RESUMEN
Objective:To observe the effect of modified Shengxian Decoction on extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and lung injury prediction score (LIPS) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by sepsis.Methods:Prospective cohort study. A total of 200 patients with ARDS caused by sepsis who were hospitalized in Baoshan Branch, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2019 to May 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group and control group by random number table method, with 100 in each group. The patients in the control group were given rountin western medicine treatment according to the guidelines, and the patients in the observation group were treated with modified Shengxian Decoction on the basis of the treatment in the control group. Both groups were treated for 7 days as a course of treatment. The PH value, oxygen volume index (FiO 2), oxygen partial pressure (PaO 2), arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO 2) of the two groups before and after treatment, calculate the oxygenation index (PaO 2/FiO 2) were observed and compared. The C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were observed by ELISA, the procalcitonin (PCT) levels was detected by double antibody sandwich immunoluminescence method. The APACHE Ⅱ score and LIPS score, EVLWI and cardiac index (CI) of the two groups were observed and compared. The mechanical ventilation time and ICU hospitalization time of the two groups were compared. Results:After treatment, the PaCO 2 level [(37.15 ± 5.42) mmHg vs. (38.24 ± 3.24) mmHg, t=2.03] of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the oxygenation index (292.34 ± 78.91 vs. 236.54 ± 70.58, t=5.27) was significantly higher than that of the control group ( P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of hs-CRP [(35.21 ± 6.73) mg/L vs. (48.97 ± 8.52) mg/L, t=12.67], IL-6 [(40.57 ± 8.51) ng/L vs. (47.61 ± 9.97) ng/L, t=5.37] and PCT [(0.75 ± 0.21) μg/L vs. (1.14 ± 0.38) μg/L, t=8.98] in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.01). After treatment, the APACHE Ⅱscore (11.14 ± 0.54 vs. 14.67 ± 0.89, t=33.91], LIPS score (2.21 ± 0.73 vs. 4.59 ± 0.88, t=20.82), and EVLWI [(6.19 ± 0.42) ml/kg vs. (8.24 ± 0.78) ml/kg, t=23.14) of the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the CI level [(4.49 ± 1.27) L/(min?m 2) vs. (3.61 ± 0.88) L/(min?m 2), t=5.70] was significantly higher than that of the control group ( P<0.01). The mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group ( t=3.66, 5.74, P<0.01). Conclusion:The modified Shengxian Decoction can reduce the level of inflammation indexes in patients with ARDS caused by sepsis, reduce EVLWI and LIPS scores, improve blood gas analysis indexes, and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation and ICU hospitalization.
RESUMEN
Objective:To construct and verify the occurrence model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using lung injury prediction score (LIPS) combined with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score and oxygenation index (PaO 2/FiO 2). Methods:Using a prospective cohort study method, 244 patients with complete medical records who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Peking University Third Hospital from December 2020 to July 2022 were selected as research objects according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were divided into training set (173 cases) and validation set (71 cases). Patients' gender, age, body mass index (BMI), various causes (shock, sepsis, craniocerebral injury, pulmonary contusion, multiple trauma, aspiration, pneumonia, acute abdomen, hypoproteinemia, acidosis, major surgery, etc.), underlying diseases (diabetes, malignant tumor, cerebrovascular disease, liver disease, kidney disease) and laboratory test indicators were collected. According to the above data, the LIPS score, APACHE Ⅱ score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and PaO 2/FiO 2, etc within 24 hours after admission to the ICU were calculated. Univariate analysis was used to screen the influencing factors for the occurrence of ARDS, and the factors with P < 0.2 were included in the multivariate Logistic regression analysis to screen out the independent predictive factors for the occurrence of ARDS. According to the results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis, the risk score of patients with ARDS was obtained to construct the risk prediction model of ARDS, the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. The established ARDS prediction model was externally validated, and ROC curves were drawn to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the prediction model for the occurrence of ARDS in critically ill patients, and the AUC of the validation set was calculated to analyze the predictive performance of each risk factor on the occurrence of ARDS. Results:A total of 173 patients were enrolled in the training set, including 121 patients without ARDS and 52 patients with ARDS; 77 cases of acute abdomen, 64 cases of sepsis, 60 cases of shock, 51 cases of acidosis, 40 cases of hypoproteinemia, 37 cases of diabetes, 34 cases of craniocerebral injury, 34 cases of abnormal liver function, 28 cases of multiple trauma, 23 cases of malignant tumor, 23 cases of spinal orthopedic surgery, 17 cases of obesity, 12 cases of pneumonia, 11 cases of pulmonary contusion, and 7 cases of chronic kidney disease, chemotherapy in 6 cases, and aspiration in 2 cases. The rates of shock, sepsis, acute abdomen, acidosis, abnormal liver function, lung contusion, pneumonia and aspiration, gender, age, LIPS score, APACHE Ⅱ score, and SOFA score in the ARDS group were significantly higher than those in the non-ARDS group (all P < 0.05), moreover, PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio was significantly lower than that of non-ARDS group ( P < 0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that LIPS score, APACHE Ⅱ score, and PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio were independent risk factors for ARDS in ICU patients with high risk factors for ARDS, and the odds ratio ( OR) was 1.768 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 1.380-2.266], 1.242 (95% CI was 1.089-1.417), 0.985 (95% CI was 0.978-0.991), all P < 0.05. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of the ARDS prediction model training set was 0.920, the sensitivity was 86.5%, and the specificity was 86.8%; the AUC of the verification set was 0.896, the sensitivity was 96.8%, and the specificity was 76.6%. Conclusion:LIPS score, APACHE Ⅱ score and PaO 2/FiO 2 are independent risk factors for the occurrence of ARDS in ICU patients with high risk factors for ARDS. The ARDS risk prediction model established based on these three indicators has a good predictive ability for the occurrence of ARDS in critically ill patients, wihich needs to be verified by multicenter cohort studies.