RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the standardized residency training of obstetrics and gynaecology in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University with Milestones evaluation system of obstetrics and gynecology, and to evaluate the feedback effect of the system.Methods:An improved Milestones evaluation form was developed to evaluate the self-evaluation and clinical tutor's scores, collect the results and make a statistical analysis of the 1-3 years standardized training residents of the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University in September 2019. GraphPad Prism 8 software was used for data collection and statistical analysis, and Box-Plots software was used for drawing analysist. Descriptive statistics method was used for the general situation of the research objects. After the students' self-evaluation and tutor's scores passed the normal distribution and variance homogeneity test, paired t test was performed, and the scores of residents from different sources were analyzed by variance analysis. Results:A total of 164 residents of obstetrics and gynaecology were evaluated, and there were significant differences between self-evaluation and teacher's evaluation in medical knowledge, learning ability and system work ( P<0.05). The competency scores of the first year residents ranged from 3.003 to 4.556, and at the end of the course they increased to 4.921 to 5.974, showing statistically significant differences in each item compared with the first year ( P<0.001). After three years of training, residents from different sources showed significant improvement ( P<0.001). Conclusion:The Milestones evaluation system of the obstetrics and gynecology can be used for the training assessment and feedback of the residents in obstetrics and gynecology specialty. The self-assessment of residents helps to understand the level of self-assessment, and the teacher's evaluation helps to correct the bias generated by self-assessment. The systematic and staged Milestones evaluation system can instruct the clinical tutors to instruct the residents in accordance with their aptitude, and give feedback on the training effect of the residency training base.
RESUMEN
Objective To assess the value of internal medicine residency training program at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH),and the feasibility of applying revised Milestones evaluation system.Methods Postgraduate-year-one to four (PGY-1 to PGY-4) residents in PUMCH finished the revised Milestones evaluation scales in September 2017.Residents' self-evaluation and faculty-evaluation scores were calculated.Statistical analysis was conducted on the data.Results A total of 207 residents were enrolled in this cross-sectional study.Both self and faculty scores showed an increasing trend in senior residents.PGY-1 residents were assessed during their first month of residency with scores of 4 points or higher,suggesting that residents have a high starting level.More strikingly,the mean score in PGY-4 was 7 points or higher,proving the career development of residency training program.There was no statistically significant difference between total self-and faculty-evaluation scores.Evaluation scores of learning ability and communication ability were lower in faculty group (t=-2.627,-4.279,all P＜0.05).The scores in graduate students were lower than those in standardized training residents.Conclusions The goal of national standardized residency training is to improve the quality of healthcare and residents' career development.The evaluation results would guide curriculum design and emphasize the importance and necessity of multi-level teaching.Self-evaluation contributes to the understanding of training objectives and personal cognition.