Systemic Corticosteroid Treatment in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: Impact on Outcomes and Complications / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: This study is to evaluate the effect of systemic corticosteroid on the clinical outcomes and the occurrence of complications in mechanical ventilated patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the clinical outcomes and complications in patients with severe CAP admitted to ICU between March 1, 2003 and July 28, 2009. Outcomes were measured by hospital mortality after ICU admission, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU, and hospital stay. Complications such as ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter related-blood stream infection (CR-BSI), and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding during ICU stay were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, 36 patients received corticosteroids over 7 days while 57 patients did not receive corticosteroids. Age, underlying disease, APACHE II, PSI score, and use of vasopressor were not different between two groups. In-hospital mortality was 30.5% in the steroid group and 36.8% in the non-steroid group (p>0.05). The major complications such as VAP, CR-BSI and UGI bleeding was significantly higher in the steroid group than in the non-steroid group (19.4% vs. 7%, p<0.05). The use of steroids and the duration of ICU stay were significantly associated with the development of major complications during ones ICU stay (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Systemic corticosteroid in patients with severe CAP requiring mechanical ventilation may have no beneficial effect on clinical outcomes like duration of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality but may contribute to the development of ICU acquired complications.

Community Acquired Pneumonia / 결핵및호흡기질환

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity, of mortality, and of expenditure of medical resources. The etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of CAP pathogens can differ by country. Treatment guidelines need to reflect the needs of individual countries based on pathogen susceptibility studies. Recent treatment guidelines for CAP in Korea were published by the Joint Committee of the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, the Korean Society for Chemotherapy, and the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases. In this article, the etiologies, diagnoses, treatments for CAP will be reviewed and compared to the recent published Korean guidelines for CAP treatment.

Community Acquired Pneumonia / 결핵및호흡기질환

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity, of mortality, and of expenditure of medical resources. The etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of CAP pathogens can differ by country. Treatment guidelines need to reflect the needs of individual countries based on pathogen susceptibility studies. Recent treatment guidelines for CAP in Korea were published by the Joint Committee of the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, the Korean Society for Chemotherapy, and the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases. In this article, the etiologies, diagnoses, treatments for CAP will be reviewed and compared to the recent published Korean guidelines for CAP treatment.

A Comparative Study of Nursing Home-Acquired Pneumonia with Community-Acquired Pneumonia / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: Little data is available regarding hospitalized patients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP). This is unfortunate because there is an increasing number of elderly persons who are living in nursing homes in Korea. The aim of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and treatment responses of NHAP with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Patients with pneumonia who were admitted from eight nursing homes or from their own homes were enrolled between May 2007 and April 2009. Their clinical characteristics and treatment responses were reviewed retrospectively, and differences between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 110 Patients with pneumonia, 66 (60%) were from nursing homes and their median age was 84. In the NHAP group, functional performance status was significantly poorer, classical symptoms of pneumonia were less severe, and multi-lobe involvement (on chest radiographs) was more frequent than in the CAP group. Patients with NHAP more frequently showed lymphocytopenia, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoxemia, and elevated blood urea nitrogen on admission. The mean CURB-65 score was 2.2 in the NHAP group, higher than 1.7 in the CAP group (p=0.004), and multi-drug resistant pathogens were also highly identified in NHAP group (39% vs. 10%, p=0.036). The mean duration of antibiotic therapy was greater for the NHAP (12.6 days) than for the CAP group (6.6 days) (p<0.001). The mortality rate was 23% in NHAP group, which was significantly higher than 5% in the CAP group (p=0.014). CONCLUSION: NHAP should be more intensively investigated because of the higher frequency of multi-drug resistant pathogens and mortality than the CAP.

Eficacia clínica de los macrólidos como parte del tratamiento empírico en neumonía de la comunidad que se interna: estudio piloto, aleatorizado, a doble-ciego / Clinical efficacy of macrolides as part of a combination therapy of community-acquired pneumonia: a pilot study

Introducción: A la fecha no se ha publicado un estudio aleatorizado que soporte las recomendaciones de tratamiento combinado en neumonía de la comunidad (NAC). El objetivo de este ensayo piloto fue evaluar los efectos clínicos de la adición de un macrólidoa la terapia empírica en pacientes con NAC. Materiales y métodos: Se aleatorizaron sesenta y dos pacientes hospitalizados por NAC a recibir ampicilina/sulbactam IV más azitromicina oral (n=32) versus ampicilina/sulbactam IV más placebo (n=30) a doble ciego. El punto final principal fue la cura precoz, evaluada al 5to día, definida como alta médica antes del 5to día ó estabilización clínica sin necesidad de cambios terapéuticos. Los puntos finales secundarios fueronestadía hospitalaria, fallo terapéutico y mortalidad. Resultados: La cura precoz fue mayor en el grupo macrólidos (81% vs 53%) (p=0.02), con una reducción de riesgo relativa de 60% (95% CI: 10-82%), una reducción absoluta de riesgo de 28% (95% CI: 5-50%) y un número necesario a tratar de 3 pacientes (95%CI: 2-18). La estadía hospitalaria fue menor en el grupo macrólidos (6,5 ± 2,3 vs 8,5 ±4,5 días, p=0.027). No hubo diferencias en cuanto a fallo terapéutico (3 versus 6 pacientes) ni mortalidad entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: En este estudio piloto, el uso de azitromicina oral en combinación conbetalactámicos se asoció a una mayor tasa de cura precoz y menor estadía hospitalaria, sugiriendo una resolución clínica acelerada de la neumonía.

Background and objectives: To date, no randomized trials support the recommendation of combination therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of the pilot study was to determine the clinical efficacy of the addition of a macrolide as part of anempirical therapy of patients with CAP.Methods: Sixty-two patients admitted for non-severe CAP were randomized into two double-blind groups: intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam plus oral azithromycin (n=32) versusintravenous ampicillin/sulbactam plus placebo (n=30). The primary end point was early cure, evaluated at 5th day, and defined as 1) discharge before 5th day; or 2) clinical stability without changes in the antibiotic therapy. The secondary end points were lengthof stay, treatment failure and mortality. Results: The early cure rate was higher in the macrolide group than in the placebo group (81% vs 53%) (p = 0.02), with a relative risk reduction of 60% (95% CI: 10 - 82%), anabsolute risk reduction of 28% (95% CI: 5 - 50%) and a needed number of 3 patients to be treated (95% CI: 2 - 18). The length of stay was shorter in the macrolide group (6.5 ±2.3 vs 8.5 ± 4.5 days, p = 0.027), and there were no differences in treatment failure (3 vs6 patients) or mortality. Conclusion: The use of oral azithromycin in combination with ampicillin/sulbactam wasassociated with a higher early cure rate and a shorter length of stay, suggesting an accelerated clinical resolution of CAP.

Neumonía por neumococo y pseudomonas aeruginosa adquirida en la comunidad en una paciente sin factores de riesgo / Pneumococcal and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa’s Community acquired pneumonia in a patient without risk factors

La neumonía adquirida en la comunidad es uno de los principales problemas de salud en niños. El Streptococcus pneumoniae es el microorganismo bacteriano más importante en todas las edades. Las bacterias gram negativas son una causa poco frecuente de esta entidad y cuando se presentan, generalmente están relacionadas con factores de riesgo como la inmunosupresión, hospitalizaciones y antibioticoterapia prolongada, procedimientos quirúrgicos repetidos y uso prolongado de ventilación mecánica invasiva y otros dispositivos como catéteres centrales y sondas. Dentro de este grupo de bacterias, la Pseudomonas aeruginosa es la tercera en frecuencia como causa de neumonía y sepsis adquiridas en la comunidad. Su infección está descrita ampliamente a nivel nosocomial. Es muy poco usual que se adquiera en la comunidad y más raro aún en pacientes que no tienen factores de riesgo para infección por este germen. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con neumonía necrotizante y empiema por neumococo y pseudomonas adquiridos en la comunidad de forma simultánea, en la cual no se lograron evidenciar factores predisponentes.

Community acquired Pneumonia is one of the main health problems in children. S. pneumoniae is the most important bacterial microorganismo at any age. Gram negative bacteria are a rare cause of this entity and when present, they usually are related with several risk factors like immunocompromised host, prolonged hospitalization and antimicrobial therapy, repeated surgical interventions, prolonged use of invasive mechanical ventilation and other medical invasive devices. In this group of bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the third in order of frequency to cause pneumonia and sepsis in the community setting. It’s more widely known as a nosocomial agent. It’s very unusual to be community acquired and even rarer in patients without risk factors for infection by this pathogen. In this paper we describe the case of a girl with both community acquired Pneumococcal and Pseudomonas necrotizing pneumonia and empyema at the same time, without any evidence of a predisposing factor.

Comparisons of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in COPD Patients Hospitalized with Community-acquired Pneumonia and Acute Exacerbation / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: Data comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP-COPD) and acute exacerbation (AE-COPD) are very limited. METHODS: Eighty episodes of hospitalization in 65 CAP-COPD patients, and 111 episodes of hospitalization in 82 AE-COPD patients were included in this study. The baseline characteristics, clinical presentations, potential bacterial pathogens and clinical outcomes in these patients were retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in parameters related to COPD and co-morbidities, except a higher rate of male among CAP-COPD patients. Clinical presentations by symptoms and laboratory findings on admission were significantly more severe in CAP-COPD patients, who showed higher rates of fever and crepitation, but less wheezing than AE-COPD patients. S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosae were the most common bacterial pathogens in both groups. With no difference in the overall hospital mortality between both groups, the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the CAP-COPD patients than in AE-COPD patients (15.3 vs. 9.8 days, respectively, p<0.01). Additional analysis on CAP-COPD patients showed that systemic steroid use did not influence the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in bacterial pathogens and overall hospital mortality between the two groups, CAP-COPD patients had more severe clinical symptoms and laboratory findings at presentation, and longer hospital stay than AE-COPD patients.

Comparisons of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in COPD Patients Hospitalized with Community-acquired Pneumonia and Acute Exacerbation / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: Data comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP-COPD) and acute exacerbation (AE-COPD) are very limited. METHODS: Eighty episodes of hospitalization in 65 CAP-COPD patients, and 111 episodes of hospitalization in 82 AE-COPD patients were included in this study. The baseline characteristics, clinical presentations, potential bacterial pathogens and clinical outcomes in these patients were retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in parameters related to COPD and co-morbidities, except a higher rate of male among CAP-COPD patients. Clinical presentations by symptoms and laboratory findings on admission were significantly more severe in CAP-COPD patients, who showed higher rates of fever and crepitation, but less wheezing than AE-COPD patients. S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosae were the most common bacterial pathogens in both groups. With no difference in the overall hospital mortality between both groups, the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the CAP-COPD patients than in AE-COPD patients (15.3 vs. 9.8 days, respectively, p<0.01). Additional analysis on CAP-COPD patients showed that systemic steroid use did not influence the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in bacterial pathogens and overall hospital mortality between the two groups, CAP-COPD patients had more severe clinical symptoms and laboratory findings at presentation, and longer hospital stay than AE-COPD patients.

Role of C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Differentiation of Tuberculosis from Bacterial Community Acquired Pneumonia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated the utility of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) for differentiating pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) from bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in South Korea, a country with an intermediate TB burden. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study, enrolling 87 participants with suspected CAP in a community-based referral hospital. A clinical assessment was performed before treatment, and serum CRP and PCT were measured. The test results were compared to the final diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the 87 patients, 57 had bacterial CAP and 30 had pulmonary TB. The median CRP concentration was 14.58 mg/dL (range, 0.30 to 36.61) in patients with bacterial CAP and 5.27 mg/dL (range, 0.24 to 13.22) in those with pulmonary TB (p<0.001). The median PCT level was 0.514 ng/mL (range, 0.01 to 27.75) with bacterial CAP and 0.029 ng/mL (range, 0.01 to 0.87) with pulmonary TB (p<0.001). No difference was detected in the discriminative values of CRP and PCT (p=0.733). CONCLUSIONS: The concentrations of CRP and PCT differed significantly in patients with pulmonary TB and bacterial CAP. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value for differentiating pulmonary TB from bacterial CAP suggest a supplementary role of CRP and PCT in the diagnostic exclusion of pulmonary TB from bacterial CAP in areas with an intermediate prevalence of pulmonary TB.

Etiology of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Tongling / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To investigate the pathogenic causes of community-acquired pneumonia(CAP) in adult patients in Tongling.METHODS A prospective study was performed on 260 consecutive adult patients with CAP in Tongling city during last three years.Bacteria culture of sputum and serological tests in paired serum samples were detected.RESULTS Of 260 patients with etiological evaluation,128(49.2%) patients had an identifiable etiology,63(24.2%) had positive outcome from sputum cultured,atypical pathogens were detected from 75(28.8%)patients.Pathogens identified in 128 patients were:Mycoplasma pneumoniae(35.4%),Chlamydia pneumoniae(17.7%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae(13.6%).6.5% All patients had mixed infection.The resistance rate of S.pneumoniae to penicillin and erythromycin was 5 and 50%,respectively.CONCLUSIONS Atypical pathogens have important role in CAP,of which M.pneumoniae is the most common pathogen.S.pneumoniae and K.pneumoniae are the commonly encountered bacteria for CAP in Tongling.