Outcome evaluation of introducing the Japanese version of the Liverpool Care Pathway for patients with cancer in a general ward

This study sought to determine whether the Japanese version of the Liverpool Care Pathway （LCP-J） could improve nurses’ practice in dying-phase and difficulties with palliative care in a general ward. Between July 2014 and June 2015, LCP-J intervention and educational program for nurse were introduced in a general ward. The primary aims of this study were to clarify the changes in self-reported practice and difficulties of nurse before and after the interventions. Self-reported practice and difficulties were measured using Palliative Care Self-Reported Practice Scale （PCPS） and Palliative Care Difficulty Scale （PCDS）, respectively. The secondary aim was to clarify the defference in treatment, care and examination within last 48 hours between LCP-J patients and non-LCP-J patients. We obtained 21 responses in pre-intervention and 22 responses in post-intervention surveys from eligible nurses. Significant improvements were noted on domain of dying-phase care in PCPS and domain of alleviation of symptom in PCDS （3.00±1.16 versus 3.52±0.61 [p=0.042], 3.56±0.78 versus 3.10±0.63 [p=0.015], respectively）. LCP-J was used for 9 dying cancer patients （40%）, and no significant difference in treatment and examination within last 48 hours between LCP-J patients and non-LCP-J patients. LCP-J in general ward may improve nurses’ practice in dying-phase and difficulties with alleviation of symptom. In addition, considering the burden of LCP-J, to develop a useful checklist and educational interventions for dying patients is promising.

The burden of introducing the Japanese language version of the Liverpool Care Pathway（LCP-J）for dying patients in general wards and their families：experience of health care professionals in a university hospital

The purpose of this study was to explore the burden of introducing LCP-J in two wards（medical oncology and respiratory medicine）in Tohoku University Hospital. We administered audit evaluations about dying cancer patients and interviewed 2 doctors and 8 nurses regarding LCP-J intervention. LCP-J was used for 22 patients（38％）, and no significant difference in infusion, potent opioid analgesic and sedative medication within last 48 hours were seen between users and nonusers. Responses were categorized into［confirm directions about dying care among health care professionals］, and［training in dying care in a structured way］as usefulness facets of the LCP-J, and［difficulty in assessment of dying］,［burden of health care professionals］, and［difficulty using LCP-J without knowledge and training in dying care］as burdens of the LCP-J. We explored the burden of LCP-J in general wards, and found that use of the LCP-J could need education in dying care and backup of the palliative care team.

Development and Feasibility of the Japanese language version Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient－Home

<b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to develop the Japanese language version of the Liverpool Care Pathway － Home (LCP－H), and to examine the feasibility of the LCP－H in a pilot study. <b>Methods:</b> LCP－H was administered to cancer patients who were predicted to be in their last few days. We evaluated the achieved care goals of LCP－H. A cross－sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to home nurses who used LCP－H to evaluate usefulness in using LCP－H. <b>Results:</b> LCP－H was used to 35 patients. The care goals of LCP－H were achieved in almost 80%. The nurses evaluated the usefulness of LCP－H: Providing to continuous end－of－life care each staff, Communication well between home nurses and co－medical home staff, and Education for home nurses with limited experience with end－of－life care. <b>Conclusion:</b> The feasibility of LCP－H was confirmed. Therefore, LCP－H should help home nurses to care for dying patients and their families as guide for end－of－life care in home, and improve the quality of end－of－life care in home. However, because the LCP is now being phased out in the UK, it may be necessary to develop an original education tool to assist in care for dying patients and their families in Japan.

A retrospective study between use and not－use of the Japanese version of the Liverpool Care Pathway

<b>Purpose:</b> To investigate the indications for use of the Japanese version of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), we evaluated the conditions of patients using and those not using the LCP. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 71 LCP patients and 60 non－LCP patients who died in our palliative care unit between March and December 2013. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in patients’ background between the LCP and non－LCP groups. For patients in the non－LCP group, sudden changes in condition were significantly more frequent and deep continuous sedation was used significantly less than in the LCP group. In the LCP group, the average duration on the LCP was 4.0 days, and the beginning criterion was met by three－point or more of all the patients. The initial assessment was achieved except for one case. In the non－LCP group, reasons for not using the LCP were a sudden change in condition (35 patients), a rapid change in medical condition (14), and a risk of falling (4). <b>Conclusions:</b> The LCP met the beginning criterion and was started at suitable time in the LCP group. The LCP is not useful for all patients; it cannot be used for a patient with sudden or rapid changes in condition, or at a risk of falling.

Implementation of Liverpool Care Pathway Japanese version to electronic medical chart (FUJITSU HOPE/EGMAIN-FX®)

Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) Japanese version was implemented to electronic medical chart (FUJITSU HOPE/EGMAIN-FX®). The processes were needed as follows; preparation of each templates (criteria for use of the LCP/initial assessment, ongoing assessment, and care after death), preparation of pathway/regimen, incorporation of the templates to the pathway and approval in our hospital clinical pathway committee. One problem we encountered was whether to choose an Excel or a template format for each assessment sheet, and the template format was selected as it presented us with a higher degree of convenience, since each field can be expanded into a table on the screen without scrolling and there is little limitation in the letters of the valiance records that can be used in the template format. The complexity of the three records, “the pathway”, “SOAP & focus” for recording opioid use, and “the progress sheet” for recording vital signs, in addition to the inability to expand enough to capture the same field and show changes in the daily pathway over time through night and day work shifts remain a challenge and need to be improved in the future.

The significance and possibility of introduction of a Japanese language version of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient: The pilot study in the two palliative care units

<b>Purpose</b>: The Liverpool Care Pathway is a clinical path for the dying patient. In this study, a pilot study of a Japanese language version of the Liverpool Care Pathway Powered by Editorial Manager® and Preprint Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation (henceforth, “LCP”) was carried out in order to investigate the significance of using LCP and the possibility of its introduction. <b>Method</b>: 1. LCP was used on inpatients in the palliative care wards, and the status of the achieved care goal was evaluated. 2. A questionnaire survey regarding the usefulness of LCP was conducted on the nursing staff of the study facility. <b>Results</b>: The care goal indicated by LCP were achieved in 80% or more of the patients and families. The nursing staff members were asked to evaluate of LCP was evaluated the usefulness of LCP in confirming that the patient is in the dying phase, reviewing end-of-life care, continuous integrated care giving, and education for nurses with limited experience with end-of-life care. <b>Conclusion</b>: The high degree of achievement of the care goal in LCP shows concordance between LCP and end-of-life care at the study facility, and shows that it is possible for LCP to be introduced as an index of clinical pathway for end-of-life care giving. In addition, the nurses' evaluations imply the significance of LCP in reinforcement and education with regard to end-of-life care giving.