RESUMEN
Objective To compare the efficacy of low temperature controlled plasma technology by nasal endoscopy and cystectomy via labiogingival groove approach in treatment of nasal vestibular cyst. Methods 38 patients with nasal vestibular cyst from Jan 2013 to Nov 2016 were selected and randomly divided into control group (n = 20) and observation group (n = 18). The control group received cystectomy via labiogingival groove approach and the observation group received low temperature controlled plasma technology by nasal endoscopy. The time of surgery, bleeding volume in surgery, hospitalization, postoperative complications and relapse were collected and compared between the two groups. Results We found that the observation group have less surgery time than that in control group [(65.45 ± 27.51) vs (34.72 ± 17.61) min, P = 0.000], less bleeding volume in surgery [(22.35 ± 18.41) vs (3.17 ± 1.69) ml, P = 0.000), less postoperative complications [(6.35 ± 0.75) vs (3.61 ± 1.19) d, P = 0.000] and less postoperative complications (16 vs 1, P = 0.000), but relapse of the two groups have no statistical difference (1 vs 0, P = 0.783). Conclusions Low temperature controlled plasma technology by nasal endoscopy in treatment of nasal vestibular cyst have many advantages than cystectomy via labiogingival groove approach such as shorter time of surgery, less bleeding volume in surgery, shorter hospitalization and less postoperative complications. Therefore it's worth of applying clinically.
RESUMEN
Objective: To explore the anesthetic management strategy in children undergoing adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy using low-temperature plasma technology.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the effectiveness,indications and side effect between microplasma technology (MPT) and 2940 nm Er ∶ YAG laser for treatment of burn scar.Methods 265 patients with hypertrophic scar were treated with MPT (MPT group,N=136) and Er ∶ YAG laser (Er ∶ YAG laser group,N=129).The patients were treated 2-6 times.Results The significant response rate was 73.52 ％ and 44.95 ％ in MPT group and Er ∶ YAG laser group; the cure rate was 28.67 ％ and 15.50 ％ in MPT group and Er ∶ YAG group,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P＞0.05).For moderate burn scar patients (93 cases),the significant response rate was 62.79 ％ and 10.00 ％ in MPT group and Er ∶ YAG laser group,respectively.There was significant difference between two groups (P＜0.05).Conclusions MPT and Er ∶ YAG laser has been proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of burn scar.The effectiveness of MPT is superior to Er ∶ YAG laser in treatment of moderate burn scar.