Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 82(6): 654-661, Oct.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-828249

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction: The main reason for nasal tampon placement after septoplasty is to prevent postoperative hemorrhage, while the secondary purpose is internal stabilization after operations involving the cartilaginous-bony skeleton of the nose. Silicone intranasal splints are as successful as other materials in controlling postoperative hemorrhages of septal origin. The possibility of leaving the splints intranasally for extended periods helps stabilize the septum in the midline. However, there is nothing in the literature about how long these splints can be retained inside the nasal cavity without increasing the risk of infection, postoperative complications, and patient discomfort. Objective: The current study aimed to evaluate the association between the duration of intranasal splinting and bacterial colonization, postoperative complications, and patient discomfort. Methods: Patients who had undergone septoplasty were divided into three groups according to the day of removal of the silicone splints. The splints were removed on the fifth, seventh, and tenth postoperative days. The removed splints were microbiologically cultured. Early and late complications were assessed, including local and systemic infections, tissue necrosis, granuloma formation, mucosal crusting, synechia, and septal perforation. Postoperative patient discomfort was evaluated by scoring the levels of pain and nasal obstruction. Results: No significant difference was found in the rate of bacterial colonization among the different groups. Decreased mucosal crusting and synechia were detected with longer usage intervals of intranasal silicone splints. Postoperative pain and nasal obstruction were also diminished by the third postoperative day. Conclusions: Silicone splints were well tolerated by the patients and any negative effects on postoperative patient comfort were limited. In fact, prolonged splint usage intervals reduced late complications. Long-term silicone nasal splint usage is a reliable, effective, and comfortable method in patients with excessive mucosal damage and in whom long-term stabilization of the bony and cartilaginous septum is essential.


Resumo Introdução: A principal razão para a colocação de tampões nasais em septoplastias é a prevenção de hemorragia pós-operatória, enquanto o objetivo secundário é a estabilização interna após cirurgias que envolvam o esqueleto cartilaginoso do nariz. Os splints intranasais de silicone são tão eficazes como outros materiais para o controle de hemorragias do septo no pós-operatório. A possibilidade de manter os splints intranasais por longos períodos ajuda a estabilizar o septo na linha média. No entanto, não há nada na literatura sobre quanto tempo esses splints podem ser mantidos na cavidade nasal sem aumentar o risco de infecção, complicações no pós-operatório e causar desconforto ao paciente. Objetivos: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a associação entre o tempo de tamponamento com splints intranasais e colonização bacteriana, complicações no pós-operatório e desconforto do paciente. Método: Os pacientes submetidos a septoplastia foram divididos em três grupos, de acordo com o dia da remoção dos splints de silicone. Os splints foram removidos no 5°, 7° e 10° dias de pós-operatório, e a seguir, cultivados microbiologicamente. Complicações precoces e tardias foram avaliadas, incluindo infecções locais e sistêmicas, necrose do tecido, formação de granulomas, crostas na mucosa, sinéquias e perfuração do septo. O desconforto do paciente no pós-operatório foi avaliado com o uso de pontuação dos níveis de dor e de obstrução nasal. Resultados: Nenhuma diferença significante foi encontrada na taxa de colonização bacteriana entre os diferentes grupos. Diminuições da formação de crostas na mucosa e de sinéquias foram detectadas com tempos mais longos de uso de splints de silicone. A dor e a obstrução nasal também diminuíram no terceiro dia de pós-operatório. Conclusões: O uso de splints de silicone foi bem tolerado pelos pacientes, e seus efeitos negativos sobre o conforto do paciente no pós-operatório foram limitados. De fato, o tempo prolongado de uso teve um efeito redutor sobre as complicações tardias. O uso prolongado de splint nasal de silicone é um método confiável, eficaz e pouco desconfortável em pacientes com lesão excessiva da mucosa e naqueles cuja estabilização óssea e cartilaginosa do septo a longo prazo é essencial.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Rinoplastia/métodos , Férulas (Fijadores)/microbiología , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Tabique Nasal/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio , Rinoplastia/efectos adversos , Férulas (Fijadores)/efectos adversos , Férulas (Fijadores)/estadística & datos numéricos , Tampones Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Tampones Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios Prospectivos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control
2.
Korean Journal of Dermatology ; : 1219-1224, 2002.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-28393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For securing FTSG, bolus tie-over dressing is a universally accepted method, but it has some definite disadvantages. For example, bulky dressing inhibits the drainage from graft bed and can lead to maceration by occlusion. Time and effort is necessary to secure dressing and the help of an assistant is also mandatory to tie the suture much easier. OBJECTIVES: In an attempt to find a better dressing material, we evaluated the usefulness of thermoplastic nasal splints (Aquaplast(R)) for securing graft in FTSG reconstruction. METHODS: Thirteen patients with surgical defects following tumor excision from the nose(9 patients), forehead(1), lip(1), hand(1), shin(1) ranging from 12mm to 40mm in the largest diameter were reconstructed with a FTSG. For securing FTSG, a heat-moldable nasal splint was heated, contoured in place over sutured graft on recipient area with/without suture of the splint with skin. RESULTS: All of the 13 FTSG secured with nasal splints showed a good take with a satisfactory cosmetic results. Except hypertrophic scars in 4 patients, which were not significant and improved with several times intralesional injection of triamcinolone, there were no other complications. CONCLUSION: We have found a heat-moldable nasal splint to be useful material to secure FTSG, especially for the complex contoured area such as nose or ear. This technique saves time and effort and there is no need of an assistant.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Vendajes , Cicatriz Hipertrófica , Drenaje , Oído , Calor , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Nariz , Piel , Férulas (Fijadores) , Suturas , Trasplantes , Triamcinolona
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA