Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 821-823, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-621018

RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate the effective and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous portal vein guide wire placement adjunct to thrombolytic catheter,which treating portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation.Methods From Jan 2012 to Dec 2015,a total of 6 patients (5 male,1 female,average age 50.6 years old,age range 41-65 years old) with portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation were retrospectively studied.The diagnosis was confirmed by contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with hypoechonic and no enhancement in portal vein.With ultrasound-guided a 18-guage guide wire was placed in right branch of portal vein,and a guidewire was placement.After exchanging the catheter,the thrombosis was confirmed again by venography.A thrombolytic catheter was placed and local thrombolysis therapy was performed.Results The guidewires were successfully placed in 6 patients.The thrombolytic catheters were successfully placed in 5 patients (day 2-60 after operation),and failed in 1 patient (9 years after operation).With 5-11 days urokinase injection,the patency of portal vein was found in 5 patients,of which 4 patients was treated by angioplasty and stent placement.With 16-31 months follow-up,the patency of portal vein was maintained.Neither server complication nor related-death was occurred.Conclusions Ultrasound-guided percutaneous portal vein guide wire placement adjuncts thrombolytic catheter is effective and safety for treating portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation.

2.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 1194-1196, 2009.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-392807

RESUMEN

Objective To improve the treat effect of the orthotopic liver transplantation patients with severe sepsis. Methods Fif-ty-six post-surgery patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. One was non-OLT group (A group) and the other was OLT group (B group). Besides general data, the surveillance of blood lactate, the number of failure organs, APACHE Ⅱand MODS were recorded. 28-days survival rate and follow-up were checked. Results The mortality of hospitalization in non-OLT group was 30% and 57.6% in OLT group. The level of blood lactate in OLT group at the 1 st day increased significantly, which was statistically differ-ent with that in non-OLT group (P <0.01). It decreased but kept higher than that in non-group in following seven days. The numbers of failure organs in OLT group were more than in non-OLT group (P <0.01). The continuous APACHE Ⅱ score had no significant difference between two groups. But the continuous MODS score in OLT group was higher than in non-OLT group (P <0.01). Conclusions The 28-days mortality of OLT with severe sepsis is almost two times as much as that of non-OLT. It should cause more attention. The OLT with se-vere sepsis is more likely suffered from failure organs and difficult to recovery. To assess the condition of failure organs in OLT patients with severe sepsis, MODS score is better than APACHE Ⅱ score in this study. It is suggested that the standard of score system could be improved or come up with new score for organ transplantation. It will be better if blood lactate score is included.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA