RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic can lead to stress, especially for pregnant women and mothers of babies. It is important to propose resources for them to cope with specific stressors and promote their health and well-being. Two psychoeducational flyers, based on the Coping Dispositional Theory, on information about the COVID-19 and on Positive Psychology interventions are presented in this article. The content validity of the flyers was analyzed, adopting CVC indexes > 0.80. Five experts evaluated theflyers qualitatively, while nine pregnant women and mothers, evaluated themusing a 5-point Likert scale. They responded to a Google Form, sent via WhatsApp, which included a TCLE, a General data protocol and a Questionnaire about the clarity of language, relevance, pertinence, and presentation of the flyers. Considering the results, we highlight the validity of the flyersfor pregnant women (CVC> 0.93) and for mothers (CVC > 0.86 and 1.0) as useful resources for coping with the COVID-19 pandemic.
A pandemia da COVID-19 resulta em estresse, especialmente para gestantes e mães de bebês. É importante propor recursos para elas lidarem com estressores específicos e, então, promover sua saúde e bem-estar. Dois flyers psicoeducativos, baseados na Teoria Disposicional do Coping, informações sobre a COVID-19 e intervenções da Psicologia Positiva são apresentados neste artigo. A validade de conteúdo dos flyers foi analisada, adotando-se índices CVC > 0.80. Cinco experts avaliaram qualitativamente, enquanto nove participantes, gestantes e mães, avaliaram os flyers usando uma escala Likert de 5 pontos. Elas responderam a um Google Form enviado via WhatsApp, que incluiu TCLE, Protocolo de dados gerais e Questionário sobre clareza da linguagem, pertinência, relevância e apresentação dos flyers. Destaca-se a validade dos flyers para gestantes (CVC> 0.93) e mães (CVC > 0.86 e 1.0) como recursos úteis para enfrentar a pandemia da COVID-19.
La pandemia del COVID-19 produce estrés, especialmente para mujeres embarazadas y madres de bebés. Es importante proponer recursos para que ellas se puedan enfrentar los estresores específicos y luego promover su salud y bienestar. En este artículo se presentan dos folletos psicoeducativos, basados en la Teoría de Afrontamiento Disposiciónal, información sobre el COVID-19 y las intervenciones de la Psicología Positiva. Se analizó la validez de contenido de los folletos, adoptando índices CVC > 0.80. Cinco expertos evaluaron cualitativamente, mientras que nueve participantes, mujeres embarazadas y madres, evaluaron los folletos utilizando una escala Likert de 5 puntos. Ellas respondieron a un formulario de Google, enviado a través de WhatsApp, que incluía el TCLE, Protocolo general de datos y Cuestionario sobre comprensión del lenguaje, relevancia, pertinencia y presentación de los folletos. La validez de los folletos para mujeres embarazadas (CVC > 0.93) y para madres (CVC > 0.86 y 1.0) se destacan como recursos útiles para afrontar la pandemia del COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Psicología Positiva , COVID-19/psicología , Madres/psicología , Brasil , Salud Mental , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Objective@#To investigate the relationship between the epidemic of Coronavirus Disease in 2019 (COVID-19) in China and population migration from Wuhan before the city implemented strict migration restrictions.@*Methods@#We collected the cumulative number of confirmed cases with COVID-19 up to January 31, 2020 from the official website of the health administrative departments, and information on population migration out of Wuhan during January 10, 2020 and January 24, 2020, approximately half months prior to the implementation of strict migration restrictions by the city, from Baidu population-migration big data platform. Population migration data were provided for the top 100 cities in the form of percentage values, calculated as the number of migrants from Wuhan into these cities divided by the total number of migrants out of Wuhan during the same period multiplied by 100%. The two-independent sample non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the distribution of cumulative number of cases between the top 100 cities and the remaining 205 non-top 100 cities of China. The relationship between the cumulative number of cases and the percentage of migrants from Wuhan into the top 100 cities were further assessed by Pearson correlation and by multiple linear regression with adjustment for population size, population density, and GDP per capita.@*Results@#The top 100 cities accounted for 91.6% of total migrants out of Wuhan, and the top 14 cities were all in Hubei province. There were a total of 5,869 cases in the top 100 cities, with a median (interquartile range) of 21.5 (12~55) cases, whereas in the 205 non-top 100 cities there were a total of 1,063 cases, with a median (interquartile range) of 4 (2~7) cases. The median cumulative number of cases differed significantly between the two types of cities (P<0.001). Among the top 100 cities, there was a strong correlation between the percentage of migrants from Wuhan and the cumulated number of cases (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.92), and for every 1 percentage point increase in migrants from Wuhan the cumulative number of cases increased by approximately 42 (95%CI, 39 to 45). The number of cumulative number of cases in Wenzhou and Chongqing was detected as potential outliers in regression diagnosis (P<0.001, corresponding standardized residuals were 5.2 and 3.5, respectively), suggesting that the number of cases in these two cities was substantially higher than others with similar amount of migrants from Wuhan.@*Conclusions@#There is a strong positive association between the percentage of migrants from Wuhan and the epidemic status of COVID-19 infections in cities in China.