Factors Affecting Early and 1-Year Motor Recovery Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Cohort Review

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The study was aimed at evaluating clinicoradiological factors affecting recovery of neurological deficits in cases of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treated by lumbar microdiscectomy. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The majority of the available literature on neurological recovery following neurodeficit is limited to retrospective series. The literature is currently limited regarding variables that can help predict the recovery of neurodeficits following LDH. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 70 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy (L1–2 to L5–S1) owing to neurological deficits due to LDH. Patients with motor power ≤3/5 in L2–S1 myotomes were considered for analysis. Follow-up was performed at 2, 6, and 12 months to note recovery of motor deficits. Clinicoradiological parameters were compared between the recovered and nonrecovered groups. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were available at the final follow-up: 41 (63%) had completely recovered by 2 months; four showed delayed recovery at the 6-month follow-up; and 20 (30.7%) showed no recovery at 1 year. Clinicoradiological factors, including diabetes, complete initial deficit, areflexia, multilevel disc prolapse, longer duration since initial symptoms, and ≥2 previous symptomatic episodes were associated with a significant risk of poorer recovery (p 0.05 for all). Diabetes mellitus (p=0.033) and complete initial motor deficit (p=0.028) were significantly associated with delayed recovery in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The overall neurological recovery rate in our study was 69%. Diabetes mellitus (p=0.033) and complete initial motor deficit were associated with delayed motor recovery.

Neurologic Recovery According to the Spinal Fracture Patterns by Denis Classification

PURPOSE: Although Denis classification is considered as one of most clinically useful schemes for the evaluation of spinal fracture, there is little documentation on the relationship between fracture pattern and the neurologic recovery. The purpose is to evaluate the correlation between the fracture patterns according to Denis classification and neurologic recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 38 patients (26 men and 12 women) in this series had an average follow-up of 47.1 months, and they were all managed surgically. Denis classification had been used prospectively to determine the fracture morphology. Frankel Scale and American Spinal Injury Association Spinal Cord Injury Assessment Form [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score] were obtained before surgery, after surgery and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The common injuries making neurologic deterioration were burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The degree of neurologic deficits seen first and at the final follow-up was more severe in fracture-dislocation than burst fracture. The neurologic recovery was not different between burst fracture and fracture-dislocation, assessed by Frankel grading and ASIA scoring system. The neurologic recovery evaluated by ASIA score was not different between the lumbar and thoracic spinal fracture. The neurologic recovery assessed by Frankel grade was greater in the lumbar spinal fractures in than the thoracic spinal fractures. CONCLUSION: The severity of initial and the final follow-up neurologic deficits were correlated with the fracture patterns according to Denis classification, but the neurologic recovery was not correlated.

Neurologic Recovery According to Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of early magnetic resonance imaging findings in predicting neurologic recovery at or below the injured level in traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries. Thirty patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries were included. All of the patients received a magnetic resonance imaging and a neurologic examination in the emergency room, within 7 days of injury and at 6 months following the injury. To quantify neurologic recovery below the injured level, we modified clinical scales, particularly the motor ratio and the sensory ratio. We used the neurologic level to quantify recovery around the injured level. We assessed neurologic recovery according to MRI patterns and lesion extents. The pure hemorrhagic MRI pattern was not observed. In edematous and mixed types, the improvement of neurologic levels was not significantly different. The motor ratio and sensory ratio improved significantly more in edematous type patients than in mixed type patients. Based on MRI lesion extent, the improvement of neurologic levels was not significantly different, and motor ratio and sensory ratio improved significantly more in those with one or two segments involved than in those with more than two segments involved. In conclusion, early MRI pattern and lesion extent after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury may provide important information to help predict neurologic recovery, especially below the injured level.

The Correlation of Recovery of Ipsilateral Motor Weakness and That of Contralateral Hemiplegia in Stroke

OBJECTIVE: We observed the nature of ipsilateral weakness, not hemiplegic side after stroke. And we studied correlation between ipsilateral weakness and neurologic recovery of hemiplegia. METHOD: This study was prospective, follow-up clinical trial. Ipsilateral motor power was checked serially in 20 subjects using Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester (NMMT) (shoulder abduction, wrist extension, hip flexion, ankle dorsiflexion). The subjects are first attacked hemiplegic stroke patients. Other outcome measures are Mini-mental Status Examination (MMSE) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). We studied correlations between motor power recovery in ipsilateral limbs and recovery of neurologic impairment in hemiplegic limbs of stroke patients through SPSS 7.0 program. RESULTS: Ipsilateral motor power in early stage stroke patients is significantly low compared with that of normal subject except ankle dorsiflexion (p<0.05). Comparing ipsilateral proximal with distal limbs power in pre and post multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, upper proximal part recovered faster than the distal part, but which was not statistically significant. Recovery of ipsilateral upper proximal and distal limb weakness is associated with neurologic recovery in hemiplegic side. CONCLUSION: After the stroke, ipsilateral upper limb motor weakness does occur and which follows similar neurologic recovery pattern to the hemiplegic side. Ipsilateral cortical and subcortical tracts take effect on the neurologic recovery of contalateral side.

Neurologic Injury and Recovery Patterns in the Spinal Fractures by Denis Classification / 대한척추외과학회지

PURPOSE: To determine whether there was a preponderance of a fracture type associated with early and late neurologic deterioration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review of all the surgically managed spinal fractures from October 1989 to July 1999 was performed. Of the 83 surgically managed patients, 39 had spinal cord injury. The other 44 patients in this consecutive series had no spinal cord injury. Charts, operative notes, preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and follow up records of all patients were reviewed carefully from the time of surgery until last follow-up assessment. The classification of Denis had been used prospectively for all patients before their surgery to determine the fracture morphology. Frankel Scale and American Spinal Injury Association Spinal Cord Injury Assessment Form(ASIA) were obtained during follow-up evaluation for all patients. RESULTS: All patients were observed over mean 57.4 months except 1 patient who died of pulmonary thromboembolism 1 week after surgery. In Denis classification, the most common injuries were burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The degree of neurologic injury when first seen and at the latest follow up was different between burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The extent of neurologic recovery was not different between burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The fracture-dislocation was common in thoracic spine and the degree of neurologic injury was most severe in thoracic spine. Instead, the burst fracture was more common in lumbar spine and the degree of neurologic injury was relatively mild in lumbar spine. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of initial posttraumatic and the last follow up neurologic injuries were correlated with the fracture patterns by Denis classification, but the extent of neurologic recovery was not correlated with the fracture patterns by Denis classification. The lumbar fracture, injuring the cauda equina and the sacral nerve roots, shows greater recovery patterns than thoracic spine fractures.

Comparative Analysis of Neurologic Recovery with or without Laminectomy in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures with Neurologic Symptoms / 대한정형외과학회잡지

Recently there has been a progressive increase of thoracolumbar fractures with neurologic symptoms. It has been thought that laminectomy increased instability and was therefore considered a contraindication. Currently, with the development of instrument for posterior stabilization, it is possible to perform posterior fusion and instrumentation, both with and without laminectomy. To compare the effect of neurologic recovery with and without laminectomy, we analyzed the clinical records of 38 patients with neurologic symptoms who were evaluated with plain radiographs and CT before and after surgery from 1989 to 1996 in Gyeong-Sang National University Hospital. We divided our cases into two groups, one group consisted open reduction with laminectomy and instrumentation with posterior fusion. The other group consisted of open reduction without laminectomy and instrumentation with posterior fusion. Twenty three of 38 were operated with open reduction and internal fixation with laminectomy and others were operated without laminectomy. The results were that both groups had improvement of neurologic symptoms after surgery and at follow-up. There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. Depending on the time interval between injury and surgery, patients who were underwent emergency surgery had an marked improvement of neurologic symptoms. Except cases of complete paraplegia, incomplete paraplegic patients who were operated within 24 hours with laminectomy group had greater improvement than those without laminectomy. The improvement was statistically significant(P<0.05).

The Time-course of Neurologic Recovery in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Possible mechanisms of neurologic recovery in spinal cord injury were postulated by Ditunno Jr. JF in 1987. The first window encompasses recovery from neurapraxia within 6 to 8 weeks. The second window covers the period from 2 to 8 months after the injury. Recovery during this period might be due to peripheral sprouting of intact nerves to denervated muscle and hypertrophy of functioning muscles. The third window of recovery happens usually beyond 8 to 12 months when axonal regeneration may play a role in further increases in strength. On the basis of these possible mechanisms, we measured the neurological and functional recovery rate according to the periods of these possible mechanisms of motor recovery through 12 months following injury in 21 traumatic spinal cord injury patients. The results were as follows: 1) Neurologically, the most rapid recovery was shown within 6 to 8 weeks after injury, during the phase of recovery from neurapraxia. 2) Most of functional recovery occured in the period between 2 month and 8 month of the compensatory phase. 3) Statistically significant correlation between motor and functional recovery was shown among the incomplete spinal cord injury group. These data would be helpful in planning a timely appropriate rehabilitation program by understanding the time-course of neurologic recovery and prognostication of neurologic and functional recovery in the spinal-cord injured.