Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Chinese Journal of Trauma ; (12): 427-434, 2023.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-992619

RESUMEN

Objective:To compare the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of osteoporotic lumbar compression fracture (OLCF) via the approach through midpoint transverse process-transition zone of articular process and the unilateral transpedicular approach.Methods:A prospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 794 patients with OLCF treated in Honghui Hospital affiliated to Xi′an Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 2017 to December 2019. The patients were divided into transitional-zone puncture group (400 patients, 400 vertebrae) and pedicle puncture group (394 patients, 394 vertebrae) according to the envelope method. The transitional-zone puncture group was treated with PVP via the approach through midpoint transverse process-transition zone of articular process, and the pedicle puncture group was treated with PVP via the unilateral transpedicular approach. The operation time and radiation dose were documented. The visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) were evaluated before operation and at 1 day, 3 months, 1 year after operation. The cement distribution and the incidence of complications such as cement leakage, re-fracture of the injured vertebra, spinal cord nerve injury and facet joint injury were detected.Results:The patients were composed of 270 males and 524 females, at the age of 68.9-78.5 years [(73.7±4.8)years]. All patients were followed up for 12-14 months [(13.4±0.8)months]. The operation time and radiation dose in transitional-zone puncture group were reduced compared with pedicle puncture group ( P<0.01). There was no significant difference in VAS and ODI between the two groups before operation (all P>0.05). The VAS between transitional-zone puncture group [(2.1±0.9)points, (2.3±1.1)points, (2.7±1.3)points] and pedicle puncture group [(2.3±0.7)points, (2.5±0.9)points, (2.9±1.1)points] was obviously reduced from that before operation (all P<0.01), significantly different at 1 day, 3 months, 1 year after operation ( P<0.05 or 0.01). The ODI between transitional-zone puncture group (14.3±1.8, 13.6±3.4, 11.3±4.4) and pedicle puncture group (25.5±5.7, 20.7±6.3, 20.6±6.9) was significantly different at 1 day, 3 months, 1 year after operation (all P<0.01), and all were obviously reduced from that before operation (all P<0.01). With regard to the cement distribution, the number of bilaterally cemented vertebrae in transitional-zone puncture group (324) was more than that in pedicle puncture group (94) ( P<0.01). The incidence of cement leakage, re-fracture of the injured vertebra and facet joint injury was 8.25%(22/400), 0.00%(0/400) and 3.25%(13/400) in transitional-zone puncture group, significantly different from 20.81%(82/394), 2.03%(8/394) and 9.90%(39/394) in pedicle puncture group ( P<0.05 or 0.01). There was no significant difference in spinal cord nerve injury between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:For OLCF, PVP via the approach through the midpoint transverse process-transition zone of articular process and the unilateral transpedicular approach are both effective, but the former has advantages of shorter operation time, smaller radiation dose, greater dispersion of bone cement and lower incidence of cement leakage, re-fracture of the injured vertebra and facet joint injury.

2.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ; (12): 654-658, 2021.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-888333

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the correction loss after posterior segmental fixation for lumbar spine fractures and explore the related image factors.@*METHODS@#Posterior short-segment fixation was received in 48 patients with L@*RESULTS@#The average follow-up was 12 to 18 (16.13±5.39) months. LKA, AVH and VWA at 1 week postoperative and those at the final follow up, were significantly improved compared with those preoperative (@*CONCLUSION@#The angle of adjacent intervertebral discs and anterior height of injured vertebrae were lost statistically after posterior short-segment pedicle screw treatment for lumbar fractures, and multivariate analysis showed that all of them were correlated with load-sharing score.


Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery ; : 9-17, 2018.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-765597

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of multiple thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures depending on whether the fractures were contiguous. SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: The treatment of multiple spine fractures in patients without osteoporosis has rarely been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2004 to January 2016, 81 patients without osteoporosis who had acute thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures and underwent posterior fusion surgery were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups (group A: contiguous, group B: non-contiguous). We investigated the causes of the injuries, the locations of the injuries within the spine, the range of fusion levels, and functional outcomes based on the patients' general characteristics. RESULTS: Group A comprised 37 patients and group B comprised 44 patients. In most patients, the fusion included 3 segments (group A: 12, group B: 14) or 4 segments (group A: 9, group B: 10). Group A scored 21.2 and group B scored 19.0 on the Korean Oswestry Disability Index. In both groups, longer fusion was associated with poorer clinical results. In the clinical evaluation of the fusion rate, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.446). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with multiple vertebral fractures showed more fusion segments and poor clinical outcomes in contiguous fractures. In the patients with non-contiguous fractures, the clinical results were better when a minimal number of segments was fused. Therefore, the authors recommend conservative treatment to minimize the number of segments that are fused in non-contiguous multiple thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures when decompression is not necessary.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Descompresión , Osteoporosis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral
4.
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 923-927, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-513141

RESUMEN

Objective To compare treatment and efficacy of thoracolumbar fractures by using three different screw fixations:traditional approach,the vertebral side clearance into the road and percutaneous pedicle. Methods A total of 82 single segmental thoracic lumbar fractures cases hospitalized from March 2011 to March 2014 ,with male 67 cases ,female 15 cases ,and average age(33.7+/-12.5)years old. Patients were randomly divided into three groups:traditional approach group (n = 23),operation through paraspinal muscle gap group (n = 30),percutaneous group(n = 29). These following indicators will be compared in three groups:duration of operation ,intraoperative blood loss ,intraoperative fluoroscopy time ,postoperative flow ,VAS scores before and after operation and Oswestry disability index , difference of spinal sagittal position Cobb′s Angle. Results Compared with the traditional approach group ,operation through paraspinal muscle gap group and percu-taneous group have obvious advantages in duration of operation,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative flow,VAS scores before and after operation ,the Oswestry disability index. Additionally ,above mentioned three surgical methods could recover kyphosis deformity ,and there was no statistically significant difference among three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of monosegmental thoracolumbar fractures ,compared with traditional approach ,operation through paraspinal muscle gap and percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation have more advantages which includes fewer trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery and lower incidence of postoperative low back pain.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA