Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine ; (12): 748-754, 2023.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-989839

RESUMEN

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) combined with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the treatment of infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on preterm infants of gestational age ≤34 weeks with RDS who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Xuzhou Central Hospital from October 2019 to November 2021. The infants were randomly assigned into the LISA+NIPPV group and the intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) +nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) group. In the LISA+NIPPV group, with the support of NIPPV, a Lisa tube was inserted through the vocal cords under direct vision with direct laryngoscope, and then pulmonary surfactant (PS) was infused into the lung. In the INSURE+NCPAP group, the patients were endotracheally intubated and infused with PS into the lung through endotracheal tube, then extubated and continued to receive NCPAP therapy (INSURE). The blood gas analysis at 1 h and 6 h after PS infusion, the adverse reactions during injection, clinical efficacy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other related complications were compared between the two groups.Results:A total of 112 preterm infants with RDS were enrolled, including 58 in the LISA+NIPPV group and 54 in the INSURE+NCPAP group. The blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO 2) and PaO 2/FiO 2 (P/F) in the LISA+NIPPV group were significantly higher than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group at 1 h and 6 h after PS infusion, while carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO 2) were significantly lower than that in the INSURE+NCPAP group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The rate of tracheal intubation within 72 h (15.5% vs. 33.3%), the duration of non-invasive ventilation [ (7.5 ± 4.3) d vs.(9.9 ± 5.5) d ], total oxygen inhaling [ (10.5 ± 3.5) d vs.(13.3 ± 4.1) d ], failure rate of machine withdrawal (8.6% vs. 31.0% ), the times of apnea [7.0 (3.0-21.0) times vs. 15.0 (4.0-28.0) times ] and re-administration of PS (17.2% vs. 33.3%) in the LISA+NIPPV group were significantly lower than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The incidence of regurgitation in the LISA+NIPPV group was lower than that in the INSURE+NCPAP group (13.8% vs. 35.2%), and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the time needed for intubation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The occurrence of BPD in the LISA+NIPPV group was significantly lower than that in the INSURE+NCPAP group (10.3% vs. 25.9%), and there was no significant difference in other related complication between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:LISA combined with NIPPV in the treatment of preterm infants with RDS can effectively improve oxygenation, reduce carbon dioxide retention, reduce the mechanical ventilation rate, shorten the duration of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and reduce the incidence of BPD.

2.
Bol. méd. Hosp. Infant. Méx ; 79(4): 222-227, Jul.-Aug. 2022. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1403643

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: Bronchiolitis is one of the most frequent reasons for admission to pediatric intensive care units. Medical treatment is primarily supportive. The usefulness of high-flow oxygen (HFO) nasal cannula in these patients has been described. This study evaluated the clinical and analytical variables of patients admitted to our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for initiation or continuation of HFO for respiratory distress and to identify any variable that may be a predictor of success or failure of this technique. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study that included infants aged < 24 months admitted to our PICU due to bronchiolitis between January 2015 and March 2019 for HFO. Results: We analyzed the characteristics between responders (n = 112) and non-responders (n = 37). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding sex, age, weight, comorbidities, nasopharyngeal aspirate result, hours of evolution, and respiratory and heart rate. However, a pCO2 ≥ 75 mmHg (p = 0.043) and a SCORE of bronchiolitis severity (p = 0.032) were predictors of HFNC failure. Conclusions: The pCO2 level and SCORE of bronchiolitis severity are predictors of this respiratory support modality.


Resumen Introducción: La bronquiolitis es uno de los motivos más frecuentes de ingreso en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (UCIP); el tratamiento médico es básicamente de soporte. Se ha descrito la utilidad de la oxigenoterapia de alto flujo (OAF) en estos pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar algunas variables clínicas y analíticas de los pacientes que ingresan en nuestra UCIP para inicio o continuación de OAF ante cuadros de dificultad respiratoria e identificar cualquier variable que pueda ser factor predictor del éxito o fracaso de esta técnica. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo observacional, incluyendo lactantes menores de 24 meses ingresados en la UCIP entre enero de 2015 y marzo de 2019 para OAF ante cuadros de bronquiolitis. Resultados: Se analizaron las características entre el grupo de respondedores (n = 112) y no respondedores (n = 37). No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto al sexo, edad, peso, comorbilidades, resultado del aspirado naso-faríngeo, horas de evolución, frecuencia respiratoria, frecuencia cardiaca entre ambos grupos. Sin embargo, una pCO2 ≥75 mmHg (p = 0.043) y un SCORE de gravedad de la bronquiolitis mayor (p = 0.032) fueron factores predictores de fracaso de la OAF. Conclusiones: El nivel de pCO2 y el SCORE de gravedad de la bronquiolitis son factores predictores de esta modalidad de soporte respiratorio.

3.
Chinese Journal of Neonatology ; (6): 298-304, 2022.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-955255

RESUMEN

Objective:To study the efficacy and safety of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) combined with bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).Methods:Premature infants with RDS at gestational age of 26~32 weeks in the NICU of our hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. They were randomly assigned to the LISA+BiPAP group or the intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) + nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) group, and given the corresponding treatment according to the group. The blood gas analysis at 1 h and 6 h after intratracheal instillation of pulmonary surfactant (PS), medication, noninvasive respiratory support time, total oxygen use time, weaning failure rate and endotracheal intubation rate within 72 h after PS administration were compared between the two groups, as well as the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).Results:A total of 86 preterm infants with RDS were enrolled in the study, including 44 in the LISA+BiPAP group and 42 in the INSURE+NCPAP group. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen in the LISA+BiPAP group at 1 h and 6 h after intratracheal instillation of PS were higher than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group, while PaCO 2 and oxygenation index (OI) were lower than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The duration of noninvasive respiratory support time [(12.2±8.7) d vs. (16.0 ±7.6) d], total oxygen use time [(16.6 ±8.3) d vs. (20.3±7.4) d], length of hospitalization[(22.6±10.3) d vs. (27.1±12.6) d], weaning failure rate [(11.4% (5/44) vs. 31.0% (13/42)], endotracheal intubation rate within 72 h after PS administration [11.4% (5/44) vs. 28.6% (12/42)], and re-administration of PS [18.2% (8/44) vs. 38.1% (16/42)] in the LISA+BiPAP group were lower than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The time needed for intubation and the incidence of regurgitation in the LISA+BiPAP group were lower than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The incidence of BPD in the LISA+BiPAP group was lower than those in the INSURE+NCPAP group [11.4% (5/44) vs. 31.0% (13/42)] ( P<0.05), the difference was also statistically significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:LISA combined with BiPAP can effectively improve oxygenation, reduce the mechanical ventilation rate, shorten the duration of non-invasive respiratory support, and reduce the incidence of BPD in the treatment of premature infants with RDS at the gestational age of 26~32 weeks.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA