RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of different enteral nutrition methods combined with swallowing rehabilitation training in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease complicated by dysphagia.Methods:A total of 120 patients with Alzheimer's disease and dysphagia who received treatment in the Department of Geriatric Medicine, the Second Hospital of Jinhua from October 2019 to March 2021 were included in this study. They were randomly and evenly divided into four groups: A, B, C, and D. Patients in groups A, B, C, and D were given nasogastric tube feeding, naso-intestinal tube feeding, nasogastric tube feeding + swallowing rehabilitation training, and naso-intestinal tube feeding + swallowing rehabilitation training, respectively. After 12 weeks of treatment, total response rate, nutritional status, and complications were compared between the four groups.Results:After 12 weeks of treatment, total response rate in group D was the highest (100.0%), which was significantly higher than that in the other three groups (group A: 13.3%; group B: 40.0%; group C: 73.3%; χ2 = 45.88, 25.71, 9.23, all P < 0.05). After treatment, the nutritional status [body mass index (BMI): (21.42 ± 1.85) kg/m 2, (23.17 ± 2.03) kg/m 2] and patient satisfaction (60.0%, 100.0%) in groups C and D were significantly superior to those in group A [BMI: (19.01 ± 1.72) kg/m 2; patient satisfaction: 10.0%) and group B [BMI: (19.86 ± 1.69) kg/m 2; patient satisfaction: 33.3%]. Group D had the best nutritional status ( t = 7.01, 5.14, 1.78, all P < 0.05) and the highest patient satisfaction ( χ2 = 49.09, 30.00, 15.00, all P < 0.001). Conclusion:Naso-intestinal tube feeding combined with swallowing rehabilitation training is the best treatment for Alzheimer's disease complicated by dysphagia among the studied enteral nutrition feeding methods and therefore deserves clinical promotion.
RESUMEN
Adhesive intestinal obstruction is the most common type of ileus, and conserva-tive treatment serves as its preferred treatment option. In the course of conservative treatment, gastrointestinal decompression will relieve symptoms, prevent ileus progression and promote gas-trointestinal function recovery, which has significant clinical effects. Currently, decompression effects of nasointestinal tubes and nasogastric tubes are controversial. There is a previous Meta-analysis evaluating decompression effects of these two methods, but this analysis includes non-randomized controlled trial and lacks research about Chinese patients. Therefore, the authors con-duct a Meta-analysis to evaluate decompression effects of nasointestinal tubes versus nasogastric tubes for adhesive intestinal obstruction.