Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment ; (12): 277-281, 2022.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-986509

RESUMEN

Due to the paranasal sinuses adjacent to the orbit, the sinonasal malignancy is prone to invade the orbit, which is not only the advanced stage of the tumor, but also one of the poor prognostic factors. Preoperative CT and MRI scan and intraoperative frozen section analysis are used to evaluate the orbital invasion of the tumor. Orbital preservation is adopted if the periorbita is not transgressed by tumor. Orbital preservation can be considered if the tumor invades the periorbita and extraconal fat in a limited range, responds well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy or other multimodality treatment, or has a negative section margin. Orbital exenteration is performed if the tumor extensively invades the periorbita, and invades the extraocular muscle, eyeball and orbital apex. Whether orbital preservation or orbital exenteration is adopted, it should be evaluated and made decision by a multidisciplinary team, and fully communicate with the patient.

2.
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society ; : 1455-1460, 2009.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-81449

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate ocular complications that occur after orbital preservation surgery for paranasal malignancies and to identify the early clinical features of ophthalmic manifestations in paranasal malignancy patients. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical charts of patients following ophthalmic consultation after orbital preservation surgery for paranasal malignancies. We also investigated the early clinical features of ophthalmic manifestations in patients with paranasal malignancies. RESULTS: In our study, 54 patients had paranasal malignancies. Among them, 41 had undergone orbital preservation surgery, and 19 patients sought an ophthalmology consultation. There were seven patients who presented with eye symptoms caused by paranasal malignancies before the diagnosis. Paranasal malignancies included squamouscell carcinoma (13 cases), adenocarcinoma (3 cases), plasmocytoma (1 case), malignant schwannoma (1 case), and undifferentiated carcinoma (1 case). The locations of the origin of the tumor included the maxillary sinus (16 cases) and the ethmoid sinus (3 cases). The most common eye symptoms after orbital preservation surgery were enophthalmos, lid retraction, tearing, strabismus, inflammation, dry eyes, and cataracts, in order of frequency. Patients who visited the ophthalmic clinic due to paranasal malignancies had eye symptoms such as proptosis, nonspecific ocular pain, strabismus, tearing, eyelid swelling, and relative afferent pupillary defects, in order of frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular complications were more common if the paranasal malignancy had invaded the orbital bone. However, many of the patients with disease invasion of the periosteum had no nasal or ocular symptoms upon presentation. Therefore, these patients should be managed carefully since symptoms may initially be vague and nonspecific.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma , Catarata , Enoftalmia , Senos Etmoidales , Exoftalmia , Ojo , Párpados , Inflamación , Seno Maxilar , Neurilemoma , Oftalmología , Órbita , Periostio , Plasmacitoma , Trastornos de la Pupila , Estrabismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA