RESUMEN
Objective: To assess the feasibility of nephrectomy via combined transgastric and transvesical approach in a porcine model, and to summarize our experience. Methods: Three female pigs were used in this study. The transvesical access was established using ureteroscope. The vesical hole was enlarged with the dilator of ureteroscope sheath and a self-designed Trocar was inserted. The gastroscope was inserted through a hole on gastric wall, which was made using a needle knife and dilator under ureteroscopy. The ultrasound knife, scissor and clips were introduced via the Trocar, and the nephrectomy was completed under the guidance of gastroscope. Results: The six kidneys of the three pigs were successfully resected, with the operation time being (132±10.5) min, without noticeable hemorrhage or complications. Mild hemorrhage occurred after ultrasonic ligation in the first nephrectomy, and was managed by clips. Clips were used to block the vessels before resection for the remaining five kidneys. Conclusion: Our method via combined approach is technically feasible for nephrectomy in a porcine model, but the kidneys have not been taken out and the puncture wounds on the bladder and gastric wall have not been closed, so further study is still needed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new era of minimally invasive surgery which has the potential to offer scarless surgery. So far, numerous reports on various routes to peritoneal organs in NOTES have been published. In case of transgastric approach, it is more inconvenient than transcolonic approach to access upper abdominal organs because of retroflexion. However, most data were subjective and there was no report examining the best access route for the exploration of peritoneal organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the best access route according to the abdominal organs objectively. METHODS: Six female pigs weighing 30 to 35 kg were placed under general anesthesia. Incisions were made on both anterior wall of stomach body and rectosigmoid colon 15 to 20 cm above anal verge, respectively. Then, via each incision site, we evaluated the endoscopic visibility and checked the elapsed time to access abdominal organs in sequence (gallbladder (GB), spleen, bladder, uterus, and ovary). RESULTS: On comparison of the mean time to approach each organs, GB and ovary showed statistical difference in the mean time to approach between transgastric and transcolonic approaches. It took relatively shorter time to access GB via transcolonic route than transgastric route (352.3+/-80.1 sec vs. 222.2+/-82.0 sec, p=0.021). Next, we evaluated the time to access upper organs (GB and spleen) and lower organs (bladder, uterus and ovary). In case of lower organs, it showed no difference in time between transgastric and transcolonic approaches. However, to explore upper organs, transcolonic route was more favorable than transgastric route (351.8+/-80.7 sec vs. 273.3+/-110.3 sec, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For exploration of lower organs, there is statistically no significant difference in time between transgastric and transcolonic approaches. But, in case of upper organs, transcolonic approach is superior to transgastric approach.