Unplanned conversion during minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors and surgical outcomes

PURPOSE: Unplanned conversion is sometimes necessary during minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aims of this study were to compare surgical outcomes of planned MILR and unplanned conversion and to investigate the risk factors after unplanned conversion.METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 286 patients who underwent MILR with HCC from January 2006 to December 2017. All patients were divided into a MILR group and an unplanned conversion group. The clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. In addition, surgical outcomes in the conversion group were compared with the planned open surgery group (n = 505). Risk factors for unplanned conversion were analyzed.RESULTS: Of the 286 patients who underwent MILR, 18 patients (6.7%) had unplanned conversion during surgery. The unplanned conversion group showed statistically more blood loss, higher transfusion rate and postoperative complication rate, and longer hospital stay compared to the MILR group, whereas no such difference was observed in comparison with the planned open surgery group. There were no significant differences in overall and disease-free survival among 3 groups. The right-sided sectionectomy (right anterior and posterior sectionectomy), central bisectionectomy and tumor size were risk factors of unplanned conversion.CONCLUSION: Unplanned conversion during MILR for HCC was associated with poor perioperative outcomes, but it did not affect long-term oncologic outcomes in our study. In addition, when planning right-sided sectionectomy or central bisectionectomy for a large tumor (more than 5 cm), we should recommend open surgery or MILR with an informed consent for unplanned open conversions.

An Observational Study on Causes of Conversion on the Basis of Intra-Operative Findings in Patients Scheduled For Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Since the discovery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it has become the gold standard treatment for gall bladder pathology, especially cholelithiasis. Various complications can lead to open conversion and in our study we aim to study the various factors that can lead to open conversion. Aims & Objectives: 1. To identify the intra operative findings of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy which leads to conversion to open procedure. 2. To contribute experience to the existing data in the literature concerning several important aspect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Patients were recruited as per inclusion and exclusion criterion. The intra-operative findings for those patients undergoing open conversion were documented. Documentation of ultrasonographical (USG) findings i.e., gall bladder wall thickness, contracted / distended gall bladder, stone at the neck of gall bladder, pericholecystic collection etc. Results: In our study, 52 patients required open conversion leading to a conversion rate of 7.5 % which is found comparable with literature on similar studies. Conclusion: Surgeon experience, better patient selection etc. can lead to lower rate of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open procedure.

Mucinous carcinoma is a predictive factor for the risk of open conversion from laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery is widely accepted in the treatment of colorectal cancer, conversion to open surgery is associated with the rate of unfavorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with open conversion from laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.METHODS: A total of 3,002 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy as an initial plan for the treatment of colorectal cancer located from the sigmoid colon to the rectum were retrospectively evaluated between January 2009 and December 2018 at Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Risk factors significantly associated with open conversion were determined using univariate and multivariate regression models.RESULTS: Among the 3,002 patients, open conversion was performed in 120 patients (4%). Age >60 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.370), preoperative bowel obstruction (AOR, 2.348), clinical T4 stage (AOR, 2.201), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level >5 ng/mL (AOR, 2.289) were significantly associated with open conversion. Moreover, mucinous carcinoma was a significantly more frequent histopathologic type than adenocarcinoma (10.0% vs. 3.2%, P<0.001) in the open conversion group with an AOR of 2.549 (confidence interval, 1.259–5.159; P=0.009).CONCLUSION: The present study presented a novel finding, i.e. mucinous carcinoma as the histopathologic type could be an independent predictive factor for conversion from laparoscopic colectomy to open surgery. Identifying patients with mucinous carcinoma will help stratify the risk of open conversion preoperatively.

Late open conversion in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair / Conversão tardia para cirurgia aberta em um aneurisma roto da aorta abdominal após reparo endovascular

Abstract Despite technological advances, the long-term outcomes of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) are still debatable. Although most endograft failures after EVAR can be corrected with endovascular techniques, open conversion may still be required. A 70-year-old male patient presented at the emergency unit with abdominal pain. Twice, in the third and fourth years after the first repair, a stent graft had been placed over a non-adhesive portion of the stent graft due to type Ia endoleaks. In the most recent admission, a CT scan showed type III endoleak and ruptured aneurysm sac. On this occasion the patient underwent late open conversion. The failure was repaired with total preservation of the main endovascular graft body and interposition of a bifurcated dacron graft. This case demonstrates that lifelong radiographic surveillance should be considered in this subset of patients. Late open conversion following EVAR of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms can be performed safely.

Resumo Apesar dos avanços tecnológicos, os desfechos de longo prazo do reparo endovascular de aneurismas da aorta abdominal (endovascular aortic aneurysm repair - EVAR) ainda são objeto de debate. Embora a maioria das falhas de endoenxerto após EVAR possam ser corrigidas com técnicas endovasculares, conversão para cirurgia aberta ainda pode ser necessária. Um paciente de 70 anos de idade, do sexo masculino, apresentou-se no serviço de emergência com dor abdominal. Duas vezes, dois e quatro anos após o primeiro reparo, um enxerto foi colocado sobre uma porção não adesiva do stent devido a endoleak tipo Ia. Na mais recente hospitalização, a tomografia computadorizada mostrou endoleak tipo III e ruptura de um saco aneurismático. Nesta ocasião, o paciente foi submetido a conversão tardia para cirurgia aberta. A falha foi tratada com preservação total do corpo principal do enxerto endovascular e interposição de um enxerto tipo Dacron bifurcado. Este caso demonstra que a vigilância radiográfica ao longo de toda a vida deveria ser considerada nesse subgrupo de pacientes. Conversão tardia para cirurgia aberta após EVAR de aneurismas rotos da aorta abdominal pode ser realizada com segurança.

Risk Factors for Conversion in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE: Recently, laparoscopic surgery has been performed with increasing frequency in cases of various diseases, including colorectal cancer. However, in some cases, laparoscopic surgery should be converted to open procedures because of several factors. In this study, we tried to find the causes of and the risk factors for conversion to open procedures during colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: From June 2002 to May 2008, laparoscopic surgery in 324 patients who were diagnosed as having colorectal cancer was performed by two surgeons. Patients were divided into two groups, non-conversion and conversion groups. We investigated the differences in age, sex, presence of preoperative colonic obstruction, tumor invasion (pT stage), and so on between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 324 patients, 20 patients experienced an open conversion: 5 of 28 patients who had a colonic obstruction and 15 of 296 patients who had no obstruction (P=0.021). The causes of conversion during the surgery were tumor invasion, peritoneal adhesion, hemorrhage, and cancer perforation. There were 8 conversions out of 92 patients from June 2002 to May 2005 and 12 out of 232 from June 2005 to May 2008 (P=0.231). In regards to the degree of tumor invasion, 9 of 32 who were stage pT4 experienced a conversion to an open procedure (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the presence of a colonic obstruction and pT4 stage were meaningful risk factors for conversion to an open procedure. CONCLUSION: From this study, we can predict a higher rate of conversion to an open procedure in patients with locally advanced colon cancer, especially when a colonic obstruction is present. Therefore, a careful laparoscopic approach is needed in such patients.