes, hipertensión arterial, triglicéridos elevados y concentración de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de alta densidad que caracterizan a la población mexicana pudieran explicar las diferencias con otras poblaciones.

Abstract Objective: To assess the relationship of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and Lp(a) with subclinical atherosclerosis (CAC) in Mexican adults. Method: Clinical, biochemical and tomographic data of visceral, subcutaneous, hepatic abdominal fat and CAC were evaluated in 953 women and men. Lp(a) was determined by nephelometry and MetS was diagnosed according to ATP III criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent association of these variables with CAC. Results: Age, weight, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, volumes of visceral, subcutaneous and hepatic abdominal fat, lipids, glucose, insulin and HOMA-RI were significantly higher in subjects with MetS. The median Lp(a) was lower in subjects with MetS compared to subjects without MetS (3.7 [IR: 2.3-9.2 vs. 5.9 [IR: 2.5-13.1) mg/dL; p < 0.01). The number of components and the MetS were inversely associated with the elevated Lp(a) (> 30 mg / dL). The presence of MetS was associated with a CAC risk >0 (OR: 2.19, [95% CI (1.64-2.94)]; p < 0.001), independently of elevated Lp(a). The components of MetS that were independently associated with the presence of CAC > 0 UA were glycaemia > 100 mg/dL (OR 2.42, [95% CI (1.7-3.4)]; p < 0.0001) and high blood pressure (OR 2.14 [95% CI (1.5-3.1)]; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In Mexican population there is an inverse association between Lp(a) levels and MetS. The MetS and its components were associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. The high prevalence of obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure high triglycerides and low HDL-C, characteristics of Mexican population could explain the differences with other populations.

Correlation between fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a) and early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes / 国际脑血管病杂志

Objective:To investigate the correlation between fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a) and early neurological deterioration (END) in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes.Methods:From January 2017 to December 2020, patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University within 48 h of onset were enrolled retrospectively. END was defined as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score within 7 d after onset increased by ≥2 or motor function score increased by ≥1 compared with the baseline. Demographic and baseline clinical data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for END in general and diabetic patients with acute ischemic stroke. Results:A total of 1 504 patients with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Two hundred and fifty-two (16.76%) patients had END. The age, baseline NIHSS score, random blood glucose, fibrinogen, lipoprotein (a) levels, and the proportion of patients with diabetes in the END group were higher than those in the non-END group. There were also significant differences in various stroke etiologic subtypes between the END group and the non-END group (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a) levels were not the independent risk factors for END in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Three hundred and thirty-seven patients also had diabetes mellitus, of which 85 had END (25.22%). The levels of fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a) in the END group were significantly higher than those in the non-END group ( P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fibrinogen (odds ratio 2.23, 95% confidence interval 1.75-4.54; P=0.002) and lipoprotein (a) (odds ratio 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.57-3.65; P=0.003) were the independent risk factors for END in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes. Conclusion:Higher fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a) levels are associated with END in acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes.

Comparison of the difference between serum lipoprotein(a) particle concentration and mass concentration in patients with chronic kidney disease / 中华检验医学杂志

Objective:To compare the difference between serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] particle concentration and mass concentration in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and healthy controls, and to analyze the concentration distribution of the deviations between the two measurement methods.Methods:Serum Lp(a) particle concentration and mass concentration were respectively detected in 196 patients with CKD and 97 healthy controls from Eastern Theater General Hospital during June 2018 to December 2019. The upper limit of reference value for Lp(a) particle concentration was set as 75 nmol/L and the upper limit of reference value for mass concentration was set as 300 mg/L, the difference on the positive rates of Lp(a) particle concentration and mass concentration in each group were compared. According to the quartile of Lp(a) concentration in patients with CKD, the patients were divided into 4 groups, and the results derived from the two methods were compared among groups.Results:Serum Lp(a) particle concentration (25.7 [10.5, 75.4] nmol/L vs 19.2[8.1-50.2] nmol/L, P=0.021) and mass concentration (157[64, 432] mg/L vs 127[50-274] mg/L, P=0.023) were significantly higher in patients with CKD than those in healthy controls. The positive rate of Lp(a) particle concentration was significantly lower than that of mass concentration (25.0%[48/196] vs 37.2%[73/196], P=0.009) in CKD patients. The positive rate of Lp(a) particle concentration and mass concentration was similar in healthy controls (18.6%[18/97] vs 22.7%[22/97], P=0.478). The overestimation rate of Lp(a) mass concentration in CKD patients was significantly higher than that in healthy controls (12.8%[25/196] vs 4.1%[4/97], P=0.020). Lp(a) mass concentration of group Ⅲ in CKD patients was between 157.00-432.25 mg/L, the positive rate of Lp(a) particle concentration was significantly lower than that of mass concentration (4.1%[2/49] vs 49%[24/49], P<0.001), and the overestimation rate (44.9%[22/49]) of Lp(a) mass concentration in this group was also the highest (all P<0.001). According to the conversion factor provided by the reagent manual of Lp(a) particle concentration, the test results were converted into mass concentration. The actual mass concentration of Lp(a) in CKD patients grouped by quartile was significantly higher than that after Lp(a) particle concentration conversion (all P<0.05). Conclusions:The positive rate of serum Lp(a) particle concentration is significantly lower than that of mass concentration in CKD patients and the obvious overestimation deviation of Lp(a) mass concentration is observed in this analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Serum Lipoprotein (a) in Hypothyroid and Healthy Subjects

This study is taken up to estimate and compare the level of serum Lp(a) in hypothyroid patients and in healthy controls. A total of 50 hypothyroidpatients within aged group 20-60 years and total of 50 healthy controls within 20-60 years were enrolled in the study after taking written consent. Thyroid profile and Lp(a) were measured by CLIA and immune turbidemetric method respectively. Data collected was analysed using Stata version 14.1 software. Result shows an increased level of Lp(a) among hypothyroid patients when compared to healthy controls