RESUMEN
Background and objectives: Lateral epicondylalgia or tennis elbow is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder that is characterized by lateral elbow pain often associated with gripping tasks. This study was done to compare the effect of Mulligan’s mobilization with Mulligan’s taping and Diamond taping in chronic lateral epicondylitis grip strength. Methods: Forty (n=40) participants with chronic lateral epicondylitis were randomly allocated in two groups. Group ‘A’ received Mulligan’s mobilization with Mulligan’s taping and Group ‘B’ received Diamond taping and both the group received stretching exercise of the common extensors muscle of wrist prior to taping technique. The outcome measure was assessed in terms of Pain free grip strength (PFGS) for grip strength. Results: 20 subjects (n=20) were taken in both the groups with a mean age of 39.3 years in Mulligan’s Mobilization group and 41.95 years in Diamond taping group. Comparison of the pre and post values showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in grip strength in both the groups. When comparison of pre-test grip strength were done, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in both the groups, this proves the fact that both the group started with the same intensity of grip strength while the post intervention comparison showed a significant improvement in grip strength (p<0.05) in both the groups. Conclusion: Mulligan’s Mobilization and Diamond taping intervention were equally beneficial in improvising the grip strength in patients with lateral epicondylitis.
RESUMEN
Background: Adhesive Capsulitis most commonly referred to as ”Frozen Shoulder” is an insidious Painful Condition with progressive and gradual restriction of all planes of movement in the glenohumeral joint. Evidence shows Mulligan's mobilization with movement (MWM) mobilization technique is more effective than muscle energy techniques (MET) and conventional therapy in improving shoulder function. Therefore the present study intends to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques along with Mulligan’s mobilization with movement, in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint. Methods: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted among 30 subjects including both sex groups aged between 40-60 years diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. They were randomly assigned into two groups with 15 subjects each. Group A received Mulligan’s mobilization alone, and Group B received Mulligan’s mobilization along with MET. Both the groups received the treatment protocol six times a week for three weeks. Pre and post evaluation of pain was done by using the short-form McGill pain questionnaire, range of motion by the Universal Goniometer and the functional disability by using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Results: There was a significant improvement (P<0.05) in pre and post-intervention levels in both groups. Between groups analysis, the results are: a range of motion improved 30%, and the values are flexion with a p-value of 0.010, for abduction, internal and external rotations with a p-value of 0.000 except for extension with a p-value of 0.109. On comparison of SPADI using Mann Whitney U test, it showed 50% improvement with a significant difference with a p-value of 0.001 and McGill improved for more than 70% with a p-value of 0.000. Conclusion: Mulligan’s mobilization along with Muscle Energy Technique is found to be more effective in improving quality of life among subjects with adhesive capsulitis of shoulder than Mulligan’s mobilization alone.
RESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To verify the clinical therapeutic effects on shoulder joint pain of rotator cuff injury treated with electroacupuncture (EA) and Mulligan's mobilization.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 120 patients of shoulder joint pain of rotator cuff injury were randomized into an EA group, a rehabilitation group and a combined therapy group, 40 cases in each one. In the EA group, EA was applied to Jianzhen (SI 9), Jianliao (TE 14), Jianyu (LI 15), Tianzong (SI 11), Jianqian (extra) and Binao (LI 14) in the affected side. Of these acupoints, Jianliao (TE 14) and Jianyu (LI 15), Jianzhen (SI 9) and Tianzong (SI 11) were stimulated with's electric apparatus. In the rehabilitation group, Mulligan's mobilization was used, including scapular mobilization, static joint mobilization and dynamic joint mobilization. In the combined therapy group, EA was used in combination with Mulligan mobilization. The treatment was given once a day in each group, 5 sessions a week, totally for 6 weeks. The pain intensity of shoulder joint (VAS), the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA) and the range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint were evaluated before and 6 weeks after treatment separately. The adverse reactions were recorded in each group.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>VAS scores were all reduced, UCLA scores increased and ROM improved after treatment as compared with those before treatment in the patients of the three groups (all<0.05). After treatment, VAS score, UCLA score and ROM in the combined therapy group were remarkably improved as compared with those in the EA group and the rehabilitation group (all<0.05). Regarding the improvements of VAS and UCLA scores, the results in the EA group were better than those in the rehabilitation group (both<0.05). Regarding ROM improvement, the results in the rehabilitation group were superior to those in the EA group (all<0.05). There was no adverse reaction in the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The combined therapy of EA and Mulligan's mobilization relieves shoulder joint pain of rotator cuff injury, better than the simple application of either EA or Mulligan's mobilization.</p>
RESUMEN
Background: Cervical Spondylitis (CS) is a common term that denotes degenerative changes that develop with of trauma-centre patients, specific age groups, and head injury patients. A study done on Indian population reported 78% of radiological changes of CS at C5-C6 and C6-C7 levels in asymptomatic individuals. These degenerative changes in the cervical spine may remain asymptomatic or can present as pure axial neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, cervical myelopathy, or cervical myeloradiculopathy. So, the aim of the study was to check the effectiveness of Mulligans Mobilizations with Upper Limb Movement and McKenzie Exercises with Neural Mobilizations in Patients with Cervical Spondylitis. Materials and methods: 60 patients were included in the study which was divided into two groups ; Group A and Group B, 30 patients in each group. Subjects were randomly selected and assigned to each group A pre-test measurement with the help of two measures - Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPNPQ) for disability and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Inclinometer for a range of Sreenivasu Kotagiri, Anup Kumar Songa, Mayuri Vijay Gad, Nazz Sulthan. Effectiveness of Mulligans Mobilizations with Upper Limb Movement and McKenzie Exercises with Neural Mobilizations in Patients with Cervical Spondylitis. IAIM, 2018; 5(5): 146-155. Page 147 motion cervical spine movements was done in each group. Subjects in Group-A were given Mulligan Mobilization with Upper Limb Movement for cervical regain for 45 minutes 4 days for one week in four weeks subject were sitting Subjects in Group-B was given McKenzie Exercises with Neural Mobilization for 45 minutes 4 days for one week in four weeks subject were in supine position and remains relaxed with the feet uncrossed. Result analysis was done by Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test (Mann Whitney U Test). Results: On comparing Group A and Group B for post-treatment VAS score and NPNPQ score, results showed a significant difference (p=0.001) in improvement in terms of VAS and NPNPQ. The overall study proved that both Mulligan mobilization with upper limb movement and McKenzie exercises with neural mobilization were effective in improving Pain and decreasing the disability level in cervical radiculopathy subjects. Conclusion: McKenzie exercise with neural mobilization is better than mulligan mobilization with upper limb movements in cervical radiculopathy. Results supported that McKenzie exercise with neural mobilization was more effective than mulligan mobilization to improve pain and disability in a patient with cervical radiculopathy.
RESUMEN
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease causing disability. Current Physical therapy management for knee OA is aiming to increase range of motion and improve functional performance. So the purpose of this study to assess the effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization along with Conventional Physiotherapy in Knee osteoarthritis patients. Method: Patients of knee pain who fulfilled inclusion criteria were taken in study. Outcome like The Knee Injury & osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Index, ROM with the help of Universal Goniometer, Manual muscle testing with Medical Research Council (MRC) scale &time up and Go test were taken at baseline and after 4 wks. Mulligan Mobilization along with conventional Physiotherapy was given to all patients for 4 wks. Result: Showed there was significant improvement 25.08% in Koos Index, while in knee flexion ROM, improvement on right side was 9.94% or in left side 6.20%. while muscle strength in MMT with 25% on right side or 4% on left side improvement seen for knee flexor and 5% on right side or no any improvement seen on left side for knee extensor. Time up and go test also showed 10.89% improvement compared to baseline. Conclusion: Improvement is seen in patients with knee osteoarthritis by Mulligan Mobilization along with Conventional Physiotherapy.