RESUMEN
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading cause of the morbidity and mortality in India and worldwide and last decade has seen a steep rise in incidence of CAD in India and its treatment as bypass surgery. Direct visualization of the grafts and native coronary arteries by invasive catheterization is now being replaced by non-invasive CT coronary angiography with higher slice machines and newer technology as it has good temporal resolution, high scanning speed as well as low radiation dose. We share our experience of graft imaging on 128 slice CT machine.Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study. We included 500 symptomatic patients who have undergone CT study between the year 2014 to 2018 post bypass surgery.Results: Arterial grafts have a better patency rate than venous grafts. (88% vs. 64.1%). Amongst the individual arterial grafts RIMA had the best patency rate (100%) followed by LIMA (90.8%), RA (68.7%). LAD was the most commonly involved artery (91%).Conclusions: Significant absolute concordance between CT and catheter angiographic findings have been documented for all arterial and venous grafts patency in the literature. The MSCT with retrospective gating permits an accurate and non-invasive evaluation of patent and diseased arterial and vein grafts and could replace conventional angiography for the follow-up of symptomatic, stable patients. Moreover, an optimal diagnostic accuracy was also documented in the appraisal of native vessels distal to the graft anastomoses.
RESUMEN
We report a case of redo aortic valve replacement by right minithoracotomy approach for aortic stenosis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). An 81-year-old man was followed-up once a year for 9 years after CABG. He complained of increasing respiratory distress, showed narrowing of the aortic valve area, elevation of the aortic valve pressure gradient, and tricuspid valve regurgitation by echocardiography. He was admitted for surgery. We considered minimally invasive operation would be better for him and performed aortic valve replacement (Carpentier-Edwards Perimaunt valve 19 mm) by a right minithoracotomy approach because graft injury could occur by median sternotomy after CABG, and he had the risks of advanced age, low activities of daily living, and mild dementia. His postoperative course was uneventful. On echocardiography performed at postoperative days 9, the ejection fraction recovered to 75% from 53% before surgery and the mean aortic valve pressure gradient was 8 mmHg. He was discharged on postoperative day 12. Right minithoracotomy approach with port access is a good option for redo operation for aortic valve stenosis after CABG.
RESUMEN
Background: Aspirin used after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) improved patient survival and reduced graft thrombosis. However, individual variations in the antiplatelet effect of aspirin have been reported among CABG patients. Objective: To compare the intensity of platelet aggregation between patients receiving low and high aspirin dosage in post CABG patients. Methods: We prospectively studied the effect of aspirin dosage on platelet aggregation in 100 CABG patients. Oral aspirin was discontinued prior to CABG and re-started within 12 hours after CABG. Blood samples were collected and transferred to a laboratory prior to surgery then again on postoperative days two and eight for platelet aggregation test and platelet count within three hours after venipuncture. Results: One hundred patients (sixty five male and thirty five female patients) post coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were evaluated for eligibility to enter the trial. The percentage of platelet aggregation was compared between low dose (<100 mg/day), and high dose (>100 mg/day) aspirin, at postoperative CABG days 2 and 8, which showed no significant difference for the platelet aggregation (p = 0.161 post CABG day 2 and p = 0.098 post CABG day 8). Conclusion: Low dosage aspirin should be used in post CABG patients because the intensity of platelet aggregation between patients post CABG receiving low and high aspirin dosage were not different, while the prophylactic effect of the low aspirin dosage in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events proved equally as effective as the high aspirin dosage.