RESUMEN
Objective:To summarize the nursing experience of patients with traumatic aortic dissection.Methods:The clinical data of 72 patients with traumatic aortic dissection treated in our department from January 2009 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Maintain hemodynamic stability and prevent shock, accurate judgment and effective analgesia, safe transportation and avoid secondary damage, careful skin care during bed confinement, prevention of deep vein thrombosis, lung nursing after thoracic injury are included.Results:Totally 69 patients survived, the survival rate was 95.83%. 1 patient was critically ill before the operation and was treated with invasive ventilator at admission. After the above nursing, he could not maintain effective vital signs and died. 1 patient died of aortic dissection rupture before operation. 1 patient died of disseminated intravascular coagulation after stent implantation. 1 patient suffered from skin pressure injury during hospitalization. No aortic rupture or fracture site displacement occurred in tran sit. Among the 5 patients with atelectasis, 1 died of using invasive ventilator before operation, and the other 4 patients recovered well after treatment with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. No DVT occurred in all patients during hospitalization, 1 patient was diagnosed as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism at admission. After treatment, the symptoms of pulmonary embolism improved.Conclusions:Pay attention to hemodynamic monitoring and maintenance of stability, accurate analgesia, safe transport, skin care, anticoagulation prevention of deep vein thrombosis and intraoperative bleeding, lung care after chest injury, can effectively reduce complications and promote the rehabilitation of patients.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the prevalence and factors associated with pressure injuries related to the use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted using an instrument made available in social networks with 1,106 health professionals. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared, considering pvalue < 0.05. Results: There was a prevalence of 69.4% for pressure injuries related to the use of personal protective equipment, with an average of 2.4 injuries per professional. The significant factors were: under 35 years of age, working and wearing personal protective equipment for more than six hours a day, in hospital units, and without the use of inputs for protection. Conclusion: Pressure injuries related to the use of medical devices showed a high prevalence in this population. The recognition of the damage in these professionals makes it possible to advance in prevention strategies.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Describir prevalencia y factores relacionados a la lesión por presión relacionada al uso de equipos de protección personal durante la pandemia del COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio transversal realizado mediante instrumento disponible en redes sociales con 1.106 profesionales de salud. Los datos han analizados por medio de estadística descriptiva y comparada, considerando valor de p < 0,05. Resultados: Hubo prevalencia de 69,4% para lesión por presión relacionada al uso del equipo de protección personal, con una media de 2,4 lesiones por profesional. Los factores significativos fueron: menores de 35 años de edad, trabajar y hacer uso de equipos de protección personal por más de seis horas al día, en unidades hospitalarias y sin el uso de suministros para protección. Conclusión: La lesión por presión relacionada al uso de dispositivos médicos presentó alta prevalencia en esa población. El reconocimiento de la lesión en esos profesionales posibilita avanzar en estrategias de prevención.
RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever prevalência e fatores associados da lesão por pressão relacionada ao uso de equipamentos de proteção individual durante a pandemia da COVID-19. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado por meio de instrumento disponibilizado em redes sociais com 1.106 profissionais de saúde. Os dados foram analisados por meio de estatística descritiva e comparada, considerando valor de p < 0,05. Resultados: Houve prevalência de 69,4% para lesão por pressão relacionada ao uso do equipamento de proteção individual, com uma média de 2,4 lesões por profissional. Os fatores significativos foram: menores de 35 anos de idade, trabalhar e fazer uso de equipamentos de proteção individual por mais de seis horas no dia, em unidades hospitalares e sem o uso de insumos para proteção. Conclusão: A lesão por pressão relacionada ao uso de dispositivos médicos apresentou alta prevalência nessa população. O reconhecimento da lesão nesses profissionais possibilita avançar em estratégias de prevenção.